{"id":215262,"date":"2019-06-01T15:15:39","date_gmt":"2019-06-01T09:45:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215262"},"modified":"2019-06-04T12:43:39","modified_gmt":"2019-06-04T07:13:39","slug":"utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court:<\/b> Lok Pal Singh, J. allowed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for quashing the order passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) while granting an ex-parte injunction in the favour of respondents and the order passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge while rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioners.<\/p>\n

Respondents herein had filed a suit seeking a permanent\/prohibitory injunction against the petitioners herein (defendants in suit) praying that they be restrained by decree of perpetual injunction from interfering in the daily affairs of respondents\u2019 society. The trial court vide an ex-parte order granted a temporary injunction in the favour of the respondents and restrained the petitioners from entering, interfering or destroying the property in dispute. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners herein preferred an appeal which was dismissed by the appellate court. Hence, the instant petition.<\/p>\n

Rakesh Thapliyal, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the lower court had not recorded the reasons and directly came to the conclusion that, “in case ex-parte injunction is not granted, then the purpose of the plaintiff would frustrate” <\/i>and thus passed the ex-parte injunction order. In support of his contention, he placed reliance upon the judgment in the case of Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmala <\/i>Devi, (2011) 8 SCC 249<\/a>, where it was held, “\u2026.the court should grant interim injunction or stay order only after hearing the defendants or the respondents..” <\/i>On the other hand, V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents contended that the property belonged to the institute and same should be protected.<\/p>\n

The Court after perusing the impugned order observed, “the courts below have failed to exercise their jurisdiction within the parameters of law and the orders impugned in the present writ petition suffer from the aforesaid error.”<\/i> It further observed that “The trial court granted ex-parte interim injunction without any discussion, finding and the reason, and the appellate court has also done the same.”<\/i> For this, the Court also placed reliance on the case of the Supreme Court in State of Uttaranchal v. Sunil Kumar Vaish<\/i>, (2011) 8 SCC 670<\/a>, where it was held, “Judicial decisions must in principle be reasoned and the quality of a judicial decision depends principally on the quality of its reasoning.”<\/i><\/p>\n

Thus, the Court set aside the impugned order holding the same to be unsustainable in the eyes of law and ordered the trial court to decide the interim injunction application within two months, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties.[Balwant Singh Chauhan v. Mahavidyalaya Sabha Jwalapur Haridwar, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 360<\/b><\/a>, decided on 14-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J. allowed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for quashing the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14732,35783,35782,35784,9661],"class_list":["post-215262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-balance-of-convenience","tag-decree-of-perpetual-injunction","tag-ex-parte-interim-injunction","tag-judicial-decisions","tag-property-dispute"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J. allowed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for quashing the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-01T09:45:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-04T07:13:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-01T09:45:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-04T07:13:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J. allowed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for quashing the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-01T09:45:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-04T07:13:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/","name":"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-01T09:45:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-04T07:13:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/","url_meta":{"origin":215262,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction","author":"Editor","date":"February 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Ravindra Maithani, J. dismissed an appeal that challenged an order given by the court of Civil Judge pertaining to cancellation of gift deed. Appellant was aggrieved by that part of order by which an ad-interim injunction was not granted. He had purchased an agricultural property in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":278074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","url_meta":{"origin":215262,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. passed an interim order restraining Vistara Media Private Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":245201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/08\/grant-of-injunction\/","url_meta":{"origin":215262,"position":2},"title":"Megh HC | Grant of injunction cannot be claimed by a party as a matter of right nor can it be denied by the Court arbitrarily; Court dismisses petition on the question of effective possession","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H. S. Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court by way of this application under Order 6 of Meghalaya (Jurisdiction over District Council Courts) Order, 2014. The appellant claimed that he was running a hostel in a building\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/28\/extent-existence-and-expiry-of-interim-orders-a-judicial-enigma-part-i\/","url_meta":{"origin":215262,"position":3},"title":"Extent, Existence and Expiry of Interim Orders – A Judicial Enigma [Part I]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Siddharth R. Gupta\u2020 and Mayank Bansal\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 51","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/28\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-amitabh-bachchan-protecting-his-publicity-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":215262,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Amitabh Bachchan protecting his publicity rights","author":"Editor","date":"November 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Amitabh Bachchan for protection of his publicity rights against the fake Kaun Banega Crorepati (KBC) lottery fraud, the Single Judge Bench of Navin Chawla, J. granted ad-interim ex-parte injunction in favour of Amitabh Bachchan and restrained the defendants from infringing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":215262,"position":5},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}