{"id":214434,"date":"2019-05-08T13:30:36","date_gmt":"2019-05-08T08:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214434"},"modified":"2019-05-09T14:27:32","modified_gmt":"2019-05-09T08:57:32","slug":"pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. was hearing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 which sought quashing of Family Court\u2019s order whereby applicant-husband was directed to pay maintenance to his wife (2nd<\/sup> respondent herein).<\/p>\n

At the outset, this Court called for a report from the Family Court, in the present matter. The said report stated that the applicant, till date had not complied with Family Court\u2019s order to pay maintenance. At this juncture, learned counsel for the applicant Mr Dineshwar Prasad Singh submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the application.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that the applicant could not be allowed to simply withdraw the application, when his mala fide conduct stood exposed. It was observed that strict order was required to ensure payment of maintenance to the 2nd<\/sup> respondent, moreso, when there was a judicial order to that effect. The Court, under its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is also required to pass an order for securing the ends of justice.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the application was disposed of as withdrawn, directing the Family Court to take all coercive measures against the applicant for ensuring compliance of its order directing payment of maintenance.[Sanjay Yadav v. State of Bihar, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 601<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 03-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. was hearing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35276,2864,33494,2549,33117],"class_list":["post-214434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-coercive-measures","tag-family_court","tag-judicial-order","tag-maintenance","tag-section-482-of-the-code-of-criminal-procedure"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. was hearing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-08T08:00:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-09T08:57:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-08T08:00:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-09T08:57:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct","og_description":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. was hearing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-08T08:00:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-09T08:57:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/","name":"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-08T08:00:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-09T08:57:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/pat-hc-withdrawal-simpliciter-of-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-allowed-when-applicant-indulges-in-malafide-conduct\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Withdrawal simpliciter of application under S. 482 CrPC not allowed, when applicant indulges in malafide conduct"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":322644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/21\/when-can-order-under-section-125-crpc-be-modified-or-recalled-allahabad-high-court-clarifies\/","url_meta":{"origin":214434,"position":0},"title":"When can an order under Section 125 CrPC be modified or recalled? Allahabad High Court clarifies","author":"Editor","date":"May 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is clear that Section-125 CrPC is social justice legislation which orders for the maintenance of wives, children and parents and the legislature has provided in Sections-125(5) CrPC., 126 CrPC as well as Section-127 CrPC, certain conditions on fulfilling of which, order passed u\/s 125 CrPC can be recalled or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/14\/maintenance-cannot-be-denied-solely-because-wife-is-leading-modern-lifestyle-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":214434,"position":1},"title":"Maintenance cannot be denied solely because wife is leading modern lifestyle: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court deliberated on whether morality could supersede legal provisions and questioned if leading a modern lifestyle could be deemed immoral.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/woman-living-with-man-for-considerably-long-period-of-time-as-husband-and-wife-is-entitled-to-maintenance-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":214434,"position":2},"title":"Woman living with man for considerably long period of time entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that Supreme Court has emphasised on the broad interpretation of the term \u201cwife\u201d under Section 125 of CrPC and the presumption of marriage in cases of long cohabitation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-s-300-crpc-not-applicable-to-dv-act-maintenance-arrears-fully-recoverable\/","url_meta":{"origin":214434,"position":3},"title":"S. 300 CrPC inapplicable to DV Act proceedings; maintenance arrears recoverable despite civil imprisonment: Allahabad High Court","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"April 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Invoking Section 300 CrPC to deny execution of maintenance under the DV Act is contrary to law and reflects non-application of mind.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"maintenance arrears recoverable despite imprisonment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259990,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/false-promise-to-marry\/","url_meta":{"origin":214434,"position":4},"title":"False promise of marriage to satisfy lust, leading to offence of cheating and rape?: Bom HC refuses to quash FIR for offences under Ss. 376, 417 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of A.S. Chandurkar and G.A. Sanap, JJ.,\u00a0 refused to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC for quashing an FIR in offences of cheating and rape in the matter wherein the applicant\/accused committed sexual intercourse with the girl against her will in the pretext of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/26\/all-hc-while-exercising-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-can-high-court-make-any-comment-on-factual-matrix-of-the-case-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":214434,"position":5},"title":"All HC | While exercising inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC, can High Court make any comment on factual matrix of the case? Court answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0Ram Krishna Gautam, J., held that as per Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, while exercising the inherent jurisdiction, High Court cannot make any comment on the factual matrix as the same remains under the trial court's domain. The instant application was filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}