{"id":215478,"date":"2019-06-07T19:30:50","date_gmt":"2019-06-07T14:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215478"},"modified":"2019-06-10T14:12:01","modified_gmt":"2019-06-10T08:42:01","slug":"pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court:<\/strong> Chakradhari Sharan, J. dismissed an application seeking initiation of fresh acquisition proceeding under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.<\/p>\n

A certain land was acquired under the Bihar Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in the year 1979 and award was prepared in favour of landowners. Petitioner herein, who was the grandson of a landowner, stated that since the Land Acquisition Officer had not prepared any award and had simply made a roll or index of compensation amount on Form-15, the same could not be treated as a valid award.<\/p>\n

His case was that since the government had failed to make an award within two years of declaration under Section 6 of the Bihar Land Acquisition Act, the title over land remained with the owner and by virtue of Section 11-A of the said Act, entire acquisition proceeding stood lapsed. Whereas the respondent submitted that land owners were asked to receive the compensation amount, but they did not turn up to receive the same.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that acquisition proceeding had started in the year 1978-79 and all land owners were paid the amount of compensation in 1979 itself on the basis of the award so prepared. The amount payable to the petitioner\u2019s grandfather and his co-sharers was deposited by the Collector on 20-01-1981. In nearly three decades, no objection was ever raised against regularity or otherwise of the acquisition proceeding. Further, Section 18 of the Bihar Land Acquisition Act permits a person to make an application to the Collector, requiring him to refer the matter for the determination of the Court. Petitioner\u2019s grandfather never approached the Collector under the said section seeking reference of the matter to Court. Most of the land owners had accepted the award.<\/p>\n

It was observed that petitioner\u2019s raising of grievance after almost 30 years, did not appear to be bona fide. His vague statements to the effect that landholders, being layman, could not raise any claim had no credence.<\/p>\n

In view of the above-noted facts, the instant application was dismissed.[Alok Ranjan v. State of Bihar, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 465<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: Chakradhari Sharan, J. dismissed an application seeking initiation of fresh acquisition proceeding under Section 11 of the Right to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31692,35901,2728,32974,35902],"class_list":["post-215478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquisition-proceedings","tag-bihar-land-acquisition-act","tag-compensation","tag-land-owners","tag-right-to-fair-compensation-and-transparency"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: Chakradhari Sharan, J. dismissed an application seeking initiation of fresh acquisition proceeding under Section 11 of the Right to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-07T14:00:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-10T08:42:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-07T14:00:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-10T08:42:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition","og_description":"Patna High Court: Chakradhari Sharan, J. dismissed an application seeking initiation of fresh acquisition proceeding under Section 11 of the Right to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-07T14:00:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-10T08:42:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/","name":"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-07T14:00:50+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-10T08:42:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/pat-hc-claim-for-initiation-of-fresh-acquisition-proceedings-not-maintainable-where-grievance-raised-after-30-years-of-land-acquisition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Claim for initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings not maintainable where grievance raised after 30 years of land acquisition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309803,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/despite-substantial-delay-right-to-property-under-article-300a-supports-compensation-claim-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":215478,"position":0},"title":"Right to property| Calcutta High Court directs payment of compensation under Article 300A despite substantial delay","author":"Ritu","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the Municipality's possession without proper acquisition procedures is deemed illegal, and the State is directed to initiate proceedings and pay compensation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":174144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/07\/will-non-acceptance-compensation-landowner-amount-lapse-acquisition-proceedings-larger-bench-decide\/","url_meta":{"origin":215478,"position":1},"title":"Will non- acceptance of compensation by landowner amount to lapse of acquisition proceedings? Larger bench to decide","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy, JJ asked CJI to form a larger bench to decide the question as to whether by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/05\/cal-hc-grants-compensation-under-right-to-fair-compensation-and-transparency-in-land-acquisition-act-2013-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":215478,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court grants compensation after lapse of proceedings and utilisation of land for Flyover Construction","author":"Ritu","date":"February 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the previous judgments and record of rights post-vesting supports petitioners\u2019 claim for compensation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/bom-hc-systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":215478,"position":3},"title":"Acquisition without Compensation is Unconstitutional: Bombay HC criticises State over Systemic Failure in Land Acquisition Proceedings","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA large number of cases disclosed unjustified delay of nearly three decades in completing land acquisition proceedings even after taking possession of the petitioners\u2019 lands which resulted not only in grave prejudice to the landowners but also in substantial and avoidable financial burden on the public exchequer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"systemic failure in land acquisition proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346334,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":215478,"position":4},"title":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cLegislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"market value land acquisition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":129211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/05\/ssubsequent-purchasersassigneesuccessors-etc-can-seek-declaration-on-lapse-of-acquisition-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":215478,"position":5},"title":"Subsequent purchasers\/assignee\/successors, etc. can seek declaration on lapse of acquisition proceedings","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Answering an important question of law, the bench of Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the subsequent purchaser, the assignee, the successor in interest, the power of attorney, etc., are entitled to file a case for a declaration that the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}