{"id":214218,"date":"2019-05-02T09:51:28","date_gmt":"2019-05-02T04:21:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214218"},"modified":"2019-05-07T15:25:29","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T09:55:29","slug":"chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has held that a Government servant is not entitled to make a Will of the family pension which is granted in accordance with the service rules.<\/p>\n

Vijay Kumar Kaushik, Head Constable in the Police Department, died in harness. He had two wives and children from each of them. After his death, the first wife and her children (petitioners) made an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession\u00a0Act, 1925 for grant of Succession Certificate claiming family pension, gratuity, and other benefits. This was opposed by the second wife and her children (respondents) contending that Vijay Kumar had already made a Will in their favour and also nominated them in service records, and therefore the petitioners were not entitled for grant of succession certificate. Petitioner’s application was rejected by the trial court, which decision had been affirmed by the appellate court. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed the present revision petition under Section 388(3) of the 1925 Act.<\/p>\n

Shivali Dubey, Advocate appeared for the petitioners; Devesh Chandra Verma, Advocate represented the respondents (second wife and her children); and Hari Agrawal, Advocate appeared as amicus curiae,\u00a0<\/em>whose assistance was appreciated by the Court.<\/p>\n

Applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in\u00a0Jodh Singh v. Union of India, <\/em>(1980) 4 SCC 306<\/a>; Violet<\/em>\u00a0Isaac v. Union of India,\u00a0<\/em>(1991) 1 SCC 725<\/a>; and\u00a0Nitu Singh v. Sheela Rani, <\/em>(2016) 16 SCC 229<\/a>, the High Court recapitulated the\u00a0guiding principles of law relating to retiral benefits\u00a0vis-a-vis\u00a0<\/em>their testamentary disposition:<\/strong><\/p>\n

(i) An employee has no power of testamentary disposition with respect to something which was not payable to him during his lifetime.<\/p>\n

(ii) If the qualifying event\/benefit occurs only on the death of the deceased\u00a0while he is in service and due to this, some monetary benefits accrue, it would not form part of the estate of the deceased and the same cannot be disposed by testamentary disposition because there is an element of uncertainty\u00a0of happening of event.<\/p>\n

(iii) If the scheme and\/or service rules designate certain persons who are entitled to receive benefits out of the scheme, then no other person except those designated persons can be entitled to the said benefits.<\/p>\n

(iv) If the employee makes no contribution to the benefit, he has no control over the same to dispose it by testamentary disposition.<\/p>\n

(v) If the scheme\/Rules do not provide for the nomination of any person during the lifetime of the deceased employee, he has no title to the same and it cannot be disposed by testamentary disposition.<\/p>\n

However, it was made clear that the said principles are\u00a0not exhaustive\u00a0<\/em>and the condition laid above are independent of each other and\u00a0not mutually destructive\u00a0<\/em>and in the event of any of the conditions being fulfilled, it cannot be said that testamentary disposition can be made with respect to the said benefit.<\/p>\n

In light of the principles, the Court decided the present revision petition under different heads. The disbursement of the family pension, gratuity and other retirement benefits in the present case were governed by Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. As far as family pension was concerned, it was held that same was payable only to the family of a deceased employee, and Petitioner 1 being the legally wedded wife of Vijay Kumar, she was entitled to the entire amount of the said pension. Similarly, ex-gratia amount and police welfare amount were payable only after the death of the employee. As such, they did not form part of the estate of the deceased and thus could not be disposed by way of testamentary disposition. However, the benefits under the heads of gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance scheme, family benefits fund and department provident funds formed part of the estate of the deceased employee and therefore could be disposed by in terms of the Will made by the deceased employee.<\/p>\n

