{"id":214320,"date":"2019-05-04T16:30:11","date_gmt":"2019-05-04T11:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214320"},"modified":"2019-05-10T12:25:58","modified_gmt":"2019-05-10T06:55:58","slug":"tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","title":{"rendered":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):<\/strong> This matter was brought before Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case were such that an Interconnect Agreement was entered between the parties. This dispute occurred due to the bill raised by respondent alleging petitioner that it had tampered CLI (Calling Line Identification) number of international calls as domestic calls wrongly routing the same through Local PoI (point of interconnection) rather than designated PoI which was a violation of terms and conditions of the Interconnect agreement mentioned under Clause 6.4.6. This clause was added later with retrospective effect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The issues thus raised was whether there was wrongful routing or masking of the calls attracting Clause 6.4.6 and whether number 281-3041000 was an unallocated number with petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Call Detail Record (CDRs) submitted as evidence showed the aforementioned number to be unallocated number or a number not in use. Mr Saket Singh counsel on behalf of petitioner submitted that evidence should not be accepted as no conclusion can be drawn from such CDRs due to calls being of less than a minute and a half. This argument was rejected thereby concluding the number in question to be an unallocated number. Whereas Mr Tejvir Singh Bhatia, counsel on behalf of respondent submitted that according to the circular of DoT where CLI could not be tampered, a certain degree of diligence was required from service Provider i.e. petitioner, which was not done. It was brought before Tribunal that petitioner had filed FIR against the purported subscriber but this was contested by respondent stating that the above action of petitioner does not absolve petitioner if wrong routing of case was detected. Respondent further stated that the CLI was tampered as the number though unallocated was found to exist in the petitioner\u2019s network suggesting unauthorised diversion of routing of ILD (International Long Distance Calls) which could have only been done by the service provider.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tribunal relied on the observation made by the Supreme Court in this matter, that under the Interconnect Agreement, the Unified Access Service License (UASL) holder i.e. petitioner was obliged to maintain the integrity of its exchange\/PoI. Since, the petitioner failed to maintain the same, in lights of the evidence, its observation and analysis that the respondent is right in attributing wrong routing by petitioner attracting Clause 6.4.6 of the Agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the question whether this clause was applicable, Tribunal stated that clause of circular had limited application and thus Clause 6.4.6 of the Agreement should not be held to be substituted by clause of circular. Thus, Clause 6.4.6 was applicable in case of wrong routing of calls with retrospective effect. Therefore, this petition was dismissed as the issues were answered against the petitioner. [Reliance Communication Ltd. v. BSNL,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ru33mH9y\"> <b>2019 SCC OnLine TDSAT 64<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 25-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): This matter was brought before Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member). Facts of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":31441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[35223,35220,35218,35221,35219,35222],"class_list":["post-214320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-call-detail-record","tag-calling-line-identification","tag-interconnect-agreement","tag-international-long-distance-calls","tag-unallocated-number","tag-unified-access-service-license"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): This matter was brought before Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member). Facts of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-04T11:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-10T06:55:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/\",\"name\":\"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-04T11:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-10T06:55:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls","og_description":"Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): This matter was brought before Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member). Facts of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-04T11:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-10T06:55:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","name":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-04T11:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-10T06:55:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/25\/tdsat-lcn-once-assigned-not-to-be-changed-before-1-year-zee-channels-to-be-restored-to-earlier-lcns\/","url_meta":{"origin":214320,"position":0},"title":"TDSAT | LCN once assigned, not to be changed before 1 year; Zee channels to be restored to earlier LCNs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): The Coram of Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member) heard two petitions together as they raise common issues of law and are based on identical facts. The petitioner, ZEE Entertainment Enterprise Ltd. had alleged that the respondents have removed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/17\/tdsat\/","url_meta":{"origin":214320,"position":1},"title":"TDSAT | A dispute between two service providers may be maintainable even in absence of a subsisting agreement; Totality of facts to be considered","author":"Editor","date":"March 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. Facts The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a Multi-System Operator i.e. MSO and Respondent 1 is a Local Cable Operator i.e. LCO in Andhra Pradesh within the area\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":153994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","url_meta":{"origin":214320,"position":2},"title":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences","author":"Saba","date":"September 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):\u00a0The petitioner, Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. is a public limited company and a cable television service provider duly registered as MSO\/cable operator had entered into an agreement with the respondent, Odisha Television Ltd., a broadcaster engaged in the business of distribution of television\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":31431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/02\/petition-filed-by-asianet-satellite-communication-ltd-seeking-recovery-of-rs-1-30-crores-towards-balance-of-carriage-fees-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":214320,"position":3},"title":"Petition filed by Asianet Satellite Communication Ltd. seeking recovery of Rs. 1.30 crores towards balance of carriage fees, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) :\u00a0TDSAT has dismissed a petition filed by Asianet Satellite Communication Ltd. seeking payment from a local cable operator Sathyadhara Communications Pvt. Ltd. for the period for which the signals were sent even after expiry of a valid interconnect agreement. The recovery petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/21\/tdsat-trai-cannot-frame-regulations-with-retrospective-effect-in-the-absence-of-any-provision-to-that-effect-in-trai-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":214320,"position":4},"title":"TDSAT | TRAI cannot frame Regulations with retrospective effect in the absence of any provision to that effect in TRAI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, (Chairperson) while not granting any interim relief to the petitioners upholds that the amendment Regulations 2018 cannot have retrospective operation. The two respondents, Tata Communications Ltd. and Bharati Airtel Ltd., are owners of facilities called Cable Landing Operations. For\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/trai-releases-telecommunication-broadcasting-and-cable-services-register-of-interconnection-agreements-and-all-such-other-matters-regulations-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":214320,"position":5},"title":"TRAI releases &#8212; Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Register of Interconnection Agreements and all such other matters Regulations, 2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) issued the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Register of Interconnection Agreements and all such other matters Regulations, 2019. 2. The primary objective of the register of Interconnect regulations is to formulate the contours of a reporting system for the service providers so that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/TRAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/TRAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/TRAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/TRAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/TRAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214320"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214320\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}