{"id":215259,"date":"2019-06-01T14:15:28","date_gmt":"2019-06-01T08:45:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215259"},"modified":"2019-06-04T16:57:21","modified_gmt":"2019-06-04T11:27:21","slug":"ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court:<\/b>\u00a0Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the petition for amendment filed by\u00a0 <\/span>Corporation Bank, represented through Chief Manager of its Bhubaneswar branch, and directed the trial court to incorporate necessary amendment in the plaint.<\/p>\n

In the present case, defendants had availed a loan from the bank and created an equitable mortgage in respect of a part of the suit schedule property in favour of the petitioner-bank. The loan account became NPA. The bank issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (\u2018SARFAESI Act\u2019). The bank obtained an order to take possession and securities before taking delivery of possession of the equitable mortgage of land and building. After which it received a letter from the District Officer, Angul that a civil suit was sub-judice, wherein the order of status quo had been passed as the plaintiff party had instituted a suit for partition and permanent injunction impleading the defendants. The petitioner filed a petition for amendment of the cause title of the petitions stating that due to inadvertence, application was filed to implead the Chief Manager, Corporation Bank, Bhubaneswar Main Branch, Kharvel Nagar, Bhubaneswar as defendant No. 11 instead of Corporation Bank represented through Chief Manager, Bhubaneswar Main Branch, Kharvel Nagar, Bhubaneswar. The learned trial court rejected the petition on the ground that Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was not applicable for amending an application under Section 47 CPC.<\/p>\n

Learned counsel for petitioner, S.D. Das submitted that the proposed amendment was formal in nature. The same will not change the nature and character of the suit. He then placed reliance on Varun Pahwa v. Renu Chaudhary<\/i>,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine SC 300<\/a>\u00a0where Supreme Court held that the plaint had not been properly drafted, the plaintiff had been described as Varun Pahwa through Director of Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd. though it should have been Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Varun Pahwa. Thus, it was a mistake of counsel, may be on account of lack of understanding as to how a private limited company is to sue in a suit for recovery of the amount advanced. The memo of the parties was thus clearly an inadvertent mistake on the part of the counsel who drafted the plaint. It was settled that amendment in the pleadings could not be rejected on the ground of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of the rules of procedure.<\/p>\n

Hence the impugned order was set aside and the petition for the amendment was allowed, directing the trial court to incorporate necessary amendment in the plaint.[Corporation Bank v. Sailabala Pradhan, 2019 SCC OnLine Ori 186<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court:\u00a0Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the petition for amendment filed by\u00a0 Corporation Bank, represented through Chief Manager of its Bhubaneswar <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35780,35781,35779],"class_list":["post-215259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amendment-in-pleadings","tag-loan-account","tag-section-132-securitization-and-reconstruction-of-financial-assets-and-enforcement-of-security-interest-act-2012"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court:\u00a0Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the petition for amendment filed by\u00a0 Corporation Bank, represented through Chief Manager of its Bhubaneswar\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-01T08:45:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-04T11:27:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-01T08:45:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-04T11:27:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure","og_description":"Orissa High Court:\u00a0Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the petition for amendment filed by\u00a0 Corporation Bank, represented through Chief Manager of its Bhubaneswar","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-01T08:45:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-04T11:27:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/","name":"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-01T08:45:28+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-04T11:27:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/ori-hc-amendment-in-the-pleadings-cannot-be-refused-merely-because-of-some-mistake-negligence-inadvertence-or-even-infraction-of-rules-of-procedure\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Amendment in the pleadings cannot be refused merely because of some mistake, negligence, inadvertence or even infraction of rules of procedure"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/01\/ker-hc-court-entertains-art-226-petition-for-last-and-final-indulgence-where-alternate-remedy-under-sarfaesi-act-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":215259,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Court entertains Art. 226 petition for last and final indulgence where alternate remedy under SARFAESI Act available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J., disposed of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner here is the accused in the suit filed under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner took a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":215259,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253093,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/21\/factoring-regulation-amendment-act-2021-comes-into-force-on-august-23-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":215259,"position":2},"title":"Factoring Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2021 comes into force on August 23, 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ministry of Law and Justice has appointed the 23rd day of August, 2021, as the date on which the provisions of the Factoring Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2021 shall come into force vide notification dated August 19, 2021. The Parliament has enacted the Factoring Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2021 on August\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/stamp-duty-split-instrucment-once-already-charged-supreme-court-judgments-legal-law-research-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":215259,"position":3},"title":"Reduction in stamp duty cannot lead to revenue splitting an instrument into two once it has already been charged under a correct charging provision: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While dealing with a case under the Gujarat\u00a0Stamp\u00a0Act,\u00a01958, the bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*, JJ has held that once a single instrument has been charged under a correct charging provision of the Statute, namely Article 20(a), the Revenue cannot split the instrument into two, because of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":183194,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/cbdt-notifies-central-registry-securitization-asset-reconstruction-security-interest-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":215259,"position":4},"title":"CBDT notifies Central Registry for Securitization Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India","author":"Saba","date":"January 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"S.O. 283(E).\u2014In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of Section 10 of the Income tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, the Central Registry for Securitization Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India, a body set up\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252295,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/05\/insolvency-resolution-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":215259,"position":5},"title":"No bar to amendment of S. 7 IBC petition until final order; Money decree, recovery certificate in financial creditor’s favour gives fresh cause of action to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process: SC \u00a0\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Division Bench of Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. held that there is no bar in law to amendment of pleadings in an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 or to filing of additional documents apart from those initially filed, at any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}