{"id":214424,"date":"2019-05-08T10:30:02","date_gmt":"2019-05-08T05:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214424"},"modified":"2019-05-08T17:17:30","modified_gmt":"2019-05-08T11:47:30","slug":"tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tripura High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the Judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for an offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant was alleged to have committed the murder of his wife. The trial court had observed that the appellant was found on the previous day of the incident as well as on a fateful evening in his rented house by the witnesses, and he alone committed his wife&#8217;s murder and none else. The plea\u00a0of alibi taken as defence by the appellant was not accepted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Explaining the law regarding the plea of alibi and burden of proof thereof, the High Court stated:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0 &#8220;Latin word &#8216;alibi&#8217; means &#8216;elsewhere&#8217; and that word is used for convenience when an accused takes recourse to a defence line that when the occurrence took place he was so far away from the place of occurrence that it is extremely improbable that he would have participated\u00a0in the crime. It is basic\u00a0law that in a criminal case, in which the accused is alleged to have inflicted physical injury to another person, the burden is on the prosecution to prove that the accused was present at the scene and has participated in the crime. The burden would not be lessened by the mere fact that the accused has adopted the defence of alibi. The plea\u00a0of the accused in such cases need be considered only when the burden has been discharged by the prosecution satisfactorily.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Explaining further:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0 &#8220;When the presence of the accused at the scene of occurrence is established satisfactorily by the prosecution through reliable evidence, normally the court would be slow to believe any counter-narrative to the effect that he was elsewhere when the occurrence happened. But if the evidence adduced by the accused is of such a quality and of such a standard that the court may entertain some reasonable doubt regarding his presence at the scene when the occurrence took place, the accused would, no doubt, be entitled to the benefit of reasonable doubt. For that purpose, it would be a sound proposition that in such circumstances, the burden on the accused is rather heavy. It follows, therefore, that strict proof is required for establishing the plea of alibi.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the prosecution had failed to prove appellant&#8217;s presence at the scene of the crime. Thus, there was no occasion to consider whether his plea of alibi could be considered or not. Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside and the appellant was set at liberty on the benefit of doubt. [Suman Nama v. State of Tripura, Crl. A. (J) No. 33 of 2015, decided on 03-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the Judgment of the trial court <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26894,2948,35272,35273,30765],"class_list":["post-214424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-benefit-of-doubt","tag-murder","tag-plea-of-alibi","tag-scene-of-crime","tag-section-302-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the Judgment of the trial court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-08T05:00:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-08T11:47:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-08T05:00:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-08T11:47:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained","og_description":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the Judgment of the trial court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-08T05:00:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-08T11:47:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/","name":"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-08T05:00:02+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-08T11:47:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/tripura-hc-strict-proof-required-to-prove-plea-of-alibi-law-regarding-burden-of-proof-explained\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Strict proof required to prove plea of alibi; law regarding burden of proof explained"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/bom-hc-acid-attack-case-attackers-conviction-upheld-but-death-penalty-commuted-holding-him-to-be-of-young-age-and-not-beyond-reformation\/","url_meta":{"origin":214424,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Acid Attack Case: Attacker\u2019s conviction upheld but death penalty commuted holding him to be of young age and not beyond reformation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of B.P. Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. allowed an appeal by a convict who was convicted for murder and voluntary throwing acid by a trial court under Sections 302 and 326-B of Penal Code, 1860 (herein 'IPC'), and commuted his death sentence holding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":55461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/husband-and-father-in-law-held-guilty-of-murder-on-the-basis-of-circumstantial-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":214424,"position":1},"title":"Husband and Father-in-law held guilty for the murder of a young bride on the basis of circumstantial evidence","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While examining the circumstantial evidences in case of brutal murder of a young bride, the bench comprising of Prafulla C. Pant \u00a0and D. Y. Chandrachud JJ. held the appellants guilty for the murder along with the mother-in-law of the deceased, who had already been convicted for the offence.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337802,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/23\/supreme-court-upholds-murder-conviction-wife-death-rejects-alibi\/","url_meta":{"origin":214424,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court upholds conviction of man for murdering his wife; Rejects plea of alibi","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The absence of any explanation or defense from the convict, coupled with the surrounding circumstances that pointed to his culpability, led the Supreme Court to conclude that the only plausible inference was that the convict had participated in the commission of the crime.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Plea of alibi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Plea-of-alibi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Plea-of-alibi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Plea-of-alibi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Plea-of-alibi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/jk-hc-alibi-not-ground-to-quash-charge-sheet\/","url_meta":{"origin":214424,"position":3},"title":"Know why J&amp;K and Ladakh HC held that charge-sheet could not be quashed based on plea of alibi","author":"Editor","date":"July 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court in exercise of its powers under Section 528 of the BNSS cannot hold a mini trial to ascertain the veracity of the plea of alibi\u00a0put up by the petitioners.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"alibi not ground to quash charge sheet","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/alibi-not-ground-to-quash-charge-sheet.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/alibi-not-ground-to-quash-charge-sheet.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/alibi-not-ground-to-quash-charge-sheet.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/alibi-not-ground-to-quash-charge-sheet.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363535,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/plea-of-alibi-cannot-be-considered-at-charge-sheet-stage\/","url_meta":{"origin":214424,"position":4},"title":"Plea of alibi cannot be considered at stage of filing the charge-sheet: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFiling of charge-sheet is not an empty formality and it should contain all the details for not sending accused for trial, to enable the Magistrate to decide whether to accept the report and discharge the bonds or order further investigation or to take cognizance of the offence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"plea of alibi cannot be considered at charge sheet stage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/plea-of-alibi-cannot-be-considered-at-charge-sheet-stage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/plea-of-alibi-cannot-be-considered-at-charge-sheet-stage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/plea-of-alibi-cannot-be-considered-at-charge-sheet-stage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/plea-of-alibi-cannot-be-considered-at-charge-sheet-stage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/07\/raped-in-matrimonial-home-disbelieved-beaten-up-sc-believes-womans-sole-testimony-finds-act-of-female-members-of-the-family-unfortunate\/","url_meta":{"origin":214424,"position":5},"title":"Raped in matrimonial home; disbelieved; beaten up! SC believes woman&#8217;s sole testimony; finds act of female members of the family &#8220;unfortunate&#8221;","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Being women at least the sister-in-law and mother-in-law ought to have supported the prosecutrix, rather than beating her and not believing the prosecutrix.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214424\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}