{"id":214929,"date":"2019-05-23T09:30:59","date_gmt":"2019-05-23T04:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214929"},"modified":"2019-05-27T13:21:35","modified_gmt":"2019-05-27T07:51:35","slug":"megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/","title":{"rendered":"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Meghalaya High Court:<\/b> H.S. Thangkhiew, J.<b><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><b> <\/b>directed respondents 1 and 2 to substitute the name of petitioner in place of the deceased wife and directed them to communicate the same with respondent 3 for issuance of authorization for payment of pension.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The deceased husband of the petitioner worked as havaldar under respondent 2 and retired from service. After the death of his first wife, he married the petitioner, and out of the wedlock a female child was born. Thereafter the deceased employee had filed a representation to the authorities for the inclusion of the name of the petitioner and the child for the benefit of pension, but the said representation was not replied leading to the filing of a Writ Petition for necessary directions. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, he expired, after which the said writ petition was withdrawn and petitioner being lawfully wedded wife filed this petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned counsel of the petitioner S. Bhattacharjee, submitted that the petitioner should not be denied the pension as of Note (2) of Rule 48 of the Meghalaya Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1983, permits post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement to be eligible for family pension. She further submitted that respondents had admitted the request of family pension and had informed the Accountant General.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned Additional Senior GA appearing on behalf of respondents 1 &amp; 2 did not refute the submissions. He further referred to the letter issued by the Office of the Accountant General, wherein it was stated that change of nomination for family pension the deceased would depend upon the orders passed by this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As there was no dispute regarding the marital status of the petitioner with regards to the deceased employee, it was directed that the name of the deceased wife be substituted with the name of the petitioner and same to be communicated to respondent 3 for issuance of authorization for payment of pension. The name of the child out of the said wedlock was also to be inserted.[Marcyana N. Marak v. State of Meghalaya, <b><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/64EGs4O8\">2019 SCC OnLine Megh 89<\/a>,<\/b> decided on 15-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J.\u00a0 directed respondents 1 and 2 to substitute the name of petitioner in place of the deceased <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2898,35572,35573,2785],"class_list":["post-214929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Family_Pension","tag-note-2-of-rule-48-of-the-meghalaya-civil-services-pension-rules-1983","tag-post-retiral-spouses","tag-retirement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J.\u00a0 directed respondents 1 and 2 to substitute the name of petitioner in place of the deceased\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T04:00:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-27T07:51:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/\",\"name\":\"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-23T04:00:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-27T07:51:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0","og_description":"Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J.\u00a0 directed respondents 1 and 2 to substitute the name of petitioner in place of the deceased","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-23T04:00:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-27T07:51:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/","name":"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-23T04:00:59+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-27T07:51:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":28921,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/09\/second-wife-of-a-deceased-government-employee-is-qualified-to-claim-family-pension-without-requiring-to-produce-her-marriage-certificate\/","url_meta":{"origin":214929,"position":0},"title":"Second wife of a deceased government employee is qualified to claim family pension without requiring to produce her marriage certificate","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 9, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: While considering an interesting issue that whether the second wife of the deceased government employee is entitled to claim the family pension without production of her marriage certificate, the bench of Hariparanthaman, J., held that the petitioner (wife) is entitled to claim the family pension without requiring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":199006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/25\/family-pension-denied-to-second-wife-as-marriage-was-solemnized-during-subsistence-of-first-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":214929,"position":1},"title":"Family pension denied to second wife as marriage was solemnized during subsistence of first marriage","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of denial of family pension to the petitioner. Husband of the petitioner was in the Police Department under State of Meghalaya. After his death, the petitioner claimed family pension.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":249806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/15\/jhar-hc-is-the-second-wife-of-an-ex-employee-entitled-to-family-pension-court-answers-in-light-of-instant-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":214929,"position":2},"title":"Jhar HC | Is the second wife of an ex-employee entitled to family pension? Court answers in light of instant facts","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Dwivedi, J., dismissed the petition and directed the petitioner to apply for the family pension of the dependents before the competent authority in accordance with law. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition for quashing the part of the letter dated 21-02-2011 issued by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/10\/high-court-emphasizes-on-role-of-welfare-state-directs-authorities-to-release-pension-and-death-cum-retiral-benefits-within-60-days-or-pay-interest-thereon-from-your-own-pockets\/","url_meta":{"origin":214929,"position":3},"title":"Patna High Court emphasizes on role of Welfare State; directs authorities to \u201crelease pension and death-cum-retiral benefits\u201d","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. while hearing a civil writ petition filed by a widow for payment of family pension and death cum post retiral benefits, came down heavily upon the State for the prolonged delay in making payment and emphasized on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":214929,"position":4},"title":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRule 50 of the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980 is with intend to give relief to the woman becoming wife. Under such circumstances, even the wife from the second marriage was made entitled for family pension.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/right-to-pension-immediately-after-retirement-calcutta-high-court-directs-payment-of-retiral-benefits-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":214929,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Right to get pension immediately after retirement is a recognised right\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs payment of retiral benefits","author":"Ritu","date":"January 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that any wrong deductions from the petitioner's salary should not defeat the rightful claim for pension, a recognized right immediately after retirement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214929\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}