{"id":214458,"date":"2019-05-08T17:30:25","date_gmt":"2019-05-08T12:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214458"},"modified":"2019-05-13T12:54:07","modified_gmt":"2019-05-13T07:24:07","slug":"utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking changes in road alignment and to issue mandamus commanding and directing the respondent to construct the road as per the old survey, the petition further wanted an injunction against the respondent against peaceful possession of irrigated land of the villagers.<\/p>\n

The aggrieved petitioner claimed to be a farmer and a duly elected Gram Pradhan of the village. He contended that the roads earlier sanctioned, passed through the Village Panchayat Chamaswada, which would have benefited around 500 families and now the respondent State had shifted the route which now passes through a different village, thereby affected the interests of individuals (villagers). He further contended that Right under Article 300-A of the Constitution, has been violated as per the new layout plan. It drastically affected the interest of several private landholders and they will not get adequate compensation according to Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.<\/p>\n

The Court opinioned that, petitioner being a Gram Pradhan had a duty towards the people and in any case of grievance may put forward the case to State Government. In this particular case where the main issue was \u2018where road should be laid\u2019? or \u2018whether the alignment of road should be continued\u2019? is to be decided by Executive and it is out of the purview of Courts to adjudicate upon.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that, all such matters are of Executive realm and even under Article 226 of the Constitution; Courts don\u2019t have the power to take over the functions allocated to Executives and the State agencies. Answering to the issue aforementioned related to violation of private rights of individuals, the Court held, \u201cNeedless to state that it is always open to the land-owners, who are aggrieved by the action of the Government in laying a road over their lands, to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. Leaving it open to those land-owners, who may be aggrieved by the exercise undertaken by the respondents of laying a road without acquisition of their lands, to avail their judicial remedies.\u201d <\/em>Hence, the writ was dismissed as the petitioner had no locus standi in the relevant issue raised.[Bharat Singh v. State of Uttrakhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 348<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 2-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking changes in road alignment <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35284,2943,35285,14781,34721,35286],"class_list":["post-214458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-300-a-of-the-constitution","tag-injunction","tag-irrigated-land","tag-locus-standi","tag-peaceful-possession","tag-right-to-fair-compensation"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking changes in road alignment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-08T12:00:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-13T07:24:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-08T12:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-13T07:24:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking changes in road alignment","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-08T12:00:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-13T07:24:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/","name":"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-08T12:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-13T07:24:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/utt-hc-questions-regarding-laying-of-a-road-or-alignment-thereof-are-matters-in-the-executive-realm-and-not-for-court-to-decide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Questions regarding laying of a road or alignment thereof, are matters in the Executive realm and not for Court to decide"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/14\/court-not-to-interfere-in-writ-jurisdiction-where-civil-proceedings-are-pending-for-the-same-subject-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":214458,"position":0},"title":"Court not to interfere in writ jurisdiction where civil proceedings are pending for the same subject matter","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. wherein extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court was invoked. Petitioner had invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of the High Court in order to seek issuance of directions to respondent not to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271780,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/17\/if-removal-of-husband-from-home-is-the-only-way-to-ensure-domestic-peace-the-courts-need-to-pass-such-orders-madras-high-court-directs-husband-to-leave-the-house\/","url_meta":{"origin":214458,"position":1},"title":"If removal of husband from home is the only way to ensure domestic peace, the Courts need to pass such orders; Madras High Court directs husband to leave the house","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In a case of marital discord and petitioner-wife, a practicing advocate was seeking removal of respondent-husband from the matrimonial home, R N Manjula, J. granted protection order and directed the husband to move out of the matrimonial home in the best interest and welfare of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/08\/grant-of-injunction\/","url_meta":{"origin":214458,"position":2},"title":"Megh HC | Grant of injunction cannot be claimed by a party as a matter of right nor can it be denied by the Court arbitrarily; Court dismisses petition on the question of effective possession","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H. S. Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court by way of this application under Order 6 of Meghalaya (Jurisdiction over District Council Courts) Order, 2014. The appellant claimed that he was running a hostel in a building\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":214458,"position":3},"title":"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Amit Rawal J., dismissed the second appeal petition on the ground that there was no substantial question for determination. The regular second appeal was preferred at the instance of the appellant\/defendant against the decretal suit against the injunction order to her to not to interfere\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/road-being-used-since-decades-cannot-be-denied-access-to-even-if-there-is-alternate-route-available-gujarat-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214458,"position":4},"title":"Road being used since decades cannot be denied access to even if there is alternate route available: Gujarat HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.J. Desai, J. denied a writ petition under Articles 14, 16, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India on being devoid of merits. The respondent herein has filed a suit under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar Courts Act requesting the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/son-in-law-and-his-right-on-father-in-laws-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":214458,"position":5},"title":"Son-in-law and his right on Father-in-laws property | Claim that he was adopted as a member of family subsequent to marriage with daughter: Know what Ker HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: N. Anil Kumar, J., decided a matter wherein the son-in-law claimed his right on father-in-law\u2019s property while pleading that he was adopted by his wife\u2019s family after marriage and hence had a right on the property. Plaintiff aged 69 years was the respondent in the appeal claiming\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}