{"id":214867,"date":"2019-05-20T12:30:45","date_gmt":"2019-05-20T07:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214867"},"modified":"2019-05-28T16:14:44","modified_gmt":"2019-05-28T10:44:44","slug":"pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of Pakistan: <\/strong>A Full Bench of Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Sardar Tariq Masood and Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, JJ. allowed a petition to charge Standard(Penal) Rent against unauthorized retention of government accommodation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the concerned case, the respondent filed a petition before the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) on 10-07-2006 before his retirement on 09-10 2006 praying that he should be allowed to retain the official accommodation after his retirement. He submitted that as his pension, GP Fund and other dues had not been paid, he was not in a position to rent a new house and, therefore, requested to retain the official accommodation in question for a period of six months. The Tribunal issued a stay order in the case and it was listed for final hearing in 2010 almost after 3 years. Till that time, the respondent continued to live in the official accommodation and then withdrew his petition before the date of final judgment. As regards to the decision of penal rent for the term extending 6 months, the Tribunal observed that the respondent was not liable to pay Penal Rent but only the regular rent as his was living in the official accommodation due to the stay order granted by the Tribunal. Aggrieved by the judgment of the Tribunal, an application has been filed in the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned counsel for the applicant Mr Izharhul Haq contended that there is a clear abuse of power and process in the present case. The respondent had lived in the official accommodation for more than six months and was hence, liable to pay Penal rent for a term exceeding 6 months. He further said that the respondent had no convincing argument and kept hiding behind the stay order granted by the Tribunal. He also submitted that the petition of respondent in the Tribunal was not even maintainable in terms of Article 212(3) of the Constitution as it does not raise any substantial question of law of public importance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned counsel for the respondent Mr Hafiz Tariq Nasim said before the Court that the respondent was only living in the official accommodation in light of the stay order which was granted by the Tribunal. The respondent had no intention to defeat the provisions of any law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court after listening to both the parties observed that as per Article 212(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked only if the Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law of public importance. It is to be seen that whether the question of law transcends the facts of the individual case and is substantial enough to have a significant bearing on the public interest. Thus, the remedy under Article 212(3) is not an appeal in the ordinary sense of the word but is a unique constitutional jurisdiction that is to be exercised if the question of law raised before the Court impinges on the rights of the public or a segment of public or a community of civil servants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The question as to whether a civil servant can unauthorizedly retain official accommodation beyond a period of six months without paying penal rent requires interpretation of the Accommodation Allocation Rules, 2002; and thus the same constitutes a substantial question of law of public importance because the decision by this Court would affect all those civil servants who are subject to the said Rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court opined that as per the rules, the respondent could have retained official accommodation after his retirement only for a period of six months and thereafter he was liable to pay standard rent for the remaining period. The stay order granted by the Tribunal was insignificant in the instant case as it was not decided on merits and was finally withdrawn by the respondent, resulting in the withdrawal of the stay order, as if it never existed. For the above reasons this appeal was allowed and order passed by the Tribunal was set aside. Appellant Department was entitled to recover Standard Rent from the respondent.[Secretary Revenue Division, Islamabad v. Iftikhar Ahmed Tabassam, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/C4Em43AM\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Pak SC 5<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of Pakistan: A Full Bench of Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Sardar Tariq Masood and Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, JJ. allowed a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":66141,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[35521,35520,35522,35517,2785,35519,35518],"class_list":["post-214867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-accommodation-allocation-rules-2002","tag-article-2123-of-the-constitution-of-islamic-republic-of-pakistan","tag-federal-service-tribunal","tag-government-accommodation","tag-retirement","tag-standardpenal-rent","tag-unauthorized-retention"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Pakistan: A Full Bench of Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Sardar Tariq Masood and Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, JJ. allowed a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-20T07:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-28T10:44:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/\",\"name\":\"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-20T07:00:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-28T10:44:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition","og_description":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: A Full Bench of Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Sardar Tariq Masood and Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, JJ. allowed a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-20T07:00:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-28T10:44:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/","name":"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-20T07:00:45+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-28T10:44:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/pak-sc-interim-order-of-a-tribunal-passed-without-hearing-the-same-on-merits-would-be-believed-to-have-never-existed-if-the-petitioner-withdraws-the-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pak SC | Interim order of a Tribunal passed without hearing the same on merits, would be believed to have never existed, if the petitioner withdraws the petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":268891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/23\/j-union-of-india-v-omkar-nath-dhar-2022-1-scc-40-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":214867,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC| Government accommodations are meant for serving officers and not retirees; Union of India v. Omkar Nath Dhar, (2022) 1 SCC 40, reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deciding the instant petition filed by 3 retired State Bank of India employees, who had retained their respective government accommodations and were aggrieved with the rent being charged at commercial rate; the bench of Sindhu Sharma, J., dismissed the petition on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/08\/penal-rent-can-be-levied-adjusted-against-the-dues-payable-including-gratuity-if-an-employee-occupies-a-quarter-beyond-the-specified-period-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214867,"position":1},"title":"Penal rent can be levied &#038; adjusted against the dues payable including gratuity if an employee occupies a quarter beyond the specified period: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The observation came in a case where a SAIL employee had retained a quarter after his retirement due to non-payment of retiral benefits.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273980,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/19\/chhattisgarh-high-court-chhattisgarh-accommodation-control-act-2011-rent-lease-open-land-chhattisgarh-rent-control-tribunal-rent-controlling-authority-accommodation-article-227-constitution-of-ind\/","url_meta":{"origin":214867,"position":2},"title":"Chhattisgarh High Court| Provisions of the Chhattisgarh Accommodation Control Act, 2011 would also be applicable upon the property taken on rent or lease, even if it is open land","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, after being aggrieved by the order passed by Chhattisgarh Rent Control Tribunal (Tribunal), wherein the Tribunal has affirmed the order dated 13.02.2020 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Raipur (Authority), the division bench of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200435,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/","url_meta":{"origin":214867,"position":3},"title":"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a writ petition against the order of Respondent 5. The said order directed the petitioner to vacate the government accommodation given to him, by or before 08.08.2018. The main issue, in this case, was whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":350936,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/delhi-hc-directs-mp-govt-release-retiral-dues-late-ias-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":214867,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court directs MP Govt to release retiral dues of late IAS officer who was repeatedly victimised even after death","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis case presents a sad and shocking state of affairs, a disturbing pattern wherein an officer was being repeatedly victimized, not only after his superannuation but also after his death.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/without-following-due-process-of-law-recovery-of-penal-rent-from-the-employees-of-air-india-limited-who-occupy-air-india-colony-is-unlawful-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":214867,"position":5},"title":"Recovery of penal rent from Air India employees for occupying Air India Colony held unlawful: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that without following due process of law, no penal rent could be deducted from the salaries of the employees of Air India Limited who failed to vacate the allotted accommodation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214867\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/66141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}