{"id":214581,"date":"2019-05-13T12:00:11","date_gmt":"2019-05-13T06:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214581"},"modified":"2019-05-17T15:08:37","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T09:38:37","slug":"del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Siddharth Mridul, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 assailing an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant’s bail application was rejected.<\/p>\n

The appellant was standing trial under Sections 18, 18-B and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. M.S. Khan and Prashant Prakash, Advocates representing the appellant asserted that he was entitled to be released on bail\u00a0ex debito justitiae.\u00a0<\/em>Per contra, Ravi Nayak, Assistant Public Prosecutor appeared for the State.<\/p>\n

At the outset, the High Court observed that relevant provision of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, in relation to grant of bail to an accused person is enunciated as a\u00a0non-obstante\u00a0<\/em>clause, which clearly and unequivocally postulates:\u00a0“if the Court is of the opinion that, there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against such person are prima facie true, he shall not be released on bail.”\u00a0<\/strong>Further, the provision stipulates that the restrictions contained in Section 437 (1) CrPC, are also applicable.<\/p>\n

The order on charge led the Court to an inescapable conclusion that of a\u00a0prima facie <\/em>involvement of the appellant in grave and serious offences which attract a sentence that may extend to imprisonment for life upon conviction. Furthermore, a perusal of the report under Section 173 CrPC filed against the appellant and the circumstance that he was declared a ‘proclaimed offender’ in the present proceedings, as well as, his propensity to furnish fabricated documents, suffice in our view to believe that, he represents a flight risk.<\/p>\n

In such view of the matter, no interference with the impugned order was warranted, and consequently, the appeal was dismissed. [Syed Mohd. Zishan Ali v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8396<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-04-2019]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Siddharth Mridul, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 assailing an order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,35356,35355,19881],"class_list":["post-214581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-national-investigation-agency-act-2008","tag-section-173-crpc","tag-unlawful-activities-prevention-act"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Siddharth Mridul, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 assailing an order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-13T06:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T09:38:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-13T06:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-17T09:38:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Siddharth Mridul, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 assailing an order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-13T06:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-17T09:38:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/","name":"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-13T06:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-17T09:38:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":224308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/18\/chh-hc-bail-cannot-be-granted-if-accusations-are-found-to-be-prima-facie-true-under-section-43d-of-the-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-1967\/","url_meta":{"origin":214581,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | Bail cannot be granted if accusations are found to be prima facie true under S. 43(D) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Gautam Chourdiya, JJ. upheld the NIA Court\u2019s order rejecting the appellant\u2019s prayer under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act,2008 for his bail under Section 439 of Criminal Procedural Code, 1973 (CrPC) after he had been charged under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/ker-hc-court-refers-to-communist-party-of-india-maoist-as-an-undisputed-banned-terrorist-organisation-under-first-schedule-to-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-bail-applicati\/","url_meta":{"origin":214581,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Court refers to Communist Party of India (Maoist) as an \u201cundisputed banned terrorist organisation under first schedule to Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act\u201d; bail application rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench of A. Hariprasad and N. Anil Kumar, JJ. dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants by invoking Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (\u201cNIA Act\u201d) as they were accused under Sections 20, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236090,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/22\/jhar-hc-if-case-discloses-prima-facie-culpability-then-bar-under-proviso-to-s-43d-5-of-uapa-will-be-attracted-bail-rejected-in-view-of-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":214581,"position":2},"title":"Jhar HC | If case discloses \u2018prima facie\u2019 culpability then bar under proviso to S. 43D (5) of UAPA will be attracted; Bail rejected in view of the same","author":"Editor","date":"September 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0 A Division Bench of H.C. Mishra and Rajesh Kumar, JJ., dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that secret information was received by the police regarding the extortion of levy by the banned terrorist organization Tritya Prastuti Committee, in the coal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/madras-high-court-granted-bail-non-bailable-offence-national-investigation-agency-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-1967-indian-penal-code-1860-prisoner-on-transit-warrant-non-bailable-warrant\/","url_meta":{"origin":214581,"position":3},"title":"Madras High Court| PT warrant can never be converted into regular warrant in a case where the accused person is already on bail; opportunity should be given to the accused to explain his non-appearance","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a case related to an appeal filed for the cancellation of an order of dismissing the bail application by the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial of Bomb Blast Cases) (Special Court), S.Vaidyanathan and A.D. Jagadish Chandira, JJ. released\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/","url_meta":{"origin":214581,"position":4},"title":"J&K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed an appeal against an order of the lower courts whereby appellant\u2019s bail application had been rejected. In the instant case, one of the accused had received some money from his cousins and handed over the same to the appellants so\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":349267,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/31\/attempt-to-disrupt-communal-harmony-and-reinstate-mughal-order-mp-high-court-denies-bail-under-uapa-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":214581,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Attempt to disrupt communal harmony and reinstate Mughal Order\u2019; MP High Court denies bail under UAPA","author":"Ritu","date":"May 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is for the trial Court to decide it on the basis of the evidence as to what is the material available to prove or otherwise the charges which have been framed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}