{"id":215818,"date":"2019-06-17T13:31:21","date_gmt":"2019-06-17T08:01:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215818"},"modified":"2019-06-27T17:30:01","modified_gmt":"2019-06-27T12:00:01","slug":"utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/b>: The instant petition was entertained by Ravindra Maithani, J. where the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC applied for quashing of the chargesheet and impugned cognizance order for offence under Section 420 IPC, which was pending before Civil Judge.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Petitioner had stated that an FIR was lodged in 2016 against him, where the petitioner was accused of cheating 52 students. In the FIR it was stated that, the petitioner took the educational documents, photos, identity card as well as income certificate of all those students and got them admitted in more than one colleges and thereby received the scholarship. In the FIR name of 41 such students have been mentioned. After investigation charge sheet was submitted against the petitioner. The Investigating Officer found the allegations levelled in the FIR as true.<\/p>\n

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the allegations were not believable; It was categorically averred that one person cannot do such an act on his own; what was requested was that direction may be issued that bail application of the petitioner may be considered on the same day when it was presented before the court.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court observed that the petitioner had filed the present application under Section 482, material that was also available at this stage before the Court was an FIR, which definitely discloses the commission of cognizable offence and a charge sheet, which stated that in fact, the offence as alleged in the FIR has been proved. In the absence of any other material, the Court didn\u2019t presume that the story was not believable. Investigating Officer had found that the offence was committed. Therefore, there was no reason to make any interference and the petition deserved to be dismissed.[Chandra Kiran v. State of Uttarakhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 506<\/b><\/span><\/a>, decided on 29-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: The instant petition was entertained by Ravindra Maithani, J. where the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC applied for quashing <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31844,3067,33118,13021],"class_list":["post-215818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-chargesheet","tag-FIR","tag-section-420-ipc","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: The instant petition was entertained by Ravindra Maithani, J. where the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC applied for quashing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-17T08:01:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-27T12:00:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-17T08:01:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-27T12:00:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":320,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Chargesheet\",\"FIR\",\"Section 420 IPC\",\"section 482 crpc\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-17T08:01:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-27T12:00:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/17\\\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: The instant petition was entertained by Ravindra Maithani, J. where the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC applied for quashing","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-17T08:01:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-27T12:00:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary","datePublished":"2019-06-17T08:01:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-27T12:00:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/"},"wordCount":320,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Chargesheet","FIR","Section 420 IPC","section 482 crpc"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","name":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-17T08:01:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-27T12:00:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":201678,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/12\/forging-of-cheques-is-serious-economic-offence-compromise-between-parties-not-accepted-under-section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":215818,"position":0},"title":"Forging of cheques is serious economic offence; compromise between parties not accepted under Section 482 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC invoking the inherent powers of the Court, seeking the quashing of FIR filed against the petitioner, on the ground of compromise entered into between the parties. The petitioner was facing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":215818,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/kar-hc-exercising-power-under-s-482-crpc-court-quashes-chargesheet-against-arrayed-accused-in-absence-of-any-prima-facie-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":215818,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0Exercising power under S. 482 CrPC, Court quashes chargesheet against arrayed accused in absence of any prima facie case","author":"Editor","date":"October 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Ashok G. Nijagannavar, J., allowing the present petition, quashed the chargesheet filed and made significant observations with respect to Court\u2019s power under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code. Brief Facts The complainant Police Inspector received credible information about illegal activities regarding prostitution by supplying foreign and Indian girls\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":295094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":215818,"position":3},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji","author":"Ritu","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The present case is \u201cnothing but the assimilation of personal and political antipathies, more precisely, a politically oriented-animosity, which makes the petitioner's prosecution malicious.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294765,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/16\/quarrel-over-a-cat-meghalaya-hc-quashes-fir-under-s-307-against-son-in-law-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":215818,"position":4},"title":"[Fight over a Cat] Meghalaya HC discharges Son-in-law from Attempt to Murder of Father-in-Law","author":"Editor","date":"June 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court said as the son-in-law did not have the intention to cause death.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/01\/del-hc-offences-under-s-377-ipc-s-4-pocso-act-committed-on-a-child-aged-7-years-father-of-victim-sought-quashing-of-fir-will-hc-quash-the-fir-read-to-know\/","url_meta":{"origin":215818,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Offences under S. 377 IPC & S. 4 POCSO Act committed on a child aged 7 years, father of victim sought quashing of FIR: Will HC quash the FIR? Read to know","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., in regard to quashing of FIRs expressed that: \"High Court cannot mechanically quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences by exercising powers under Section 482 CrPC just because parties have decided to bury their hatchets.\" The instant petition was filed for quashing of an FIR for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215818"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215818\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}