{"id":214773,"date":"2019-05-17T15:40:56","date_gmt":"2019-05-17T10:10:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214773"},"modified":"2019-05-23T14:27:14","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T08:57:14","slug":"utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: Alok Singh, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by Sahak Nagar Adhikari, who was Public Information Officer under Right to Information Act, 2005.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that, a show cause notice was issued upon him which sought an explanation as to why a penalty should not be imposed upon him for providing delayed information. He gave a brief reply of the said notice and administered information to the said officer. Thereafter, State Information Commissioner adjudged the matter and imposed a penalty of Rs 25,000 for delayed reply to the notice. He was aggrieved by the said order of the officer and therefore sought justice from the Court.<\/p>\n

Mr Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that impugned order of the Information Officer was arbitrary and patently illegal, hence, was not maintainable. He argued that impugned order was \u2018unreasonable\u2019 and \u2018non-speaking\u2019, the officer failed to justify the penalty as he gave a brief reply as to why the delay was caused by him for discharging his duties. He relied on the judgment of Supreme Court, in Narendra Kumar v. CIC<\/em>, 2014 (2) UD 72 where it was observed, \u201cState Public Information Officer has decided any complaint or appeal without any reasonable cause, refused to receive an application for information or has not furnished information within the time etc., in that event penalty can be imposed. In the further opinion of this Court, if there was reasonable cause for furnishing the delayed information then Chief Information Commissioner should not impose penalty merely because there was some delay in supplying the information.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n

The Court observed that judgment in case Narendra Kumar<\/em> was not applicable in the aforementioned case, as in the referred case information was not supplied in time because of natural disaster but in the case of petitioner there was delay of one year in supply of the information whereas Act, 2005 mandates to provide information within thirty days. Cause shown by the petitioner for delay in supplying the information was the excessive workload. The Court stated that, petitioner has not explained his excessive work; this was no ground for the delay in providing the information. One year delay in providing information under the Right to Information Act was too high.<\/p>\n

It further held that Commissioner has assigned the reason for the penalty. \u201cProviding information after one year that too on filing of appeal in the State Information Commission amounts to denial of information<\/em>.\u201d Court found no illegality or perversity in the impugned order and directed the petitioner to pay the aforementioned penalty.[Chandrakant Bhatt v. Uttarakhand Information Commission, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 356<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Singh, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by Sahak Nagar Adhikari, who was Public Information Officer under Right <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35478,32044,35479,3659,2627,35477,13821,35476],"class_list":["post-214773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-filing-of-appeal","tag-impugned-order","tag-no-perversity","tag-notice","tag-Penalty","tag-public-information-officer","tag-rti-act","tag-state-information-commission"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Singh, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by Sahak Nagar Adhikari, who was Public Information Officer under Right\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T10:10:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-23T08:57:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-17T10:10:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-23T08:57:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Singh, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by Sahak Nagar Adhikari, who was Public Information Officer under Right","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-17T10:10:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-23T08:57:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/","name":"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-17T10:10:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-23T08:57:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/utt-hc-furnishing-information-beyond-the-mandate-amounts-to-denial-of-information-by-officer-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Furnishing information beyond the mandate amounts to denial of information by officer under RTI Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/16\/rti-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":214773,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Delay in providing information under RTI Act does not amount to penalty, if valid reasons for the delay are proved; Court sets aside the penalty","author":"Editor","date":"March 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J., partly allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by the State Information Commissioner by which a penalty of 25,000 had been imposed upon the petitioner for not providing timely information to respondent 2. The application, under Section 6 (1) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/05\/treating-rbi-governor-as-deemed-cpio-cic-issues-show-cause-notice-for-non-disclosure-of-wilful-defaulters-of-bad-loans\/","url_meta":{"origin":214773,"position":1},"title":"Treating RBI Governor as deemed CPIO, CIC issues show cause notice for non-disclosure of “wilful defaulters of bad loans”","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhy is RBI fighting tooth and nail to defend defaulters?\u201d Central Information Commission (CIC): A Bench comprising of Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu issued a show-cause notice to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Urjit Patel holding him as deemed Public Information Officer (PIO) responsible for non-disclosure of a list of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":104221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":214773,"position":2},"title":"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld","author":"Saba","date":"February 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A fine of Rs. 25,000 was imposed by the Central Information Commission on Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of Indian Council of Agricultural Research. The applicant had applied for seeking the information under the RTI Act, 2005 about Project Directorate on Foot and Mouth Disease, its contents, costs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6782,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/17\/penalty-of-rs-25-000-imposed-upon-two-information-officers-for-repeated-non-compliance-of-orders-of-cic\/","url_meta":{"origin":214773,"position":3},"title":"Penalty of Rs 25,000 imposed upon two information officers for repeated non-compliance of orders of CIC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC): In a case relating to a dispute of ownership of 20 bighas of land in Delhi worth around Rs 100 crore, CIC imposed a maximum penalty of Rs 25,000 on two public information officers (PIOs) for repeated non-compliance of order of the First Appellate Authority and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":166144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/inordinate-delay-replying-rti-applications-amounts-harassment\/","url_meta":{"origin":214773,"position":4},"title":"Inordinate delay in replying to RTI applications amounts to harassment","author":"Saba","date":"October 31, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission: In a recent case before CIC, appellant pleaded that he had received the information after issue of notice of the hearing from the CPIO of the department\u00a0\u00a0concerned and requested for award of compensation on account of the disadvantage suffered by him due to the unjustifiable delay of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","url_meta":{"origin":214773,"position":5},"title":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy’ and \u2018non-speaking’, Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}