{"id":214905,"date":"2019-05-21T17:30:32","date_gmt":"2019-05-21T12:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214905"},"modified":"2019-05-23T13:05:06","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T07:35:06","slug":"cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Calcutta<\/strong><strong> High Court: <\/strong>Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner claimed to be the owner of an un-partitioned land at plot nos. 4933, 4934, 4935 and 4936 of Mouza Sadpur, Block- Kandi, Khatian No. 714, P.O. &amp; P.S. Kandi, Pin 742 137, District- Murshidabad, West Bengal. On 10-02-2019 the petitioner came to learn that the private respondents were demolishing the structures existing on the said property. The petitioner maintained that without taking steps towards the partition of the said property and without obtaining any appropriate sanction plan from the municipal authorities, the private respondents had started raising unauthorized construction including a boundary wall. Aggrieved thereby, this petition was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court had passed an interim order on 26-02-2019 restraining the private respondent&#8217;s 14 to 20 from demolishing any structure existing on the said property and from raising any fresh construction till the end of April, 2019 or until further orders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent 14 by filing an affidavit-in-opposition and a vacating application stated that a partition suit pertaining to the said property, being T.S. No. 38 of 2003, was initially filed by Amala Bala Ghosh impleading the petitioner herein. The final decree was passed on 17-01-2014. The said decree was executed and the 3 parties obtained possession of the decretal property in the year 2014. Thereafter, the names of the respondent&#8217;s 14 and 15 were mutated and some portions of the said property had also been sold to third parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In reply, the petitioner submitted that he had no knowledge about the institution of the said partition suit and the preliminary decree and the final decree were passed ex parte.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, in view of the arguments made by the parties, held that the said property had already been partitioned and hence no direction could be passed in the present writ petition. The Court observed that the grievance of the petitioner was that he was not given appropriate notice for which he could not appear and contest the partition suit. It was opined that such grievance ought to have been ventilated by the petitioner before the competent civil forum. But without taking such steps the petitioner had preferred the present writ petition involving the municipal authorities. In view thereof, the petition was dismissed.[Dr Kashinath Ghosh Hazra v. State of West Bengal, An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed on 19-02-2019, <em>In re<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4aAAHFV0\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Cal 655<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court: Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31370,35560,2713,31976,5622,13551],"class_list":["post-214905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-competent-civil-forum","tag-decree","tag-ex-parte","tag-partition-suit","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-21T12:00:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T07:35:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-21T12:00:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-23T07:35:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-21T12:00:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-23T07:35:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","name":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-21T12:00:32+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-23T07:35:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217026,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":214905,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for restraining private persons from encroaching of the suit property of the petitioner. The petitioner herein had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/14\/writ-court-cannot-direct-police-assistance-in-cases-involving-disputed-questions-of-title-and-possession-of-property-where-an-interim-order-of-civil-court-is-in-operation-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214905,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Writ court cannot direct police assistance in cases involving disputed questions of title and possession of property","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and N. Anil Kumar, JJ. dismissed a petition seeing mandamus for police assistance in relation to a disputed property holding that a writ court could interfere in matters involving civil rights. Dispute between the parties centered on the ownership\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/18\/delhi-high-court-air-india-not-state-under-article-12-employees-public-employment\/","url_meta":{"origin":214905,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court| Air India not \u2018State\u2019 under Article 12 after privatization; Employees of Air India Limited no longer fall within the domain of \u2018public employment\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"August 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a writ cannot be issued against a Government- entity which has been subsequently privatized and no longer performs any public duty.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/police-cannot-interfere-in-a-civil-case-unless-directed-by-a-competent-court-hyderabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":214905,"position":3},"title":"Police cannot interfere in a civil case unless directed by a competent Court: Hyderabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Hyderabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Gudiseva Shyam Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition at the admission stage on account of it being misconceived. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the relief in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/raj-hc%e2%94%82petition-under-art-226-cannot-be-entertained-where-an-alternate-statutory-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":214905,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Petition under Art. 226 cannot be entertained where an alternate statutory remedy is available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. dismissed the writ petition filed against the order passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies-cum Registrar Institution exercising the powers inferred upon him under Section 24 of the Rajasthan Sports (Registration, Recognition and Regulation of Association) Act, 2005. The respondent had issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/09\/lok-adalat-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":214905,"position":5},"title":"Sikk HC | Can Award of the Lok Adalat be assailed by way of a petition under Arts. 226 and\/or 227 of Constitution? Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ. allowed a writ petition which was filed assailing the updated Award passed by the Lok Adalat though signed on 26-06-2015. The facts were that petitioner 1 was the wife of Defendant 1 in the suit and petitioners 2 and 3 were his sons.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214905\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}