Consequently, the petitioners were held entitled to the Succession Certificate with regard to family pension, ex-gratia and police welfare payment. The revision petition was disposed of in such terms. [Samunda Bai v. General Public, 2019 SCC OnLine Chh 29<\/b><\/a>, dated 15-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has held that a Government servant is not entitled to make a Will of the family <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2898,31557,6031,17331],"class_list":["post-214218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Family_Pension","tag-government-employee","tag-retiral-benefits","tag-will"],"yoast_head":"\nChh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has held that a Government servant is not entitled to make a Will of the family\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-02T04:21:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-07T09:55:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-02T04:21:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-07T09:55:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has held that a Government servant is not entitled to make a Will of the family","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-02T04:21:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-07T09:55:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/","name":"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-05-02T04:21:28+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-07T09:55:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":376445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/23\/del-hc-succession-certificate-for-pension-arrears\/","url_meta":{"origin":214218,"position":0},"title":"Succession certificate not mandatory for release of posthumous pension arrears where legal heirship is undisputed: Delhi HC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the absence of any rival or competing claims, and where the identity and entitlement of the legal heirs are clearly verified, the competent authority may release retiral benefits, pensionary dues, compensation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Succession Certificate for Pension Arrears","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Succession-Certificate-for-Pension-Arrears.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Succession-Certificate-for-Pension-Arrears.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Succession-Certificate-for-Pension-Arrears.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Succession-Certificate-for-Pension-Arrears.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214929,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/megh-hc-family-pension-is-admissible-to-post-retiral-spouses-and-children-born-adopted-legally-after-retirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":214218,"position":1},"title":"Megh HC | Family pension is admissible to post-retiral spouses and children born\/adopted legally after retirement\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J.\u00a0 directed respondents 1 and 2 to substitute the name of petitioner in place of the deceased wife and directed them to communicate the same with respondent 3 for issuance of authorization for payment of pension. The deceased husband of the petitioner worked as havaldar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/10\/high-court-emphasizes-on-role-of-welfare-state-directs-authorities-to-release-pension-and-death-cum-retiral-benefits-within-60-days-or-pay-interest-thereon-from-your-own-pockets\/","url_meta":{"origin":214218,"position":2},"title":"Patna High Court emphasizes on role of Welfare State; directs authorities to \u201crelease pension and death-cum-retiral benefits\u201d","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. while hearing a civil writ petition filed by a widow for payment of family pension and death cum post retiral benefits, came down heavily upon the State for the prolonged delay in making payment and emphasized on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/family-pension\/","url_meta":{"origin":214218,"position":3},"title":"CAT | Widow of a substitute servant cannot be denied rights of family pension and death-cum-retirement benefits accorded to temporary servants","author":"Editor","date":"March 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT): Pradeep Kumar, Member (A) addressed the instant application wherein the widow of one Narayan Dutt, who was engaged as casual labour on 18-12-1972 under the respondent-Railway, had sought for the grant of family pension. The deceased was drawing a basic pay of Rs 226\/- p.m. when\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216958,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/all-hc-government-employee-not-entitled-to-death-cum-retiral-gratuity-until-conclusion-of-departmental-proceedings-or-judicial-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":214218,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Govt. employee not entitled to death cum retiral gratuity until conclusion of departmental proceedings or judicial proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Full Bench of Pankaj Mithal, Suneet Kumar and Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, JJ. dismissed a batch of writ petitions seeking entitlement to receive death-cum-retirement gratuity while judicial proceedings were pending. The petitioners were government employees (Lekhpal\/Police Officials), who had retired on attaining the age of superannuation, and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":363642,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-notional-pension-after-regularisation-of-13years-daily-wage-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":214218,"position":5},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC grants notional pension to family after regularising deceased employee’s 13 years of daily-wage service","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe deceased employee had rendered continuous daily waged service for 13 years from 1985 till his regularization, which worked out to be 2 years regular service after giving weightage of 1-year regular service in lieu of 5 years of daily wages service, and had rendered 9 years of regular service,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"regularisation of 13-years daily-wage service","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/regularisation-of-13-years-daily-wage-service.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/regularisation-of-13-years-daily-wage-service.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/regularisation-of-13-years-daily-wage-service.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/regularisation-of-13-years-daily-wage-service.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214218"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214218\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}