{"id":214934,"date":"2019-05-23T10:30:22","date_gmt":"2019-05-23T05:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214934"},"modified":"2019-05-27T17:53:12","modified_gmt":"2019-05-27T12:23:12","slug":"del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition filed by the allottee of the subject shop who was charged with an offence punishable under Section 447 (punishment for criminal trespass)\u00a0<\/em>IPC, and quashed the order whereby the charge was farmed against him.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was the allottee of the subject shop. It was alleged by the respondent that the petitioner had agreed to rent out the shop to him and had demanded a sum of Rs 50,000 to be paid in advance, after the payment of which the petitioner handed over the keys to him. The respondent, in his complaint filed under Section 200 CrPC, alleged that the petitioner, however, did not remove his articles from the shop with malafide intentions. And on 27-02-2011, while the complainant was getting the woodwork done, the petitioner broke the lock and trespassed into the shop.<\/p>\n

Aditya Madan, Advocate for the petitioner contended that the trial court erred in framing the charge and not appreciating there was the allottee of and in possession of the shop. Per contra, Subodh Kumar Pathak, Advocate for the respondent supported the impugned order.<\/p>\n

The High Court noted that admittedly, the petitioner was the allottee of the shop. The respondent did not produce any evidence to corroborate that any tenancy was created in his favour or the possession was handed over to him. It was observed: “<\/strong>Section 447 is punishment for Criminal Trespass which is defined under Section 441 to be committed when a person enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person in possession of such property. The impugned order clearly is erroneous in as much as the Trial Court has framed the charge on the presumption that the complainant was in possession of the shop at that time. As there is no material to show that possession was parted with by the petitioner or handed over to the complainant, petitioner could not have been charged with the offence under Section 447 IPC.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

In such view of the matter, the petition was allowed and the charge framed against the petitioner was quashed. [Jagdish Kapila v. Raj Kumar, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8617<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-05-2019]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition filed by the allottee of the subject shop who was charged with an offence <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35576,35577,35575,9741,7921],"class_list":["post-214934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-punishment-for-criminal-trespass","tag-section-200-crpc","tag-section-447-ipc","tag-tenancy","tag-tenant"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition filed by the allottee of the subject shop who was charged with an offence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T05:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-27T12:23:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-23T05:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-27T12:23:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition filed by the allottee of the subject shop who was charged with an offence","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-23T05:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-27T12:23:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/","name":"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-23T05:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-27T12:23:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/del-hc-charge-of-criminal-trespass-under-s-447-ipc-by-person-claiming-to-be-tenant-not-maintainable-in-absence-of-proof-of-tenancy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Charge of criminal trespass under S. 447 IPC by person claiming to be tenant not maintainable in absence of proof of tenancy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/30\/gau-hc-proof-of-ownership-and-possession-of-land-precondition-for-establishing-charge-of-criminal-trespass\/","url_meta":{"origin":214934,"position":0},"title":"Gau HC | Proof of ownership and possession of land precondition for establishing charge of criminal trespass","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate whereby he had acquitted the accused-respondents of the charges under various sections of IPC including Section 447\u00a0(punishment for criminal trespass). The complainant-appellant had alleged that the accused came in a group\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":234893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/27\/jhar-hc-%e2%94%82-mere-fact-that-dispute-relates-to-title-of-land-will-not-make-it-civil-dispute-if-basic-ingredients-of-ss-427-447-ipc-are-met\/","url_meta":{"origin":214934,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Mere fact that dispute relates to title of land will not make it civil dispute if basic ingredients of Ss. 427, 447 IPC are met","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary J., upheld the findings of the impugned judgment and modified the sentence to meet the ends of justice. The facts of the case are that the complainant was a sole owner of a piece of land acquired by the complainant from its erstwhile owner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/08\/ker-hc-criminal-proceedings-initiated-for-non-compoundable-offences-can-be-quashed-by-invoking-power-under-s-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214934,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Criminal proceedings initiated for non-compoundable offences can be quashed by invoking power under S. 482 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: R. Narayana Pishardi, J. allowed a petition seeking the quashing of prosecution proceedings in view of the settlement of the matter between the petitioners and the respondent. The petitioners and some other persons had trespassed into the second respondent's property and threatened her and committed theft of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":359873,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/bom-hc-on-leading-additional-evidence-in-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":214934,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Failed to show due diligence during trial\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses plea to lead additional evidence at appellate stage","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The case was pending before the Magistrate for almost 10 years, but during that entire period, the petitioner did not make any effort to examine the allottee as a witness. This clearly showed lack of due diligence by the petitioner during the trial before the Magistrate.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"additional evidence in appeal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/additional-evidence-in-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/additional-evidence-in-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/additional-evidence-in-appeal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/additional-evidence-in-appeal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286184,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/complaint-criminal-proceeding-house-trespass-criminal-intimidation-abetment-ipc-quashment-bank-employee-authorized-duty-revision-allowed-calcutta-high-court-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214934,"position":4},"title":"Entry of authorised Bank employee in secured property premises for taking possession doesn’t fall under “House Trespass”: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While quashing the impugned criminal proceeding against the petitioners, the Court held that a defaulter borrower holds the secured asset only in trust or symbolic possession and even if the petitioners have entered the said property, the same cannot be marked out as trespassers in other's' property.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/03\/madras-hc-quashes-charges-over-mahatma-gandhi-statue-damage\/","url_meta":{"origin":214934,"position":5},"title":"\u2018TNPPDL Act doesn\u2019t cover private land\u2019; Madras HC quashes charges in Mahatma Gandhi statue damage incident at school","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Trial Court, shall not act like a post master that receives the final report from the Police and blindly proceed to frame charges on the premise that the final report would be perfect in all respects.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mahatma Gandhi statue damage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Mahatma-Gandhi-statue-damage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Mahatma-Gandhi-statue-damage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Mahatma-Gandhi-statue-damage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Mahatma-Gandhi-statue-damage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214934"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214934\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}