{"id":214322,"date":"2019-05-04T15:24:11","date_gmt":"2019-05-04T09:54:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214322"},"modified":"2019-05-17T12:18:16","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T06:48:16","slug":"courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/","title":{"rendered":"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: Stating that the essential qualifications for appointment to a post are for the employer to decide, the bench of Arun Mishra and Navin Sinha, JJ said,<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe court cannot lay down the conditions of eligibility, much less can it delve into the issue with regard to desirable qualifications being at par with the essential eligibility by an interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement. Questions of equivalence will also fall outside the domain of judicial review.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The Court further held that if the language of the advertisement and the rules are clear, the Court cannot sit in judgment over the same. If there is an ambiguity in the advertisement or it is contrary to any rules or law the matter has to go back to the appointing authority after appropriate orders, to proceed in accordance with law.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn no case can the Court, in the garb of judicial review, sit in the chair of the appointing authority to decide what is best for the employer and interpret the conditions of the advertisement contrary to the plain language of the same.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court was hearing the appeal filed against the order of the High Court holding that candidates possessing the requisite years of experience in research and development of drugs and testing of the same, are also eligible to be considered for appointment to the post of Assistant Commissioner (Drugs) and Drug Inspectors under separate advertisements dated 04.01.2012 and 31.03.2015.<\/p>\n

It was submitted before the Court that the academic qualifications coupled with the requisite years of practical experience in the manufacturing and testing of drugs were essential qualifications for appointment. Research experience in a research and development laboratory was a desirable qualification which may have entitled such a person to a preference only. The latter experience could not be equated with and considered to be at par with the essential eligibility to be considered for appointment. It was argued that the High Court erred in misreading the advertisement to redefine the desirable qualification as an essential qualification by itself.<\/p>\n

The Court said that the plain reading of the advertisement provides that a degree in Pharmacy or Pharmaceutical Chemistry or in medicine with specialization in Clinical Pharmacology or Microbiology from a University coupled with the requisite years of experience thereafter in manufacturing or testing of drugs were essential qualifications. Preference could be given to those possessing the additional desirable qualification of research experience in the synthesis and testing of drugs in a research laboratory.<\/p>\n

The Court also said that<\/p>\n

\n

\u201can expert committee may have been constituted and which examined the documents before calling the candidates for interview cannot operate as an estoppel against the clear terms of the advertisement to render an ineligible candidate eligible for appointment.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

[Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 652<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03.05.2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: Stating that the essential qualifications for appointment to a post are for the employer to decide, the bench of Arun <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2888,6111,15821,30651,31857,30215,5941],"class_list":["post-214322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-advertisement","tag-appointment","tag-eligibility","tag-employee","tag-employer","tag-judicial-interference","tag-service-law"],"yoast_head":"\nCourts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Stating that the essential qualifications for appointment to a post are for the employer to decide, the bench of Arun\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-04T09:54:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T06:48:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/\",\"name\":\"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-04T09:54:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-17T06:48:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility","og_description":"Supreme Court: Stating that the essential qualifications for appointment to a post are for the employer to decide, the bench of Arun","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-04T09:54:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-17T06:48:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/","name":"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-04T09:54:11+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-17T06:48:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/courts-cant-do-interpretive-rewriting-of-the-advertisement-thereby-changing-the-conditions-of-eligibility\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Courts can\u2019t do interpretive re\u00adwriting of the advertisement thereby changing the conditions of eligibility"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238474,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/candidate-suppresses-his-over-qualification-during-recruitment-process-can-he-later-contend-that-over-qualification-cant-be-a-disqualification-heres-what-sc-says\/","url_meta":{"origin":214322,"position":0},"title":"Candidate suppresses his over-qualification during recruitment process. Can he later contend that over-qualification can’t be a disqualification? Here’s what SC says","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Employers prescribe qualifications to any post, not Courts.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265559,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/18\/history-subject-educational-qualification-post-graduate-teacher-training-jharkhand-expert-opinion-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214322,"position":1},"title":"Appointment of Teachers| Can obtaining a degree in one branch of a subject be considered equivalent to obtaining degree in the subject as a whole? SC answers\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Court was posed with the question as to whether the degrees obtained by the respective petitioners in one branch of History can be said to be obtaining a degree in History, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268203,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/10\/bom-hc-vacancies-in-open-category-posts-also-need-to-be-advertised-under-maharashtra-employees-of-private-schools-conditions-of-service-regulation-act-1977\/","url_meta":{"origin":214322,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC| Vacancies in open category posts also need to be advertised under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977","author":"Editor","date":"June 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The petitioners challenged the order of a School Tribunal, whereby they were directed to reinstate the respondent\/employee. Quashing the order of the Tribunal, the Bench of Rohit B. Deo, J. clarified that the advertisement of posts is not limited to posts that are reserved. It is necessary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/215242\/","url_meta":{"origin":214322,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 May 2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES Sexual Harassment allegations against CJI: SC In-House committee gives clean chit to CJI The In-House committee, headed by Justice SA Bobde, also comprising Justices Indira Banerjee and Indu Malhotra, found \u201cno substance\u201d in the sexual harassment allegations levelled by a former Supreme Court employee against the CJI Ranjan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307257,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/16\/junior-office-assistant-recruitment-state-not-relax-essential-qualifications-rules-advertisement-publicizing-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":214322,"position":4},"title":"Junior Office Assistant Recruitment | State could not relax essential qualifications under Rules and Advertisement without publicizing such relaxation: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"November 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court rejected the argument that requirement to hold 1 year diploma in specified courses was not an essential qualification, since the same was indicated in 2014 Rules as well as the advertisement so concerned.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Junior Office Assistant Recruitment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Junior-Office-Assistant-Recruitment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Junior-Office-Assistant-Recruitment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Junior-Office-Assistant-Recruitment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Junior-Office-Assistant-Recruitment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246342,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/01\/recruitment\/","url_meta":{"origin":214322,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | Whether higher qualification presupposes lower qualification always for the purposes of recruitment? HC discusses","author":"Editor","date":"April 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P. R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu, JJ. sets aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal. Background The facts of the case are such that a combined notification (Geology and Mining Department and Panchayat & Rural Development Department and Public Works\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214322"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214322\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}