{"id":215888,"date":"2019-06-19T10:30:45","date_gmt":"2019-06-19T05:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215888"},"modified":"2019-07-05T12:46:26","modified_gmt":"2019-07-05T07:16:26","slug":"all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can’t be considered when evidence gathered by IO can’t be scrutinized by Court"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. quashed the application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground that as the evidence cannot be scrutinized it cannot be said that no cognizable offence was made out against the applicant.<\/p>\n

An application was made to quash the charge sheet made under Sections 323, 506, 452, 354-A of the Penal Code.<\/p>\n

Aushim Malhotra, advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. The victim had suffered not any serious injury except that she was having a complaint of pain. There was also the delay of 9 days in lodging the FIR.\u00a0 It was further submitted that the accused had no criminal history, hence prayed for quashing the FIR.<\/p>\n

Vimal Kumar Pandey, AGA vehemently opposed the prayer for quashing the same.<\/p>\n

The Court after going through the matter on record held that opposite party was attempted to be molested by the accused-applicant and when she tried to defend herself, she was beaten with fists & kicks and when the mother-in-law of the victim had arrived, she was also pushed off.\u00a0 It was further submitted that \u201cFrom the perusal of material on record and looking into the facts of this case, at this stage, it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the Bar relates to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC<\/em>.\u201d\u00a0 The disputed defense of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Thus the prayer for quashing the proceedings was refused. But the Court on the settled principle of the law in the case of Amrawati v. State of U.P<\/em>., 2004 (57) ALR 290 held that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the Court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail may be considered. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.[Ram Vilas v. State of U.P., 2019 SCC OnLine All 2272<\/b><\/a>, decided on 14-06-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. quashed the application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33741,3067,13311,36137],"class_list":["post-215888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizable-offence","tag-FIR","tag-material-on-record","tag-section-482-of-code-of-criminal-procedure"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC | Disputed defense of accused can't be considered when evidence gathered by IO can't be scrutinized by Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can't be considered when evidence gathered by IO can't be scrutinized by Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. quashed the application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-19T05:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-05T07:16:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can't be considered when evidence gathered by IO can't be scrutinized by Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-19T05:00:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-05T07:16:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can’t be considered when evidence gathered by IO can’t be scrutinized by Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can't be considered when evidence gathered by IO can't be scrutinized by Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can't be considered when evidence gathered by IO can't be scrutinized by Court","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. quashed the application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-19T05:00:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-05T07:16:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/","name":"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can't be considered when evidence gathered by IO can't be scrutinized by Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-19T05:00:45+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-05T07:16:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/all-hc-disputed-defense-of-accused-cant-be-considered-when-evidence-gathered-by-io-cant-be-scrutinized-by-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Disputed defense of accused can’t be considered when evidence gathered by IO can’t be scrutinized by Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259990,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/false-promise-to-marry\/","url_meta":{"origin":215888,"position":0},"title":"False promise of marriage to satisfy lust, leading to offence of cheating and rape?: Bom HC refuses to quash FIR for offences under Ss. 376, 417 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of A.S. Chandurkar and G.A. Sanap, JJ.,\u00a0 refused to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC for quashing an FIR in offences of cheating and rape in the matter wherein the applicant\/accused committed sexual intercourse with the girl against her will in the pretext of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/high-court-does-not-function-as-court-of-appeal-or-revision-while-exercising-jurisdiction-u-s-482-crpc-utthc\/","url_meta":{"origin":215888,"position":1},"title":"High Court does not function as a Court of Appeal or Revision while exercising jurisdiction u\/s 482 of CrPC: Uttaranchal High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of CrPC though wide should not be capriciously or arbitrarily exercised but should be exercised in appropriate cases to do real and substantial justice. Thus, quashing of charge sheet or setting aside summoning order on appreciation of evidence is not justified.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Uttaranchal High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/court-cant-quash-trial-process-u-s-482-crpc-in-case-of-disputed-facts-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":215888,"position":2},"title":"High Courts cannot quash trial over disputed questions of facts: Allahabad High Court","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court in exercise of power under Section 482 of the CrPC cannot assume such jurisdiction and put an end to the process of trial provided under the law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"quash trial over disputed questions of facts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/03\/annoyance-to-others-prerequisite-to-invoke-offence-s-294-ipc-allahabad-hc-while-quashing-criminal-case-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":215888,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Annoyance to others\u2019 a prerequisite to invoke offence under Section 294 of IPC; Allahabad HC quashes criminal case","author":"Editor","date":"June 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The issue of \"obscenity or indecency per se\" will not arise until or unless there is evidence on record to see that a person at a given time witnessing particular obscene act is actually annoyed or not.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220398,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/all-hc-evidences-gathered-by-investigating-officer-cannot-be-looked-under-inherent-powers-consent-for-sexual-intercourse-on-promise-to-marry-held-to-be-subject-matter-of-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":215888,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Evidences gathered by Investigating Officer cannot be looked under Inherent powers; Consent for sexual intercourse on promise to marry, held to be subject matter of evidence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Applicant filed an application under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code which was contemplated by Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. where the prayer was to quash the Charges under certain Sections of Penal Code, 1860. The applicant was charged under Sections 366, 376, 328, 506, 406 of IPC,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/17\/settlement-terms-decided-by-mediation-and-conciliation-centre-can-be-the-reason-for-quashing-of-a-first-information-report-under-s-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":215888,"position":5},"title":"Settlement terms decided by Mediation and Conciliation Centre, can be the reason for quashing of an FIR under S. 482 CrPC: All HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Rajeev Singh, J., reiterated that under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, an FIR i.e. First Information Report can be quashed in view of the settlement terms. Application under Section 482 CrPC was filed with a request that the matter may be referred to the Mediation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}