{"id":215926,"date":"2019-06-19T16:00:13","date_gmt":"2019-06-19T10:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215926"},"modified":"2019-06-19T14:55:48","modified_gmt":"2019-06-19T09:25:48","slug":"australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"

Federal Court of Australia: <\/strong>Collier, J. allowed an appeal against the decision of the Federal Circuit Court in which the primary Judge dismissed the appellant\u2019s application for review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (herein ‘Tribunal’).<\/p>\n

The appellant was a citizen of Nepal. He was granted a higher education sector visa to take a tertiary preparation pathway course followed by a Bachelor of Business degree. Subsequently, after three years, the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (herein ‘Department’) sent a written notice that mentioned that the Minister was considering canceling the appellant\u2019s visa because the appellant breached the condition 8202 Schedule\u00a08 of the Migration Regulations, 1994<\/em> (herein ‘Regulation’) as he failed to maintain his enrolment in a registered course of study for a period of approximately six months. The appellant responded to the Department via email, explaining that his mother had been diagnosed with breast cancer and his mother\u2019s condition made it mentally and financially difficult for him to continue his studies. However, his visa was cancelled. The appellant applied to the Tribunal for review of the delegate\u2019s decision. The Tribunal concluded that the visa should be cancelled after considering the circumstances as a whole. The appellant sought judicial review of the Tribunal\u2019s decision by way of application to the Federal Circuit Court. The Federal Circuit Court upheld the Tribunal’s decision.<\/p>\n

The learned counsel for the appellant, Ms B. Vass argued that the Federal Circuit Court erred in failing to find that the Tribunal\u2019s decision was affected by the jurisdictional error and it did not accord the appellant natural justice. It failed to take or adequately take into account the relevant considerations being, the effects of Mr Rana\u2019s mother\u2019s illness on Mr Rana\u2019s mental health and his financial concerns, thus, the reasoning behind his temporary cessation of studies. Moreover, he also contended that it failed to act in a manner that was reasonable or just according to law and did not act upon the evidence before it. Further, he submitted that the Tribunal had failed to take into account the purpose of the appellant\u2019s travel and stay in Australia, and the temporary nature of the appellant\u2019s breach of his visa.<\/p>\n

The respondent, through a written notice, submitted that the findings of the Tribunal were reasonably open to it and that the grounds of appeal invited impermissible merits review.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the appellant’s claims were without merit. It further noted that the Tribunal\u2019s decision was based on the grounds that the appellant failed to comply with the conditions of his student visa, and he also exhibited poor academic history and unsatisfactory course attendance prior to the onset of mother\u2019s medical condition. He lacked the desire or ability to successfully undertake higher education course, thus \u201cIt would be artificial in these circumstances to conclude that the Tribunal had not had meaningful regard to the purpose of study by the appellant.\u201d<\/em><\/strong> Reliance was placed upon Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v. Wu Shan Liang, <\/em>(1996) 185 CLR 259 at 272 to rule that on the evidence available, the findings of the Tribunal were reasonably open to it and \u201cthe ground of review merely invites the Court to engage in a merits review which is impermissible<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed with costs.[Rana v. Minister for Home Affairs, [2019] FCA 915, decided on 18-06-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Federal Court of Australia: Collier, J. allowed an appeal against the decision of the Federal Circuit Court in which the primary Judge <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":215927,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Federal Court of Australia: Collier, J. allowed an appeal against the decision of the Federal Circuit Court in which the primary Judge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-19T10:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/\",\"name\":\"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-19T10:30:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority","og_description":"Federal Court of Australia: Collier, J. allowed an appeal against the decision of the Federal Circuit Court in which the primary Judge","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-19T10:30:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/","name":"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg","datePublished":"2019-06-19T10:30:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/australia-no-illegality-in-order-cancelling-higher-education-visa-of-a-student-where-all-circumstances-taken-into-consideration-by-the-authority\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia | No illegality in order cancelling higher education visa of a student where all circumstances taken into consideration by the Authority"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/federal-court-of-australia.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":233383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/05\/federal-court-of-australia-allows-appeal-by-sri-lankan-rape-survivor-against-denial-of-visa-acknowledges-australias-protection-obligations-to-refugees\/","url_meta":{"origin":215926,"position":0},"title":"Federal Court of Australia allows appeal by Sri Lankan rape survivor against denial of visa, acknowledges Australia\u2019s protection obligations to refugees","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Federal Court of Australia: Stewart, J. allowed an appeal filed by a Sri Lankan rape survivor who had applied for an Australian visa, holding that the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) erred in rejecting the applicant\u2019s claim that social stigma arising from her sexual assault coupled with her Tamil ethnicity could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Federal-Court-of-Australia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Federal-Court-of-Australia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Federal-Court-of-Australia.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Federal-Court-of-Australia.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Federal-Court-of-Australia.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216848,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/australia-hc-sperm-donor-who-does-more-than-only-providing-his-semen-to-facilitate-artificial-conception-considered-as-parent-of-child-born-out-of-such-procedure\/","url_meta":{"origin":215926,"position":1},"title":"Australia HC | Sperm donor who does more than only providing his semen to facilitate artificial conception \u2013 considered as \u2018parent\u2019 of child born out of such procedure","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Australia: Kiefel, CJ. and Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman, JJ., allowed an appeal that sought ascertainment that the appellant was to be presumed the father of his biological daughter or not. It was to be decided by exercising Section 79(1) of the Judiciary Act, 1903\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/HCCourt-of-australia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/HCCourt-of-australia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/HCCourt-of-australia.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/HCCourt-of-australia.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/HCCourt-of-australia.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/18\/cestat-can-demand-of-service-tax-be-levied-under-commercial-services-involving-composite-contracts-tribunal-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":215926,"position":2},"title":"CESTAT | Can demand of Service Tax be levied under commercial services involving composite contracts? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"December 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Division Coram of Sulekha Beevi (Judicial Member) and P Venkat Subbarao (Technical Member) allowed an appeal made in pursuance of an impugned order which allowed levy of service tax on construction services involving composite contracts consisting of material + service. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236801,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/06\/sl-sc-s-31-b-5-of-industrial-disputes-act-does-not-debar-from-maintaining-application-to-labour-tribunal-against-termination-of-services-and-to-file-fundamental-rights-application-to-sc-simu\/","url_meta":{"origin":215926,"position":3},"title":"SL SC | S. 31 B (5) of Industrial Disputes Act does not debar from maintaining application to\u00a0Labour Tribunal against termination of services and to file fundamental rights application to SC simultaneously","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, CJ and Murdu N.B. Fernando and S. Thurairaja, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed being aggrieved by the order of the High Court in a matter of violation of fundamental rights alleging unlawful\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/22\/cestat-whether-there-can-be-a-claim-of-exclusion-of-the-freight-amount-from-arriving-at-the-assessable-value-for-the-purpose-of-payment-of-central-excise-duty-tribunal-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":215926,"position":4},"title":"CESTAT | Whether there can be a claim of exclusion of the freight amount from arriving at the assessable value for the purpose of payment of central excise duty; Tribunal explains","author":"Editor","date":"January 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of P.K. Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal filed by the assessee against the demand of Central Excise duty of Rs 5,25,70,268 along with equal penalty and applicable interest confirmed by the Commissioner, Central\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":215926,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A.M. Babu, J. dismissed a regular second appeal filed by a lady on the ground that no substantial question of law was involved therein. The appellant herein and the respondent herein were neighbors. The appellant claimed that the respondent constructed his house between the period 2003-2012 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215926\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/215927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}