{"id":214831,"date":"2019-05-18T10:30:28","date_gmt":"2019-05-18T05:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214831"},"modified":"2019-05-23T18:14:07","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T12:44:07","slug":"del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0A Bench of Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the prosecutrix under Section 372 CrPC challenging the trial court’s judgment whereby the accused was acquitted of the charge of rape.<\/p>\n

Simran Sadyora and Sanjeev Bhatia, Advocates, representing the prosecutrix, submitted that the trial court failed to appreciate that there is a presumption under Section 114-A of the Evidence Act as to absence of consent in a case for prosecution of the offence under Section 376 IPC and consequently the onus to prove that he had not committed the offence under Section 376(2)(n) had shifted to the accused.<\/p>\n

At the outset, the High Court observed:\u00a0“the presumption under Section 114-A of the Evidence Act would only be attracted if the factum of sexual intercourse is proved.”\u00a0<\/strong>It was noted that the prosecutrix had refused an internal medical examination. the Court was also of the opinion that her testimony was highly unreliable, untrustworthy and inspired no confidence. It was noted further that the delay in registering FIR was not successfully explained. Also, she made 529 calls to the accused between the dates of the alleged rape and filing of the complaint.\u00a0Her acts were inconsistent with her allegations.\u00a0<\/em>Moreover, the factum of sexual intercourse remained not proved. Keeping on view such and other findings, the Court held that the accused was entitled to be given benefit of doubt. Hence, the appeal was dismissed. [Rachna Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8519<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the prosecutrix under Section 372 CrPC <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2572,35499,21594,13431,23834],"class_list":["post-214831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Rape","tag-section-114-a-evidence-act","tag-section-372-crpc","tag-section-376-ipc","tag-sexual-intercourse"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the prosecutrix under Section 372 CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-18T05:00:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T12:44:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-18T05:00:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-23T12:44:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the prosecutrix under Section 372 CrPC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-18T05:00:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-23T12:44:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/","name":"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-18T05:00:28+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-23T12:44:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/del-hc-presumption-under-s-114-a-of-evidence-act-to-be-attracted-only-when-facts-of-sexual-intercourse-is-proved\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Presumption under S. 114-A of Evidence Act to be attracted only when facts of sexual intercourse is proved"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/21\/del-hc-convicts-father-friend-under-s-377-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214831,"position":0},"title":"‘To sexually violate innocent child within filial relationship descends on different path of depravity’: Del HC convicts father, friend under S. 377 IPC; emphasises on ingredients of ‘carnal intercourse against the order of nature’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Siddharth Mridul and Anup Jairam Bambhani, JJ., while addressing a very unfortunate incident, involving sexual offences to the extent of rape and carnal intercourse with a child, expressed that, \u201c\u2026to sexually violate an innocent child is in any case an abhorrent act; but,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/02\/bom-hc-not-necessary-for-rape-accused-to-disprove-absence-of-consent-beyond-reasonable-doubt-conviction-for-rape-quashed-for-lack-of-proof\/","url_meta":{"origin":214831,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Not necessary for rape accused to disprove absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt; conviction for rape quashed for lack of proof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Rohit B. Deo, J. allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence of committing rape repeatedly on the same woman punishable under Section 376(1)(n) IPC along with the offence punishable under Section 506 (criminal intimidation).\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/27\/rape-accused-acquitted-in-light-of-failure-to-conduct-dna-test-that-could-be-a-clinching-evidence-to-prove-the-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":214831,"position":2},"title":"Rape accused acquitted in light of failure to conduct DNA test that could be a clinching evidence to prove the case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., reversed the judgment of the trial court where the appellant was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to 5 years of rigorous imprisonment. The appellant was accused of committing forcible sexual intercourse on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/all-hc-20-yrs-in-jail-for-no-reason-hc-reverses-conviction-of-rape-accused-directs-matter-to-be-placed-before-cj-for-considering-periodical-listing-of-appeals-of-those-in-jail-for-more-than-10-or\/","url_meta":{"origin":214831,"position":3},"title":"All HC | 20 yrs in jail for no reason? HC reverses conviction of rape accused; Directs matter to be placed before CJ for considering periodical listing of appeals of those in jail for more than 10 or 14 yrs\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Gautam Chowdhary, JJ.,\u00a0has requested the Registrar (Listing) through the Registrar General to place the matter before the Chief Justice that periodical listing of matters be taken up in the High Court so that those who are in jail\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240040,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/02\/del-hc-can-an-hiv-positive-patient-be-prosecuted-for-an-offence-of-attempt-to-murder-if-he-had-sexual-intercourse-without-womans-consent-read-detailed-ruling-of-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214831,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Can an HIV positive patient be prosecuted for an offence of attempt to murder, if he had sexual intercourse without woman’s consent? Read detailed ruling of HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bakhru, J., observed that If an HIV positive person is aware of their condition and has unprotected sex, the person can be punished under Section 270 of Penal Code, 1860. Appellant was convicted by the trial court under Sections 376\/313\/307 of Penal Code, 1860. Appellant was found\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/29\/tri-hc-consent-obtained-for-intercourse-on-false-promise-of-marriage-attracts-s-90-ipc-conviction-for-rape-under-s-376-ipc-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":214831,"position":5},"title":"Tri HC | Consent obtained for intercourse on false promise of marriage attracts S. 90 IPC; conviction for rape under S. 376 IPC upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0Sanjay Karol, CJ, dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the decision of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC committing rape on the prosecutrix. The prosecution alleged that the appellant made sexual relations with the prosecutrix, who was of unstable mind, on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214831\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}