{"id":215554,"date":"2019-06-11T13:00:35","date_gmt":"2019-06-11T07:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215554"},"modified":"2019-06-19T16:33:37","modified_gmt":"2019-06-19T11:03:37","slug":"pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/","title":{"rendered":"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering"},"content":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for PMLA: <\/strong>The Tribunal chaired by Manmohan Singh, J. set aside an order restraining a woman from sale or transfer of a property, in which she was not claiming any right, title or interest.<\/p>\n

The present appeal was filed under Section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority in an Original Application (OA) whereby appellant and her associates had been restrained from sale\/ transfer of certain properties. The appellant\u2019s case was that prima facie there was no link or nexus with the accused. Her name had only been mentioned in relation to a property which she had agreed to be purchased from one Nirmala Jain. However, due to certain personal reasons on the seller\u2019s part, the sale could not be consummated. The said OA made no mention of any paper\/documents\/article or the like which had been seized and which had any connection with the appellant.<\/p>\n

Appellant\u2019s sole submission was that no cogent evidence had been provided by the ED to show that it had any link\/ nexus with any alleged accused parties. However, despite the same, she had been arrayed as a defendant in the O.A.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal noted that in the impugned order, no plea of the appellant had been referred. The appellant was not even claiming any right in the subject property. No prosecution complaint had been filed under Section 8(3)(a) of PMLA and the period of ninety days had already expired. Thus, her name ought to be deleted as the defendant from the O.A. At this juncture, counsel for respondent Atul Tripathi submitted that since the appellant was claiming no right and title in the property, her name may be deleted.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the appeal was allowed.[Alka Pahwa v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh, 2019 SCC OnLine ATPMLA 10<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for PMLA: The Tribunal chaired by Manmohan Singh, J. set aside an order restraining a woman from sale or transfer <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209880,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31584,35929,28134,6371],"class_list":["post-215554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-sale-of-property","tag-section-26-of-prevention-of-money-laundering-act","tag-title","tag-transfer-of-property"],"yoast_head":"\nPMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Appellate Tribunal for PMLA: The Tribunal chaired by Manmohan Singh, J. set aside an order restraining a woman from sale or transfer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-11T07:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-19T11:03:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/\",\"name\":\"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-11T07:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-19T11:03:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering","og_description":"Appellate Tribunal for PMLA: The Tribunal chaired by Manmohan Singh, J. set aside an order restraining a woman from sale or transfer","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-11T07:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-19T11:03:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/","name":"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","datePublished":"2019-06-11T07:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-19T11:03:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/pmla-nexus-to-transaction-must-be-proved-to-array-a-person-as-defendant-in-proceedings-for-confiscation-of-property-involved-in-money-laundering\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PMLA | Nexus to transaction must be proved to array a person as defendant in proceedings for confiscation of property involved in money laundering"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/25\/pmla-authorised-officer-under-pmla-obligated-to-show-that-seized-property-has-nexus-with-money-laundering\/","url_meta":{"origin":215554,"position":0},"title":"PMLA | Authorised officer under PMLA obligated to show that seized property has nexus with money laundering","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act: The Coram of Manmohan Singh, J. (Chairman) and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed the appeal of a person whose property, allegedly pertaining to a money laundering transaction, had been seized. An FIR was registered by the CBI in 2017 under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/04\/pmla-investigating-authority-cannot-attach-the-property-indefinitely-in-the-name-of-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":215554,"position":1},"title":"PMLA | Investigating Authority cannot attach the property indefinitely in the name of investigation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (New Delhi): A Coram of Manmohan Singh (Chairman), J. and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed an appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority for attaching property. In the instant case the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/on-procedure-and-propriety-travails-of-an-innocent-purchaser-of-tainted-property-under-the-pmla-framework\/","url_meta":{"origin":215554,"position":2},"title":"On Procedure and Propriety: Travails of an Innocent Purchaser of Tainted Property under the PMLA Framework","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Onkar Thakur\u2020, Nalin Jha\u2020\u2020 and Saksham Chaturvedi\u2020\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Innocent Purchaser of Tainted Property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/pmla-search-seizure-and-retention-of-property-pertaining-to-offence-of-money-laundering-requires-compliance-with-the-provisions-of-pmla-2002\/","url_meta":{"origin":215554,"position":3},"title":"PMLA | Search, seizure and retention of property pertaining to offence of money laundering requires compliance with provisions of PMLA, 2002","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act: A Coram of Manmohan Singh (Chairman), J. and G.C. Mishra (Member) set aside the Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order allowing retention of seized property, on the ground of non-compliance of provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. An investigation was initiated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/pmla-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-a-special-act-with-stringent-provisions-must-be-interpreted-strictly-in-the-absence-of-ambiguity\/","url_meta":{"origin":215554,"position":4},"title":"PMLA | Prevention of Money Laundering Act: A special Act with stringent provisions \u2013 must be interpreted strictly in the absence of ambiguity","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act: The Bench of Manmohan Singh, J. (Chairman) and G.C. Mishra (Member) set aside Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order allowing retention of property seized from appellant. An Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) was filed against the appellant, for acting as a mediator and helping two\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/03\/pmla-appellate-tribunal-no-extension-of-time-for-investigation-when-time-period-mentioned-in-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":215554,"position":5},"title":"PMLA Appellate Tribunal |\u00a0 No extension of time for investigation when time period mentioned in the Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering: The Coram comprising of Manmohan Singh, J. (Chairperson) and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed the appeal against the order under Section 26(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.\u00a0 The brief facts of the case are that the police report against G.S. Sawhney\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215554\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}