{"id":214847,"date":"2019-05-18T16:25:36","date_gmt":"2019-05-18T10:55:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214847"},"modified":"2019-05-23T13:23:53","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T07:53:53","slug":"utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. contemplated a writ petition filed in pursuant to the order passed by Court in 2019, which directed the Project Director to prepare a set of instructions, in consultation with the concerned officials, for effective implementation of the Mid-day Meal Scheme, directed each school to strictly adhere thereto, and\u00a0 periodical inspections to be caused by a separate inspection staff with a view to satisfy himself that the funds earmarked for this Scheme were not misappropriated, an affidavit was filed by the Project Director enclosing thereto the Government Order in this regard.<\/p>\n

The petitioner i.e. the Project Director in the affidavit stated that, immediately after the Government Order was issued, the Secretary and School Education had issued directions to all District Magistrates of Uttarakhand for implementation of the said guidelines.<\/p>\n

Siddharth Sah, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that, Principals of the said schools where lapse were noticed and implementation of Scheme was ineffective, were let off with a mere adverse entry. The counsel was satisfied with the guidelines issued by State, but highlighted certain loopholes as well in the practical approach.<\/p>\n

The Court observed considerable force in the submissions of the petitioner and noted that undue leniency was shown to those who failed to discharge the duties entrusted to them, of effective implementation of the Scheme, which may well embolden others to be negligent or to misutilize funds earmarked for the Scheme. The Court advised to take more stringent disciplinary actions against the concerned Principals and officers. It directed the first respondent to consider giving wide publicity to the guidelines now framed for effective implementation of the Scheme, so that all stakeholders are made aware of the duties which those, in charge of the Scheme, were required to discharge.<\/p>\n

The Court further held, \u201cin the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court would, ordinarily, not sit in judgment over the decision of the competent authority in imposing punishment. We see no reason, therefore, to now direct the authorities to impose a more stringent punishment on the Principal concerned.<\/em>\u201d[Somendra Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 359<\/b><\/a>, decided on 14-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. contemplated a writ petition filed in pursuant to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32988,10081,12981,32725,35511],"class_list":["post-214847","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226-of-the-constitution-of-india","tag-competent-authority","tag-judgment","tag-mid-day-meal-scheme","tag-stringent-punishment"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. contemplated a writ petition filed in pursuant to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-18T10:55:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T07:53:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-18T10:55:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-23T07:53:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. contemplated a writ petition filed in pursuant to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-18T10:55:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-23T07:53:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/","name":"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-18T10:55:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-23T07:53:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-sit-in-judgment-over-decision-of-competent-authority-in-imposing-stringent-punishment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":257953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/01\/not-open-for-courts-to-usurp-function-of-disciplinary-authority-cant-substitute-one-disciplinary-punishment-with-other-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214847,"position":0},"title":"Not open for Courts to usurp function of disciplinary authority; Can’t substitute one disciplinary punishment with other: SC","author":"Editor","date":"December 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Ajay Rastogi* and Abhay S. Oka, JJ., \u00a0\u00a0 set aside the judgment of the Delhi High Court wherein it had substituted the penalty of removal from service with confinement of respondent from 1.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. in quarter guard jail without noticing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311194,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/raj-hc-s357a-of-crpc-rajasthan-victim-compensation-scheme-applicable-to-incidents-occurred-prior-their-enactment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214847,"position":1},"title":"Section 357A of CrPC and Rajasthan Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011 are applicable to incidents occurred prior to their enactment: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere women are honoured, divinity blossoms there and where women are dishonoured, all actions no matter how noble remain unfruitful.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211329,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/04\/pat-hc-order-punishing-violation-of-mid-day-meal-scheme-norms-unsustainable-where-no-evidence-considered-by-disciplinary-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":214847,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Order punishing violation of mid-day meal scheme norms \u2013 unsustainable where no evidence considered by disciplinary authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Madhuresh Prasad, J. allowed a petition challenging order directing withdrawal of pay increments, holding that enquiry into the matter was done without considering relevant materials. Petitioner, while working as in-charge officer of mid-day meal scheme in Khagaria, was proceeded against under charge memo alleging\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":340963,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/11\/punjab-haryana-hc-directs-flat-allotment-slum-dweller-arbitrarily-disqualified-from-chandigarh-small-flats-scheme\/","url_meta":{"origin":214847,"position":3},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC orders flat allotment to slum dweller who was arbitrarily disqualified from Chandigarh Small Flats Scheme","author":"Editor","date":"February 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner\u2019s exclusion from the definition of \u2018recognised resident\u2019 appeared to be done through an ill-informed order with reasons not based on any cogent evidence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/29\/treatment-of-mucormycosis\/","url_meta":{"origin":214847,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Treatment of Mucormycosis including administration of Amphotericin injection is free of cost and the entire cost will be borne by the State Government in public hospitals","author":"Editor","date":"June 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Chief Justice Abhay S Oka and Aravind Kumar J. gave a slew of directions regarding Chamarrajanagar Incident, Mucormycosis, Vaccination, oxygen supply and food security. \u00a0CHAMARAJANAGAR INCIDENT \u00a0 The issue of enhancement of compensation to the families of 24 victims of Chamarajanagar hospital tragedy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/28\/departmental-punishment-of-government-servant\/","url_meta":{"origin":214847,"position":5},"title":"P&H HC | Departmental punishment of government servant is not a necessary and automatic consequence of conviction on a criminal charge","author":"Editor","date":"March 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Jaishree Thakur, J. set aside and quashed the dismissal of the petitioner and remanded back the matter to the punishing authority for reconsideration. The Court directed that punishing authority to apply its mind and to form an opinion as to whether the conviction of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214847\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}