{"id":216008,"date":"2019-06-21T15:30:23","date_gmt":"2019-06-21T10:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216008"},"modified":"2019-06-27T17:22:27","modified_gmt":"2019-06-27T11:52:27","slug":"jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court<\/strong>: The instant writ petition entertained by Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the Memo issued by the respondent whereby the water reservoirs in the urban area has been directed to be handed over in favor of the municipality.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had contended that certain water reservoirs had been settled in favor of the petitioner for the year 2016-17 and in terms of the contract the petitioner carried out the fishing work in the aforesaid tanks but all of a sudden the impugned decision was taken on by which the tank was transferred in favor of the municipality therefore, the ground was raised that when the terms and conditions of the contract was in subsistence during the course when the impugned order was passed, the same cannot be done in the course of subsistence period of the contract, hence the impugned order was not sustainable in the eyes of law.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the State-respondent Gautam Kumar, submitted that the impugned decision was taken in terms of the Cabinet decision which was issued by the appropriate authorities and the said Cabinet decision was taken in pursuance to the provision of Section 126 of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 wherein the provision was made about vesting of property which includes public tanks\/reservoirs also, therefore, if the Cabinet took a decision to follow the statue and in terms thereof any decision which was taken, the same cannot be interfered with.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the tanks in question were settled in favor of the petitioner in the year 2016-17 by the order in that regard by the competent authority but in course of subsistence period of the contract the impugned decision was taken to transfer the tanks in favor of the municipality by taking aid of the decision by the State of Jharkhand. It further found no dispute about the settled position of law that if any Act has been acted upon, it was to be followed in its strict sense and there cannot be any deviation otherwise it will be said that the rule of law was not prevailing. It held, \u201cIt is a settled legal proposition that Article 14 of the Constitution is not meant to perpetuate illegality or fraud, even by extending the wrong decisions made in other cases. The said provision does not envisage negative equality but has only a positive aspect.<\/em>\u201d Hence, the petition was dismissed.[Somath Haldar v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 683<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-06-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: The instant writ petition entertained by Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31370,36202,10341,36204,36205,16091,36203,36206,36201],"class_list":["post-216008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-memo","tag-municipality","tag-negative-equality","tag-perpetuate-illegality-or-fraud","tag-rule-of-law","tag-section-126-of-jharkhand-municipal-act","tag-urban-area","tag-water-reservoirs"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: The instant writ petition entertained by Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-21T10:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-27T11:52:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-21T10:00:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-27T11:52:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: The instant writ petition entertained by Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-21T10:00:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-27T11:52:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/","name":"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-21T10:00:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-27T11:52:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/jhar-hc-art-14-does-not-envisage-negative-equality-wrong-benefits-conferred-upon-someone-inadvertently-not-to-be-a-ground-to-grant-similar-relief-to-others\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Art. 14 does not envisage negative equality; wrong benefits conferred upon someone inadvertently not to be a ground to grant similar relief to others"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/27\/jharkhand-high-court-directs-compensation-illegal-detention-by-police\/","url_meta":{"origin":216008,"position":0},"title":"4 months’ illegal detention by police; Jharkhand High Court directs State to pay compensation of Rs 5 lakhs","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court commented that the State Police's lackadaisical attitude to arrest anyone and put him in custody made the petitioner suffer humiliation, who was having a bright career and completed SSC exam.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-471.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-471.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-471.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-471.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/28\/court-not-to-act-as-expert-in-education-matters-candidature-shall-be-better-judged-by-the-respective-authorities-jharkhand-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216008,"position":1},"title":"Court not to act as expert in education matters; candidature shall be better judged by respective authorities: Jharkhand HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a petition as it was out of their domain under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent to consider the appointment of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":48531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/21\/all-government-buildings-in-the-state-to-have-rainwater-harvesting-structures-ordered\/","url_meta":{"origin":216008,"position":2},"title":"All Government buildings in the State to have Rainwater Harvesting Structures, ordered","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: While hearing a PIL seeking cleaning of water bodies and reservoirs to deal with the water crisis across the State, the Court has directed the State Government to equip all Government buildings with rainwater harvesting structures immediately and file a status report in this regard on or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250387,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/28\/fir\/","url_meta":{"origin":216008,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | Practice of filing a writ petition Art. 226 of the Constitution of India because a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police must be discouraged","author":"Editor","date":"June 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed for direction upon the respondents to lodge F.I.R. on the basis of written complaint made by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219415,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/","url_meta":{"origin":216008,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J, dismissed the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. In the pertinent case, the petitioner moved to the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved with the decision taken by the Ranchi Regional Development Authority (RRDA)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":304364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/cal-hc-directs-to-rectify-employees-re-designation-on-violation-of-article-14-of-constitution-of-india-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":216008,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court directs rectification of employee\u2019s re-designation and retiral benefit calculation on violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India","author":"Ritu","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe High Court in exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 can even mould the relief or reliefs to meet the peculiar and complicated requirements of the country.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216008"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216008\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}