{"id":215522,"date":"2019-06-10T17:30:53","date_gmt":"2019-06-10T12:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215522"},"modified":"2019-06-21T12:20:08","modified_gmt":"2019-06-21T06:50:08","slug":"utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. entertained an appeal by the appellant-wife under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 against the impugned judgment granting divorce passed by Principal Judge of Family Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts giving rise to this appeal were, the respondent had filed a suit earlier under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 which was decreed already. When the marriage was solemnized between the parties, the respondent was working as a Sepoy in the Indian Army and it was a smooth sail for both of them. Subsequently, respondent-husband filed for divorce and for dissolution of marriage on the grounds that appellant was suffering from epilepsy prior to marriage and such essential fact was not disclosed to him, the appellant also suffered from different ailments which served as a hindrance, physically and mentally in their prosperous marriage. But the actual ground on which suit was filed for divorce was cruelty and desertion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that parties are living separately for a long time, the issues framed by the Family Court were sufficient to grant a divorce in this particular case. It was also observed that the Family Court found that appellant suffered from epilepsy and was treated for the same in addition to it she also suffered from tuberculosis, and such physical suffering of the appellant served as mental cruelty upon the husband. The expert opinion stated that due to such ailments the appellant was not in a fit state to conceive a child. The Court appreciated that such ailments were not relevant grounds to prove cruelty and to dissolve the marriage prime facie but non-disclosure of such important facts before marriage led to cruelty which is a proper ground for divorce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court stated that there was enough evidence before the court below to establish that there was cruelty on the part of the appellant\/wife, such as threatening the husband to falsely implicate in criminal cases and making a complaint to the superior officers of the husband. The wife had also made unnecessary allegations against the respondent before the Commanding Officer, which lowered his esteem in the eyes of his superior officer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the Court awarded permanent alimony and disposed the application of maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, it also found that there was no need to interfere with the Order of Family Court and setting aside the divorce decree.[Himani v. Rohit Bisht, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/IPON4eZ3\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Utt 448<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. entertained an appeal by the appellant-wife under Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,3060,20061,2846,2549,35920,12531,35919],"class_list":["post-215522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-Desertion","tag-dissolution-of-marriage","tag-divorce","tag-maintenance","tag-permanent-alimony","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-section-19-of-family-courts-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. entertained an appeal by the appellant-wife under Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-10T12:00:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-21T06:50:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-10T12:00:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-21T06:50:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. entertained an appeal by the appellant-wife under Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-10T12:00:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-21T06:50:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/","name":"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-10T12:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-21T06:50:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":64371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/29\/past-acts-of-cruelty-after-condonation-are-not-a-ground-to-seek-divorce-unless-revived-by-later-acts-of-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":215522,"position":0},"title":"Past acts of cruelty after condonation, are not a ground to seek divorce, unless revived by later acts of cruelty","author":"Saba","date":"August 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court's order dismissing the appellant husband's petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty, the Court observed that the law pertaining to cruelty is if by resuming cohabitation the spouse claiming victim of cruelty forgives the other spouse who commits\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/husbands-conviction-for-murder-constitutes-mental-cruelty-wife-is-entitled-to-divorce-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":215522,"position":1},"title":"Husband\u2019s conviction for murder constitutes mental cruelty; wife entitled to divorce: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo wife can live in the matrimonial relationship with the person who is so short-tampered and impulsive turned criminal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/16\/tripura-hc-what-amounts-to-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage-hc-discusses-in-case-where-the-couple-lived-apart-for-13-continuous-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":215522,"position":2},"title":"Tripura HC | What amounts to irretrievable breakdown of marriage? HC discusses in a case where the couple lived apart for 13 continuous years","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S. Talapatra and S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ., upheld the decision of the trial court and stated that the present matter is a case of an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage in light of cruelty and desertion. Cruelty & Desertion | Dissolution of Marriage Allegations of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/06\/once-cruelty-is-proved-divorce-should-be-granted-irrespective-proof-desertion-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":215522,"position":3},"title":"Cruelty and Desertion mutually exclusive; Once cruelty is proved, divorce should be granted irrespective of proof of desertion: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe embittered relationship between the husband and wife has not witnessed any moment of peace for the last more than a decade or more, and it is a marital relationship only on paper. The fact is that this relationship has broken down irretrievably long back.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/08\/decree-for-dissolution-of-marriage-by-mutual-consent-procedurally-unsound-if-not-based-on-satisfaction-of-grounds-stated-in-section-10a-of-the-divorce-act-1869\/","url_meta":{"origin":215522,"position":4},"title":"Decree for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent procedurally unsound if not based on satisfaction of grounds stated in Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. allowed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court for the said court\u2019s failure in conducting a proper enquiry and for failure in recording satisfaction based on such an enquiry conducted. The appellant and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/using-consent-for-dissolution-of-marriage-to-gain-advantage-in-other-litigations-constitute-cruelty-under-hindu-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":215522,"position":5},"title":"Using consent for dissolution of marriage to gain advantage in other litigations constitute \u2018cruelty\u2019 under Hindu Marriage Act  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. allowed an appeal filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the judgment of the Additional District Judge whereby the divorce petition filed by the husband was dismissed. One of the grounds claimed by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}