{"id":215100,"date":"2019-05-28T10:30:22","date_gmt":"2019-05-28T05:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215100"},"modified":"2019-05-31T16:59:47","modified_gmt":"2019-05-31T11:29:47","slug":"del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Accused’s application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Chander Shekhar, J. dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby he refused the petitioner’s application for supply of an advance copy of the questionnaire to enable him to file the written statement in terms of Section 313(5) CrPC.<\/p>\n

An FIR was registered against the petitioner and other co-accused persons for offences punishable under the Penal Code and the Arms Act. The matter went to trial and prosecution evidence was closed. Thereafter, the petitioner made the application as aforesaid which was rejected. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed the present revision.<\/p>\n

Ritesh Bahri and Vipin\u00a0Bansal, Advocates representing the petitioner contended that he was entitled to have an advanced copy of the questionnaire. Per contra, Ashish Dutta, APP appearing for the State supported the impugned order.<\/p>\n

The High Court was of the view:\u00a0“It is a settled law that the general rule is that, an accused must answer the questions under Section 313 of the CrPC by personally remaining present in the Court and it is only in exceptional circumstances that the general rule can be dispensed with.”\u00a0<\/strong>It was noted:\u00a0“The questions under Section 313 of the CrPC are confined to the evidence already on record, the copies whereof must have been available with the accused and his counsel by that time hence, there is no need for supplying the questionnaire in advance.”\u00a0<\/strong>In such view of the matter, it was held that there was no infirmity in the impugned order and there was no merit in the present petition, which was accordingly dismissed. [Raja v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8652<\/b><\/a>, dated 14-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Chander Shekhar, J. dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby he refused <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35666,3067,35665,30796],"class_list":["post-215100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advance-copy-of-questionnaire","tag-FIR","tag-section-3135-crpc","tag-written-statement"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Accused's application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Accused's application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Chander Shekhar, J. dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby he refused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-28T05:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-31T11:29:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Accused's application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-28T05:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-31T11:29:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Accused’s application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Accused's application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Accused's application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Chander Shekhar, J. dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby he refused","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-28T05:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-31T11:29:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/","name":"Del HC | Accused's application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-28T05:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-31T11:29:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/del-hc-accuseds-application-for-advance-copy-of-questionnaire-in-terms-of-s-3135-crpc-rejected-in-absence-of-any-exceptional-circumstances\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Accused’s application for advance copy of questionnaire in terms of S. 313(5) CrPC rejected in absence of any exceptional circumstances"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/trial-court-empowered-to-summon-material-prosecution-witness-even-at-stage-of-defence-evidence-order-passed-under-section-311-crpc-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":215100,"position":0},"title":"Trial Court empowered to summon material prosecution witness even at stage of defence evidence; order passed under Section 311 CrPC upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Surinder Gupta, J. dismissed an appeal filed against order of the trial court whereby the application filed by the prosecution under Section 311 CrPC was allowed. The petitioner was facing the trial under Section 18 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":170904,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/23\/accused-can-furnished-questions-may-asked-examination-s-313-crpc-filing-written-statement\/","url_meta":{"origin":215100,"position":1},"title":"Accused can be furnished with questions that may be asked for examination under S. 313 CrPC before filing written statement","author":"Saba","date":"November 23, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Manipur: The petition before the High Court challenged the order of a Special Court Judge who did not allow the prayer of the petitioner for supplying questions prepared by the Court for submission of written statement under Section 313 CrPC. Before the trial court, the accused (petitioner)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/23\/cal-hc-rejection-of-complaint-under-s-1563-crpc-by-magistrate-without-taking-cognizance-under-s-1901a-is-an-error-in-law-correct-approach-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":215100,"position":2},"title":"Cal HC | Rejection of complaint under S. 156(3) CrPC by Magistrate without taking cognizance under S. 190(1)(a) is an error in law; correct approach explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J., allowed a criminal revision application filed against the order of the Magistrate whereby he had rejected the petitioner's prayer under Section 156(3) CrPC to send the petition of complaint to the officer-in-charge of the police station for treating the same as first information report. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/29\/section-138-ni-act-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":215100,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Can mere ipse dixit and statement in defence under S. 313 CrPC rebut presumption cast under S. 139 NI Act? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., addressed a matter with regard to offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Instant revision petition was filed against the decision passed by the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner and affirming the Judgment of Metropolitan Magistrate convicting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/delhi-high-court-expunges-remarks-against-cbi-in-judicial-order-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":215100,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside the cost imposed on CBI and expunges remarks made against the authority in a judicial order","author":"Arunima","date":"May 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The duty of the Court has been tried to be delegated to the prosecuting agency in the present case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/23\/no-conviction-solely-based-on-accuseds-statements-under-section-313-of-crpc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":215100,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No conviction solely based on accused\u2019s statements under Section 313 of CrPC\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the impugned notice has not been produced before the Court, thus not proved, the case's foundation is wrong and thus not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}