{"id":214692,"date":"2019-05-15T16:00:59","date_gmt":"2019-05-15T10:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214692"},"modified":"2019-05-17T11:14:13","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T05:44:13","slug":"mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/b>: Vivek Rusia, J. allowed a petition seeking the issue of Custom Broker License and eventually quashed orders of Commissioner of Customs.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Petitioner contended that his application for grant of \u2018Custom House Agent License\u2019 under Custom House Agent Regulations, 2004 was rejected by the aforementioned officer. The issue of the said license was based on written and oral examination and both were successfully cleared by the petitioner, further, the relevant amount was paid. He further contended that, meanwhile when results were not declared a new Custom Broker License Regulations, 2013 was enforced. By the said Regulation the nomenclature of \u2018Custom House Agents\u2019 was changed to \u2018Custom Brokers\u2019. It was clarified that applicants who have already passed under Regulations of 2004 shall not be required to reappear for any further examination and were eligible to apply for License. Petitioner applied for the relevant license before the appropriate authorities in conformity with the law.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The counsel for the petitioner, Alok Barthwal, submitted that application of the said petitioner was rejected by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, on the ground that petitioner did not file an application within a period of two months from the date of declaration of the results. The learned counsel placed reliance on relevant provisions of Regulations, 2013 where it was clarified that the new Regulations doesn\u2019t apply in the petitioner\u2019s case, but the same was rejected by the respondent. After being aggrieved by order of Deputy Commissioner the petitioner submitted his request to Chief Commissioner of the said department, request of the petitioner was turned down again with advice to appeal before the Tribunal with respect to said rejection. Petitioner requested the Chief Commissioner for passing a reasoned and speaking order so that he can prefer an appeal before the Tribunal. Learned counsel further urged that the petitioner applied for grant of Customs House Agent License under Regulation, 2004 in which there was no time limit for submitting the application by an applicant who has passed the examination, hence denial of grant of license on basis of delay is not justified.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents argued in support of the impugned orders passed by the respondents by submitting that orders have been passed in accordance with the provision of the Regulation, 2014. Therefore, the petitioner is liable to be dismissed. He further highlighted the said provision \u201cGrant of Licence – <\/i><\/b>The Commissioner of Customs shall, on payment of a fee of five thousand rupees grant license in Form B to an applicant who has passed the oral examination within two months of the date of declaration of the said results.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n

The petitioner preferred an appeal to CESTAT, New Delhi which was dismissed. The Tribunal held, \u201cthat the appeal lies only against the judicial order but not against the order passed on administrative side<\/i>.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court observed that, no person shall carry on business as an Agent unless he holds a license granted under these Regulations. The Commissioner of Customs invites application for grant of such license in the month of January of every year by means of a notice affixed on the notice board. Individual, Firm or Company can apply for the issuance of license of Customs House Agent subject to fulfillment of the condition given in the Regulation.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court held, the respondents are giving a wrong interpretation for those applicants who have passed the examination and did not submit an application for grant of license within a period of two months. Hence, there can’t be a two months period for submitting the application for grant of license. The Court directed that petitioner was only liable to pay the required fees because an application for grant of license was already been submitted under Regulation, 2013. \u201cThe Language of Regulation 7 is plain and simple and according to which, the Commissioner of Customs shall grant a license in Form-B within a period of two months on payment of fees by an applicant who has passed the oral examination<\/i>.\u201d The respondents were directed to issue the license as the order was not maintainable.\u00a0<\/span>[Sanjay Kumar Joshi v. CCE, 2019 SCC OnLine MP 803<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-05-2019]\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. allowed a petition seeking the issue of Custom Broker License and eventually quashed orders of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35419,35418,35421,35422,35420],"class_list":["post-214692","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-commissioner-of-customs","tag-custom-broker-license","tag-grant-of-license","tag-interpretation-of-provisions","tag-payment-of-fees"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. allowed a petition seeking the issue of Custom Broker License and eventually quashed orders of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-15T10:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T05:44:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-15T10:30:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-17T05:44:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. allowed a petition seeking the issue of Custom Broker License and eventually quashed orders of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-15T10:30:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-17T05:44:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/","name":"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-15T10:30:59+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-17T05:44:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/mp-hc-awry-interpretation-of-relevant-provisions-by-authority-forms-basis-of-quashing-of-orders\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Awry