{"id":215461,"date":"2019-06-07T13:15:05","date_gmt":"2019-06-07T07:45:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215461"},"modified":"2019-06-19T16:43:27","modified_gmt":"2019-06-19T11:13:27","slug":"nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | Claim to be a ‘financial creditor’ valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):<\/strong> A Coram of Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. (Chairperson), A.I.S. Cheema, J. (Judicial Member) and Kanthi Narhari (Technical Member) dismissed the appeal of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited claiming to be a financial creditor of Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited.<\/p>\n

The appellant, Indiabulls, had sanctioned a loan of Rs 73,23,391 in favor of the borrower, Devender Singh and Sushma Rajput vide loan agreement dated 06-04-2015. In addition a tripartite agreement dated 06-04-2015 was also executed between the appellant, respondent (Corporate Debtor) and the borrower according to which the borrowers informed the appellant about the scheme of arrangement between the borrower and the builder in terms whereof the builder assumed the liability on account of interest payable by the borrower to the IHFL during the period to be referred to as the \u201cLiability Period\u201d in terms of 24 months i.e. till 30-04-2017. The appellant has preferred this appeal challenging the order dated 30-11-2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Special Bench, New Delhi rejecting the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) filed by the appellant.<\/p>\n

The learned counsel for the appellant, Sumesh Dhawan, argued that according to the terms of the tripartite agreement, the borrower and the Corporate Debtor are jointly and severally liable for payment of the pre-equated monthly installment interest till the commencement of the equated monthly installment. The learned counsel alleged that the borrowers and the corporate debtor had defaulted in the payment of pre-equated monthly installment interest\/ equated monthly installment. The appellant claimed to be a ‘Financial Creditor’ of the respondent.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that IHFL, had disbursed the amount for consideration of time value of money in favor of borrower, Davender Singh and not to the builder and hence the Court, referring to the Sections 5 (7) and 5(8) of I&B Code, found that the Adjudicating Authority had rightly held that respondent was not the corporate debtor of the appellant and the application under Section 7 of I&B Code was not maintainable.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.[Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Rudra Buildwell Projects (P) Ltd.,\u00a0 2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 200<\/b><\/a>, decided on 14-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Coram of Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. (Chairperson), A.I.S. Cheema, J. (Judicial Member) and Kanthi Narhari <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[25934,35884,35885,35886],"class_list":["post-215461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-financial-creditor","tag-liability-period","tag-section-7-of-ib-code","tag-tripartite-agreement"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT | Claim to be a 'financial creditor' valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | Claim to be a 'financial creditor' valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Coram of Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. (Chairperson), A.I.S. Cheema, J. (Judicial Member) and Kanthi Narhari\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-07T07:45:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-19T11:13:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | Claim to be a 'financial creditor' valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-07T07:45:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-19T11:13:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | Claim to be a ‘financial creditor’ valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | Claim to be a 'financial creditor' valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | Claim to be a 'financial creditor' valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Coram of Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. (Chairperson), A.I.S. Cheema, J. (Judicial Member) and Kanthi Narhari","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-07T07:45:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-19T11:13:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/","name":"NCLAT | Claim to be a 'financial creditor' valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2019-06-07T07:45:05+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-19T11:13:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | Claim to be a ‘financial creditor’ valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/27\/nclat-financial-debt-under-section-58-ibc-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":215461,"position":0},"title":"Transition between the parties should be direct to construe the debt as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under Section 5(8) of the IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Amount taken by the Directors of the Corporate Debtor in their personal capacity cannot be construed as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under S. 5(8) of the IBC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/12\/financial-creditors-involvement-in-project-monitoring-does-not-absolve-corporate-debtors-from-repayment-obligations-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":215461,"position":1},"title":"Financial Creditors\u2019 involvement in project monitoring does not absolve Corporate Debtors from repayment obligations: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"February 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny dispute even pending in the arbitration does not in any manner prohibit the financial creditor to take remedy under Section 7 IBC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/17\/whether-a-decree-or-an-arbitral-award-or-a-settlement-deed-can-form-the-basis-of-a-financial-or-operational-debt-under-ib-code-part-iii\/","url_meta":{"origin":215461,"position":2},"title":"Whether a Decree or an Arbitral Award or a Settlement Deed can Form the Basis of a Financial or Operational Debt under IB Code [Part III]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akaant Kumar Mittal\u00b1 Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 14","rel":"","context":"In "Akaant Mittal"","block_context":{"text":"Akaant Mittal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/individual\/akaant-mittal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304400,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/nclat-rejects-claim-to-be-financial-creditor-on-mere-reflection-of-name-in-balance-sheet-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":215461,"position":3},"title":"Reflection of name in balance sheet alone does not override rejection of claim to be Financial Creditor in Liquidation Proceedings: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the appellant claimed to be a Financial Creditor as their name was included in the balance sheet of the Corporate Debtor.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/nclt-initiates-corporate-insolvency-proceedings-against-himalayan-mineral-water-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":215461,"position":4},"title":"NCLT initiates corporate insolvency proceedings against Himalayan Mineral Water","author":"Ritu","date":"June 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The application is filed by Jammu and Kashmir Bank against the Himalayan Mineral Waters Private Limited for a total financial debt of Rs. 50,04,38,456\/- for the credit facilities availed by Leel Electricals.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/financial-creditor-corporate-debtor-collaboration-agreement-default-in-payment-nclt-section-7-ibc-application-dismissed-appeal-nclat-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":215461,"position":5},"title":"Debt and default are sine qua non and only condition for admitting S. 7 IBC application: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While hearing an appeal challenging an impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dismissing a S. 7 IBC application on the ground that the appellant was not able to establish debt and default, the Tribunal held that it is clear from the facts and circumstances the definition of debt and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215461\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}