{"id":214638,"date":"2019-05-14T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-05-14T07:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214638"},"modified":"2019-05-17T18:10:25","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T12:40:25","slug":"raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners against an order passed by Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institution Tribunal, Jaipur (the Tribunal).<\/p>\n

In the instant case, during the pendency of a charge sheet leveling four charges against the respondent, the petitioners passed a resolution inter alia <\/em>compulsorily retiring the respondent under the provisions of Section 16 (1) of the Rajasthan Non-Government Education Institutions Act, 1989. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent approached the Tribunal by filing an appeal which was allowed. In its impugned judgment, the Tribunal quashed the order of compulsory retirement passed by the petitioners holding it illegal. It also ordered for reinstatement of the respondent with all the consequential reliefs including salary and other benefits. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed the instant writ petition assailing the order of the Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The learned counsel for the petitioners, Dr Nupur Bhati and Abhishek Mehta, contended that the Tribunal was not justified in passing the impugned order as, “the burden was on the respondent to prove that he was unemployed from the date of his compulsory retirement till reinstatement, which was not proved.”<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court observed that “the petitioners were bent upon relieving the respondent from service and, therefore, applied the procedure of compulsory retirement, which was not justified.”\u00a0 <\/em>Reliance was placed on the judgment in State of Gujarat v. Umedbhai M. Patel, <\/em>(2001) 3 SCC 314<\/a>, where certain principles regarding compulsory retirement were laid down. The Court observed that the petitioners acted contrary to those principles, and held that “from the material which came on record, it was apparent that the order of compulsory retirement was passed as a shortcut to avoid departmental enquiry which was already pending and the same was imposed as a punitive measure by the petitioners and in those circumstances the order was clearly contrary to principles (vi) & (viii) above, the findings of the Tribunal qua the wrongful exercise of power of compulsory retirement cannot be faulted.” <\/em><\/p>\n

Regarding justification of consequential reliefs, it was held that “..during the intervening period as a temporary employee got engagement with some institution cannot be a reason for the petitioners to deny the payment of back salary and other benefits once it is found that their action was against the law and the order of compulsory retirement was passed only with an intention to ease out the respondent from employment during pendency of enquiry.” <\/em><\/p>\n

In the view of the above, the Court dismissed the petition holding that the same was devoid of substance.[Chopasni Shiksha Samiti v. Gajendra Singh, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 430<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 09-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners against an order passed by Rajasthan Non-Government Educational <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3612,30150,35378,35379],"class_list":["post-214638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-charge_sheet","tag-enquiry","tag-order-of-compulsory-retirement","tag-rajasthan-non-government-educational-institution-tribunal"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners against an order passed by Rajasthan Non-Government Educational\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-14T07:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T12:40:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-14T07:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-17T12:40:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners against an order passed by Rajasthan Non-Government Educational","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-14T07:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-17T12:40:25+00:00","author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/","name":"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-14T07:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-17T12:40:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/04\/acquittal-criminal-case-disciplinary-proceeding-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":214638,"position":0},"title":"Acquitted in the criminal case but employer still going ahead with the disciplinary proceeding? Read the law laid down by Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The purpose of a disciplinary proceeding by an employer is to enquire into an allegation of misconduct by an employee which results in a violation of the service rules governing the relationship of employment.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","url_meta":{"origin":214638,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) challenging a judgment passed by the single judge of the present court. In the instant case, the respondent-writ petitioner was appointed in the service of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/postal-officer-fraud-voluntary-deposit-removal-from-service-punishment-supreme-court-legal-law-news-judgments-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":214638,"position":2},"title":"Delinquent postal officer voluntarily deposits defrauded amount with interest after detection of fraud. Was he able to escape punishment of removal from service? SC decides\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a Postal Assistant was accused of committing a fraud of Rs.16,59,065\/- but had voluntarily deposited the defrauded amount along with penal interest, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the same cannot be a ground to interfere with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-136-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-136-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-136-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-136-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-136-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/pecuniary-loss-to-government-not-necessary-to-initiate-departmental-proceeding-against-an-employee-after-his-retirement-from-the-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":214638,"position":3},"title":"Pecuniary loss to Government not necessary to initiate departmental proceeding against an employee after his retirement from the service","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dealing with the question as to whether departmental proceeding can be initiated against an employee after his retirement from service on attainment of the age of superannuation for a charge sheet issued to him at the time of his employment, the bench of J.S. Khehar and Arun Mishra,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/supreme-court-after-holding-departmental-enquiry-prior-approval-of-director-of-education-must-be-obtained-for-terminating-employee-of-a-recognised-institution\/","url_meta":{"origin":214638,"position":4},"title":"Recognised institution’s employee can’t be terminated without prior approval of Director of Education; Supreme Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that prior approval of the Director of Education is mandatory as per Section 18 of the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989, on termination after the disciplinary proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":259593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/06\/courts-should-emphasize-on-bridging-the-gap-between-the-time-period-of-reservation-and-delivery-of-judgment\/","url_meta":{"origin":214638,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Courts should emphasize on bridging the gap between the time period of reservation and delivery of the judgment","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sheel Nagu and Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, JJ., allowed the petition while hearing an appeal against the order against the order passed by the Jabalpur bench of the central administrative tribunal in O.A. No.697\/2014 on 17-01-2020 in the matter where the application preferred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214638"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214638\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}