{"id":214898,"date":"2019-05-21T15:30:31","date_gmt":"2019-05-21T10:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214898"},"modified":"2019-05-21T11:50:08","modified_gmt":"2019-05-21T06:20:08","slug":"mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Vivek Agarwal, J. while hearing two miscellaneous appeals analogously, refused to exonerate the Insurance Company and modified the impugned award of the claimant by an enhancement of Rs 70,378\/-.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A miscellaneous appeal was filed by New India Insurance Company Limited challenging the award dated 04-02-2015 on two grounds, namely that the driver of the offending vehicle was not having licence to drive a commercial vehicle, namely &#8216;Vikram&#8217; bearing No. MP-07-R-1602 and therefore, Insurance Company should have been exonerated of its liability and secondly, the accident took place when the claimant Faiziya Khan was crossing the road and therefore, aspect of contributory negligence should have been taken into consideration. While, the appellant-Faiziya Khan, had filed an appeal to enhance the award passed in order to compensate her for her injuries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The learned counsel for the insurance company, Mr Shrinivas Gajendragadkar, put forth a two-fold argument that firstly, the driver of the offending vehicle did not have a license to drive a commercial vehicle; and secondly, that the claimant was negligent in crossing the road. The counsel further relied upon <em>Halki Bai v. Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation<\/em>, 2004(3) T.A.C. 821(M.P.), to support his contention that since claimant was crossing the road negligently, therefore, it will be a case of contributory negligence. The claimant, Faiziya Khan, on the other hand, maintained that the award passed in her favor was inadequate as compared to her injuries and pains and needed to be enhanced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court dismissed the appeal by the insurance company observing that the <em>Halki Bai v. Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation<\/em>, 2004 (3) T.A.C. 821(M.P.), was not applicable here as in the present case it has been mentioned in a report that the accident took place due to fault in the steering of auto. In view thereof, it was held that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the claimant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also cited <em>Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/D0nW3Rgx\">(2017) 14 SCC 663<\/a> in which the Court had held that if a driver is holding the license to drive a light motor vehicle, he can drive a transport vehicle of such class without any endorsement. By relying on the aforementioned judgment, the Court refused to exonerate the Insurance Company on the lack of endorsement of the driver.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ruling on the claimant&#8217;s appeal, the Court modified the impugned award by enhancement of Rs 70,378 in favor of the claimant by increasing the compensation for livelihood, transport and future treatment.[New India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mohd. Ajiz, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5k9QdgC3\">2019 SCC OnLine MP 818<\/a>, decided on 08-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Agarwal, J. while hearing two miscellaneous appeals analogously, refused to exonerate the Insurance Company and modified the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34427,2728,35558,25753,3301],"class_list":["post-214898","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-claimant","tag-compensation","tag-impugned-award","tag-insurance-company","tag-liability"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Agarwal, J. while hearing two miscellaneous appeals analogously, refused to exonerate the Insurance Company and modified the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-21T10:00:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-21T10:00:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Agarwal, J. while hearing two miscellaneous appeals analogously, refused to exonerate the Insurance Company and modified the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-21T10:00:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/","name":"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-21T10:00:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/mp-hc-plea-seeking-exoneration-of-liability-of-insurance-company-rejected-and-impugned-award-enhanced\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Plea seeking exoneration of liability of insurance company rejected and impugned award enhanced"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/08\/chh-hc-impugned-order-absolving-the-liability-on-insurance-company-was-set-aside-due-to-erroneous-dismissal-of-application-under-order-8-rule-13-cpc-regarding-production-of-license\/","url_meta":{"origin":214898,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | Impugned order absolving the liability on insurance company was set aside due to erroneous dismissal of application under Order 8 Rule 1(3) CPC regarding production of license","author":"Editor","date":"December 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., set aside the impugned order and fastened the liability for compensation on the insurance company. The facts of the case are such that on 16-11-2008 at about 06:30 p.m. Respondent 1\/ claimant was travelling on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":153054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/30\/transporter-being-an-agent-of-the-owner-of-property-cannot-claim-compensation-under-s-166-mv-act-for-damage-to-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":214898,"position":1},"title":"Transporter being an agent of the owner of property cannot claim compensation under S. 166, MV Act for damage to property","author":"Saba","date":"August 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While delivering the judgment in a miscellaneous first appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a Single Judge Bench of Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J. set aside the impugned judgment and award passed by the IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge whereby he directed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/31\/mv-act-kar-hc%e2%94%82-will-absence-of-any-specific-endorsement-in-driving-license-absolve-the-insurance-company-of-its-liability-to-pay-compensation-award-revised\/","url_meta":{"origin":214898,"position":2},"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC\u2502 Will absence of any \u2018specific endorsement\u2019 in driving license absolve the insurance company of its liability to pay compensation? Award revised","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Ashok G. Nijagannavar, J., upheld the compensation order but revised the rate of interest to meet the ends of justice. The facts of the case are such that the claimant was travelling as an inmate of the autorickshaw and sustained injuries in the motor vehicle accident pursuant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":363337,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ori-hc-cuts-rpf-constables-accident-compensation-to-rs-7-10-lakh\/","url_meta":{"origin":214898,"position":3},"title":"Orissa HC rejects planted vehicle claim; Modifies compensation to Rs 7.10 Lakh for injured RPF Constable","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe claimant stated that he incurred heavy medical expenses and suffered disability, resulting in a downgrade from B-1 to C-1 position and a monthly income loss of Rs 7,000, and therefore sought enhancement through a cross-objection.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constable accident compensation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Constable-accident-compensation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Constable-accident-compensation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Constable-accident-compensation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Constable-accident-compensation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/11\/mv-act-compensation-jharkhand-hc-directs-truck-owner-compensate-gratuitous-passenger\/","url_meta":{"origin":214898,"position":4},"title":"MV Act Compensation | Jharkhand High Court directs Truck owner to compensate gratuitous passenger","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The claimant was a passenger travelling in the truck, but the claimant did not state about any of his loaded goods in the statement or having taken the truck on hire","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/kar-hc-insurer-directed-to-pay-compensation-awarded-to-claimants-and-thereafter-recover-it-from-owner-of-the-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":214898,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Insurer directed to pay compensation awarded to claimants and thereafter recover it from owner of the vehicle","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.T. Narendra Prasad, J. while allowing the appeal in part and condoning the delay ordered that the claimant was not entitled to the interest for the delayed period of 358 days. This Miscellaneous First Appeal was filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking enhancement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214898","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214898"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214898\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}