interpretation of relevant provisions by Authority forms basis of quashing of orders"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/26\/license-under-customs-house-agents-licensing-regulations-to-be-invalid-if-licensee-is-inactive-for-1-year-notified-vide-customs-brokers-licensing-amendment-regulations-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":214692,"position":0},"title":"License under Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations to be invalid, if licensee is inactive for 1 year, notified vide Customs Brokers Licensing (Amendment) Regulations, 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Board of Indirect Taxes (CBIC) with effect from July 23, 2021 has notified the Customs Brokers Licensing (Amendment) Regulations, 2021. The CBIC has amended the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 in the following manner: \u00a0 Insertion of Regulation 8A, Surrender of License: A Licensee may surrender the license\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Central-Board-of-Indirect-Taxes.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Central-Board-of-Indirect-Taxes.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Central-Board-of-Indirect-Taxes.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Central-Board-of-Indirect-Taxes.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Central-Board-of-Indirect-Taxes.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269177,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/28\/single-jurisdiction-single-membership-rule-applied-to-customs-brokers-vide-customs-brokers-licensing-amendment-regulations-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":214692,"position":1},"title":"Single jurisdiction single membership rule applied to Customs Brokers vide Customs Brokers Licensing (Amendment) Regulations, 2022","author":"Editor","date":"June 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"On 24th June, 2022, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) notified Customs Brokers Licensing (Amendment) Regulations, 2022. The amendment revises the provisions of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, being effective from its publication.\u00a0\u00a0 Key Points:\u00a0 Any agent or broker who intends to make any business transactions on behalf\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CBIC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53551,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/application-for-the-grant-of-arms-license-cannot-be-rejected-on-vague-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":214692,"position":2},"title":"Application for the grant of Arms License cannot be rejected on vague grounds","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: While dealing with the question relating to grant of Arms license, the Court quashed the order of State Government of rejecting the application of Petitioner for grant of Arms License. The Petitioner in this case had filed an application before the Commissioner of Police,\u00a0Cyberabad Commissionerate which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291264,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/04\/bombay-high-court-upholds-municipal-commissioner-decision-to-not-permit-activity-of-serving-hookah-and-herbal-hookah-by-using-burnt-charcoal-in-restaurant-with-eating-house-license-legal-update-resear\/","url_meta":{"origin":214692,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court upholds Municipal Commissioner’s rejection of serving Hookah\/Herbal Hookah at a restaurant with an eating house license","author":"Arunima","date":"May 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that the canvass of Section 394 of the MMC Act, is quite broad to take within its ambit articles, trade, and operations, which are dangerous to life, and health or which are likely to create a nuisance, as quite extensively described in the provision.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271492,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/10\/rajasthan-high-court-no-appeal-can-be-preferred-challenging-the-issuance-of-an-arms-license-in-favour-of-any-person-under-s-18-arms-act-1959\/","url_meta":{"origin":214692,"position":4},"title":"Rajasthan High Court | No appeal can be preferred challenging the issuance of an arms license in favour of any person under S. 18 Arms Act, 1959","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Vijay Bishnoi, J. held the appeal filed by District Magistrate before Divisional Commissioner under Section 18 of Arms Act, 1959 challenging the issuance of arms license in favour of the petitioner who was the holder of license, as non \u2014 maintainable. The petitioner applied for an arms\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/12\/delhi-high-court-delhi-police-well-within-jurisdiction-to-issue-show-cause-to-restaurant-serving-alcohol-beyond-permissible-limits-writ-petition-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":214692,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court: Delhi police well within jurisdiction to issue show cause to restaurant serving alcohol beyond permissible limits; Writ petition not maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jasmeet Singh, J. did not interfere with the impugned show cause notice issued by Delhi Police to a restaurant allegedly serving alcohol beyond permissible limit of 1 am and as to why its registration should not be cancelled for such repeated acts of omission and commission. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214692","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214692"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214692\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214692"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214692"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214692"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}