{"id":215080,"date":"2019-05-27T17:30:06","date_gmt":"2019-05-27T12:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215080"},"modified":"2019-06-06T16:02:14","modified_gmt":"2019-06-06T10:32:14","slug":"sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/","title":{"rendered":"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: <\/strong>Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. dismissed the petition application by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the petitioner filed an application seeking restoration of her rights to Lot 2 in the Preliminary Plan by way of amending the Judgment and the Interlocutory Decree entered thereon and to permit her to file a statement of claim and proceed with the case. In the original case, the plaintiff had filed a partition application before the District Court to partition a land between plaintiff and defendants. At the preliminary survey, Pinhamy, the mother of the petitioner had claimed before the surveyor that she was unaware regarding the partition, regarding which the petitioner had filed a petition contending that her mother, Pinhamy, was unaware of the partition action. However, the learned District Judge in his own handwriting had written that Pinhamy was present in Court and journal entry to that effect had disclaimed any right to the corpus is erroneous.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted that a\u00a0 party could not appeal in dispute what the Judge had written in his own handwriting in a case record unless he had first taken up that matter before the lower Court. Here, the petitioner was not even a party to the case and\u00a0 Pinhamy did not even make such an allegation against the Judge. Relevance was placed on <em>Chaminda v. Republic of Sri Lanka,<\/em> [2009] 1 Sri LR 144, in which it was held that litigant could not make a convenient statement in court and contradict a judicial record. After trial, the Judgment had been entered and the appeal filed against the said Judgment had been dismissed by the Court in 2001. Thereafter a commission had been issued to prepare the final scheme of partition. The petitioner said that, when the surveyor came to the land for final survey, Pinhamy along with two others obstructed the surveyor to execute the commission as a part of a different land claimed by them was being surveyed, and until the surveyor showed her the Preliminary Plan and informed her of the purpose of his visit, she was unaware of the partition case; which meant that in 2003 after surveyors came she became aware of the partition case. However, the petitioner went before the Court of Appeal, 7 years after her mother became aware of the partition action. The Court noted that a person who sought restitutio integrum must act promptly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As the petitioner did not act with the utmost promptness and was not right indirectly appealing to the Court of Appeal, the application of the petitioner was dismissed.[Bandaranayaka Liyanaarachchilage Pemawathi v. Coranelis Wickremasinghe Arachchi, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/035d4I6r\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SL CA 4<\/b><\/a>, decided on 02-05-2019]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. dismissed the petition application by the petitioner. In <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[35654,31853,35653,35652,35655,35656],"class_list":["post-215080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-interlocutory-decree","tag-partition","tag-preliminary-plan","tag-restitutio-integrum","tag-statement-of-claim","tag-surveyor"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. dismissed the petition application by the petitioner. In\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-27T12:00:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-06T10:32:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/\",\"name\":\"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-27T12:00:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-06T10:32:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it","og_description":"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. dismissed the petition application by the petitioner. In","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-27T12:00:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-06T10:32:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/","name":"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-27T12:00:06+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-06T10:32:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":215080,"position":0},"title":"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal for the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Bench of M.M.A. Gaffoor, J. dismissed an appeal against an order rejecting an intervention application in a suit for partition, holding that the same was statutorily barred and because the impugned order was merely an interlocutory order. Appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":215080,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner claimed to be the owner of an un-partitioned land at plot nos. 4933, 4934, 4935 and 4936 of Mouza Sadpur, Block- Kandi,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/civil-court-jurisdiction-to-try-suit-for-title-possession-of-property-for-partition\/","url_meta":{"origin":215080,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court discusses Civil Court\u2019s jurisdiction to try suit once an application for partition is entertained by revenue authorities","author":"Editor","date":"January 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRegarding immovable properties (other than agricultural lands paying land revenue) - such as buildings, plots etc. or movable properties \u2014 where the Court can conveniently and without further enquiry make the division without the assistance of any Commissioner, or where parties agree upon the manner of division, the Court will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jurisdiction of Civil Court in parturition suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359490,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/09\/supreme-court-restates-principles-for-review-jurisdiction-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":215080,"position":3},"title":"SC restates principles on power, scope &amp; grounds for Review Jurisdiction; Sets aside Madras HC review order on daughter\u2019s status as co-parcener","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo wit through a review application, an apparent error of fact or law is intimated to the court, but no extra reasoning is undertaken to explain the said error\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Review Jurisdiction grounds","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/07\/orissa-hc-rejects-amendment-of-plaint-for-prayer-of-partition-in-27-years-old-dispute-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":215080,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Proposed changes will expand ambit of Suit\u2019; Orissa HC rejects amendment of plaint for incorporation of prayer for partition in 27-years-old dispute","author":"Editor","date":"December 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe suit was instituted in 1996 and was at the fag end of the trial. The Defendant\u2019s cross-examination was ongoing and if the proposed amendment is allowed, it will change the nature and character of the suit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294914,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/19\/sc-partition-suit-civil-court-question-of-title-fundamental-claims\/","url_meta":{"origin":215080,"position":5},"title":"In a suit for partition, Civil Court cannot go into the question of title, unless the same is incidental to fundamentals of claim: SC","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that allegations of fraud require special pleadings in terms of Order VI, Rule 4 CPC, 1908.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"partition suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/partition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/partition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/partition-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/partition-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215080"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215080\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}