{"id":215813,"date":"2019-06-17T09:30:10","date_gmt":"2019-06-17T04:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215813"},"modified":"2019-07-03T13:45:26","modified_gmt":"2019-07-03T08:15:26","slug":"tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and Arindam Lodh, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the order of the family Judge whereby the husband was directed to pay pendente lite maintenance of Rs 8000 per month to her wife.<\/p>\n

Arijit Bhowmik, Advocate representing the appellant-husband submitted that though the appellant was an employee of ONGC having a salary of Rs 39, 649, however, he received only Rs 19,338 after various deductions. It was prayed that the maintenance\u00a0allowance may be reduced. per contra, H.K. Bhowmik, Advocate appearing for the respondent-wife submitted that Rs 8,000 per month were minimum to lead a dignified life, which is one of the essential features of Article 21 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n

On perusing the record, the High Court found that the wife was forced to stay at her parents’ house. it was noted that there were many bald allegations levelled against her such as she was not interested in having sex with the appellant-husband and that she threatened him to commit suicide. In the Court’s opinion, the allegations were not substantiated by cogent evidence. It was said:\u00a0“these are the normal wear and tear of marital life and for this, the wife should not be forced to be separated from the appellant-husband. The wife is entitled to lead a life at part the standard of the husband.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Having considered all the aspects, the court was not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the family Judge. Resultantly, the appeal was dismissed. [Debasish Chakraborty v. Soma Bhattacharjee, 2019 SCC OnLine Tri 159<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and Arindam Lodh, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32220,32080,2549,30970,36082],"class_list":["post-215813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21-of-constitution-of-india","tag-dignified-life","tag-maintenance","tag-pendente-lite","tag-section-191-of-family-courts-act"],"yoast_head":"\nTri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and Arindam Lodh, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-17T04:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-03T08:15:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-17T04:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-03T08:15:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed","og_description":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and Arindam Lodh, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-17T04:00:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-03T08:15:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/","name":"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-17T04:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-03T08:15:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/tri-hc-wife-entitled-to-lead-life-at-par-the-standard-of-husband-appeal-under-s-191-of-family-courts-act-for-reducing-pendente-lite-maintenance-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Wife entitled to lead life at par the standard of husband, appeal under S. 19(1) of Family Courts Act for reducing pendente lite maintenance dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/husband-not-allowed-to-take-benefit-of-non-disclosure-of-income-and-defeat-legitimate-right-of-wife-no-reduction-in-amount-of-maintenance-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":215813,"position":0},"title":"Husband not allowed to take benefit of non-disclosure of income and defeat legitimate right of wife; no reduction in amount of maintenance: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the husband against the award of maintenance pendente lite awarded to the wife by the family court. The instant appeal was filed by the husband under Section 19 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/del-hc-s-24-hma-not-meant-to-equalise-income-of-wife-with-that-of-husband-wife-cannot-convert-husbands-income-in-indian-currency-and-seek-enhancement\/","url_meta":{"origin":215813,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | S. 24 HMA not meant to equalise income of wife with that of husband; wife cannot convert husband’s income in Indian currency and seek enhancement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Jyoti Singh and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the family court rejecting the appellant-wife's\u00a0application for grant of maintenance pendente\u00a0lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1951. The parties married to each-other in June 2012 and had been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/12\/estimation-of-husbands-income-is-permissible-while-granting-maintenance-pendente-lite-under-section-24-hindu-marriage-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":215813,"position":2},"title":"Estimation of husband’s income is permissible while granting maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench comprising of M.M.S. Bedi and Anupinder Singh Grewal, JJ. allowed an application filed by the respondent-wife for maintenance pendente lite. The appellant-husband had preferred an appeal against the dismissal of his divorce petition. The respondent-wife had filed the application under Section 24\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/raj-hc-wife-earning-a-certain-amount-will-not-absolve-husbands-liability-to-provide-maintenance-under-s-24-hma-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":215813,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC |\u00a0Wife earning a certain amount will not absolve husband’s liability to provide maintenance under S. 24 HMA Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an aggrieved husband stating that, \u201cEven if the wife earns a certain amount, that does not absolve the husband of his liability to maintain her in the meaning of Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274508,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/26\/evidence-not-adduced-maintenance-application-not-decided-bombay-high-court-remands-divorce-matter-to-family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":215813,"position":4},"title":"Evidence not adduced; Maintenance application not decided: Bombay High Court remands divorce matter to Family Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In a case filed by a wife (\u2018appellant') challenging the Family Court order that granted decree of divorce without giving her opportunity to adduce evidence and without deciding her interim application for maintenance, a Division Bench of A S Chandurkar and Urmila Joshi Phalke, JJ.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/cal-hc-wife-who-is-capable-of-maintaining-herself-independently-cannot-claim-alimony-pendente-lite-under-s-36-of-special-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":215813,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Wife, capable of maintaining herself independently, cannot claim alimony pendente lite under S. 36 of Special Marriage Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Biswajit Basu, J. dismissed a revision application of the filed by a lady seeking alimony pendente lite. The husband\/respondent and the wife herein had filed a matrimonial suit seeking dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce, inter alia, on the grounds of cruelty. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215813\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}