{"id":214882,"date":"2019-05-20T17:30:36","date_gmt":"2019-05-20T12:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214882"},"modified":"2019-05-23T13:11:29","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T07:41:29","slug":"all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh, J., released the accused on probation by granting him the benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were that the accused was booked under Sections 323, 452 and 326 IPC and was convicted by the Trial Court in this regard. Shiv Ganesh Singh, Advocate on behalf of the appellant, submitted that since the appellant was not convicted previously for any offence, the Trial Court ought to have invoked the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. It was further submitted that the Trial Court did neither invoke the provisions of the Act, 1958 nor the provisions of Section 360 CrPC while sentencing the accused-appellant. Neither did it give any special reason in the impugned judgment and order of conviction for not giving the benefit of provisions of Section 360 CrPC or the provisions of Act, 1958. Thus the order suffered from serious illegality being violative of provisions of Section 361 CrPC and, therefore, it cannot be sustained. Section 361 of the Code is required to be applied with or without the beneficial provisions i.e. Section 360 of the Code or provisions of the Act, 1958. It was further stated that if the Court chose not to apply either of these provisions, it was required to give special reasons for not applying the beneficial provision otherwise accused offender would be eligible for provisions of Section 360 of the Code or Section 3 or 4 of the Act, 1958. The accused-appellant had a statutory right for claiming the benefit of beneficial legislation.<\/p>\n

The Court, in view of the facts and circumstances, held that the appeal should be dismissed by upholding the conviction of the accused-appellant. However, he was granted the benefit of Section 4 of the Act, 1958. He was released on probation. [Durgesh Chandra v. State of U.P, 2019 SCC OnLine All 2176<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh, J., released the accused on probation by granting him the benefit of Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30436,33572,35541,35540,35542,4571],"class_list":["post-214882","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-convict","tag-impugned-judgment","tag-section-360-crpc","tag-section-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act","tag-statutory-right","tag-trial"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh, J., released the accused on probation by granting him the benefit of Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-20T12:00:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T07:41:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-20T12:00:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-23T07:41:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh, J., released the accused on probation by granting him the benefit of Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-20T12:00:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-23T07:41:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/","name":"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-20T12:00:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-23T07:41:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/all-hc-convict-given-benefit-of-s-4-of-probation-of-offenders-act-where-trial-court-did-not-record-special-reasons-for-holding-otherwise\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Convict given benefit of S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act where trial court did not record special reasons for holding otherwise"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223447,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/21\/hp-hc-s-361-crpc-mandates-court-to-record-special-reasons-for-not-dealing-with-the-accused-under-provisions-of-probation-of-offenders-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":214882,"position":0},"title":"HP HC | S. 361 CrPC mandates court to record special reasons for not dealing with the accused under provisions of Probation of Offenders Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Anoop Chitkara, J. upheld the decision of the first appellate court in the present case where the court on its own motion took cognizance of the complaint concerning the release of the respondent under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 after his conviction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/04\/utt-hc-stating-provisions-of-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-the-court-cancels-the-remaining-sentence-of-the-convict-modifies-order-in-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":214882,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Stating provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 the Court cancels the remaining sentence of the convict; modifies order in appeal","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: R.C. Khulbe, J., partly allowed an appeal that was filed aggrieved by the Judgment and order passed by Addl. Sessions Judge whereby he had convicted the appellant-Resham Singh under Section 224, Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced him to undergo two years\u2019 R.I. with a fine of Rs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":46231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/12\/report-of-probation-officer-to-be-called-before-granting-probation-under-section-42-of-probation-of-offenders-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":214882,"position":2},"title":"Report of Probation officer to be called before granting probation under Section 4(2) of Probation of Offenders Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 12, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Deciding an appeal against the sentence awarded by the trial court on ground of its inadequacy, a single judge bench of A.I.S. Cheema, J., has observed that while granting benefit of probation, courts shall ensure compliance of provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, and when probation is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242786,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/25\/s-6-of-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-is-mandatory-in-nature-which-acts-as-an-injunction-for-courts-to-follow-supreme-court-clarifies-legal-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":214882,"position":3},"title":"S. 6 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is mandatory in nature, which acts as an injunction for Courts to follow; Supreme Court clarifies legal position\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul* and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ., has observed that Section 6 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 leaves no discretion to the Court as it provides, \u201cA Court \u2018must not\u2019 sentence a person under the age of 21 years to imprisonment unless sufficient\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207224,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/delhi-hc-discusses-philosophy-behind-grant-of-probation-and-exercise-of-power-under-probation-of-offenders-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":214882,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC discusses philosophy behind grant of probation and exercise of power under Probation of Offenders Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed an application for release on probation filed by a convict suffering imprisonment for offence under Sections 411 and 482 IPC. The appellant was alleged to have robbed a car by forcibly removing its keys and a sum of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":315686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/raj-hc-grants-probation-to-accused-persons-convicted-u-s-307-of-ipc-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":214882,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court grants probation to accused persons convicted u\/s 307 of IPC in thirty-three-year-old case","author":"Arushi","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe main object of sentencing a convicted person is to bring in him certain character reformation and to keep him away from the society so as to see that the impact of his criminal character does not put any adverse impact on any other person.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214882"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214882\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}