{"id":215013,"date":"2019-05-24T14:30:57","date_gmt":"2019-05-24T09:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=215013"},"modified":"2019-05-27T14:43:50","modified_gmt":"2019-05-27T09:13:50","slug":"ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court<\/strong>: Devan Ramachandran, J. granted peremptory order for the payment of the recovery amount in installments.<\/p>\n

A writ petition was filed in order to question proceedings initiated and being pursued by the respondent Bank under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had to pay the overdue amount demanded by the Bank through the orders made under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Court proceeded with the writ application and stated that \u201cI am conscious that I am jurisdictionally proscribed from entering into any enquiry or consideration of the legality or otherwise of the orders impugned in this writ petition on account of the imperative statutory provisions and the binding judicial pronouncements and therefore, cannot and do not propose to consider any of the legal contentions raised by the petitioner on its merits<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

But the court after enquiring with the authorized officer for the respondent allowed the request of the petitioner and granted leniency in the payment to pay overdue amount in the installments with the strict instructions, \u201cthat directions in this judgment are peremptory in nature and that the petitioner will have to comply with the same meticulously. I caution the petitioner that no further requests for extension or modification of this judgment, save in exceptional circumstances, will be permitted and that if the petitioner fails to comply with the directions herein, she will lose the benefit of this judgment and she will also be foreclosed from challenging the measures\/proceedings taken by the Bank under the SARFAESI Act and impugned in this writ petition before any other alternative Forum or Court\u201d.<\/em>[Sreeja v. Trissur District Co-Operative Bank Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 1602<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: Devan Ramachandran, J. granted peremptory order for the payment of the recovery amount in installments. A writ petition was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32831,35624,35625,31385],"class_list":["post-215013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-installments","tag-peremptory-order","tag-recovery-amount","tag-securitization-and-reconstruction-of-financial-assets-and-enforcement-of-securities-interest-act-2002"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Devan Ramachandran, J. granted peremptory order for the payment of the recovery amount in installments. A writ petition was\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-24T09:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-27T09:13:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-24T09:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-27T09:13:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties","og_description":"Kerala High Court: Devan Ramachandran, J. granted peremptory order for the payment of the recovery amount in installments. A writ petition was","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-24T09:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-27T09:13:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/","name":"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-24T09:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-27T09:13:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":215013,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/01\/ker-hc-court-entertains-art-226-petition-for-last-and-final-indulgence-where-alternate-remedy-under-sarfaesi-act-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":215013,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Court entertains Art. 226 petition for last and final indulgence where alternate remedy under SARFAESI Act available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J., disposed of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner here is the accused in the suit filed under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner took a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206827,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/14\/jurisdictionally-bereft-from-hearing-matter-under-sarfaesi-act-on-merits-kerala-hc-allows-defaulter-to-repay-bank-in-installments\/","url_meta":{"origin":215013,"position":2},"title":"Jurisdictionally bereft from hearing matter under SARFAESI Act on merits, Kerala HC allows defaulter to repay bank in installments","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Devan Ramachandran, J. was seized of a civil writ petition filed by a defaulter challenging proceedings initiated by the respondent bank against him under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). The Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200024,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/","url_meta":{"origin":215013,"position":3},"title":"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed challenging the order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, and remanded the matter back to be heard on merits. The petitioner filed an application under Section 17(1) of Securitization and Reconstruction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":178884,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/28\/no-proceedings-including-art-226-entertained-action-taken-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":215013,"position":4},"title":"No proceedings including that under Art 226 should be entertained against action taken under SARFAESI Act","author":"Saba","date":"December 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Division Bench comprising of Dharam Chand Chaudhary and Vivek Singh Thakur, JJ., dismissed a civil writ petition observing that no proceedings should be entertained against action taken under SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petitioner Society filed the petition praying that Respondent 3 Bank be restrained\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/20\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-due-to-having-an-alternative-and-efficacious-remedy-under-s-17-of-the-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":215013,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Editor","date":"May 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. dismissed the writ petition in view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioners under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.\u00a0 The instant writ petition was filed by the borrowers for quashing the order dated 15-03-2022 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}