{"id":215226,"date":"2019-05-31T18:00:38","date_gmt":"2019-05-31T12:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215226"},"modified":"2020-02-20T23:50:31","modified_gmt":"2020-02-20T18:20:31","slug":"ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0<\/strong> Lisa Gill, J. allowed the application for the refund of the fees on the ground that the matter was resolved between the parties.<\/p>\n

An appeal was filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridabad where the suit for specific performance filed by the appellant was dismissed.<\/p>\n

Rakesh Kumar Sharma, counsel for the applicant\/appellant submitted that the appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal which was filed for the specific performance as the dispute between the parties had been resolved amicably.The applicant\/appellant further prayed for the refund of the court fee.\u00a0 Reliance was placed upon the decision of Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in the case of A. Sreeramaiah v. South Indian Bank Ltd., <\/em>2006 SCC Online Kar 563<\/a> in which it was held that the matter being resolved by the parties amicably, amongst themselves without the intervention of the court, the court fees should be refunded.<\/p>\n

In the above-mentioned case, the court held that the object behind Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is to encourage the parties to arrive at the settlement. It is not important that the parties are referred to the four methods but if parties themselves at the earliest stage before the court come to the settlement, it will be considered that the object of Section 89 is achieved. The court further held that \u201cNo party should be discriminated in the matter of refund of Court Fees mainly on the ground that they have settled the dispute at the earliest stage before the court without recourse to any of the methods mentioned under Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.\u201d <\/em>Thus, the court directed the refund of the court fees appended with the appeal to the appellant. [Raj Kumar v. Gainda Devi,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine P&H 658<\/a>,\u00a0<\/b>decided on 29-5-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Lisa Gill, J. allowed the application for the refund of the fees on the ground that the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,32930,30184,31624,35768,3587,32503],"class_list":["post-215226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-court-fees","tag-dispute","tag-refund-of-fees","tag-section-89-of-civil-procedure-code","tag-settlement","tag-specific-performance"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Lisa Gill, J. allowed the application for the refund of the fees on the ground that the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-31T12:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-20T18:20:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-31T12:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-20T18:20:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Lisa Gill, J. allowed the application for the refund of the fees on the ground that the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-31T12:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-20T18:20:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/","name":"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-31T12:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-20T18:20:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":371073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":215226,"position":0},"title":"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOrder XLI Rule 23 of the CPC envisages remand in a situation in which the suit was decreed by the Court of first instance on a preliminary point and the decree is reversed in appeal by the appellate court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"refund of Court fees","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/10\/delhi-government-notifies-court-fees-delhi-amendment-act-2026\/","url_meta":{"origin":215226,"position":1},"title":"Court Fees (Delhi Amendment) Act 2026: When Can Litigants Get a Full Refund under the Revised Refund Rules?","author":"Shubhi","date":"March 10, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi Govt has notified the Court Fees (Delhi Amendment) Act 2026 revising Section 16 and removing Section 16 A to streamline the court-fee refund process.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Court Fees (Delhi Amendment) Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Court-Fees-Delhi-Amendment-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Court-Fees-Delhi-Amendment-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Court-Fees-Delhi-Amendment-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Court-Fees-Delhi-Amendment-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":215226,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication","author":"Arunima","date":"October 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the subject property deserves preservation till the appeal is decided.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"third-party rights in property dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/26\/sc-gives-quietus-to-litigation-in-matrimonial-dispute-to-ensure-that-parties-may-live-peacefully\/","url_meta":{"origin":215226,"position":3},"title":"SC gives quietus to litigation in matrimonial dispute to ensure that parties may live peacefully","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. speaking for himself and his brother Judge Uday U. Lalit, gave judgment in a civil appeal arising out of matrimonial dispute whereby the appellant challenged the decree of divorce passed by family court and affirmed by High Court of Jharkhand. The appellant-wife was married\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/22\/unstamped-and-unregistered-but-still-permitted-as-proof-for-oral-agreement-of-sale-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":215226,"position":4},"title":"Unregistered document affecting immovable property can be an admissible evidence of contract in a suit for specific performance: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In S. Kaladevi v. V.R. Somasundaram, (2010) 5 SCC 401, the Supreme Court had held that an unregistered document may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit seeking specific performance.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unregistered document","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/07\/second-appeal-fails-sikkim-hc-held-partys-willingness-to-perform-contractual-obligations-required\/","url_meta":{"origin":215226,"position":5},"title":"[Specific Performance of Contract] | Sikkim HC finds party\u2019s unwillingness for performance on their part; Discusses scope of Second Appeal under S.100 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Relying on UN Krishnamurthy v. AM Krishnamurthy, the Court stated that the appellant failed to indicate willingness to perform their part of the transaction, as they neither showed nor proved the availability of sufficient funds required to make the payments per the contract","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215226"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215226\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}