{"id":214205,"date":"2019-05-01T16:49:34","date_gmt":"2019-05-01T11:19:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214205"},"modified":"2019-05-10T12:07:22","modified_gmt":"2019-05-10T06:37:22","slug":"tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/","title":{"rendered":"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised"},"content":{"rendered":"

Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), New Delhi:<\/strong> Petitioner prayed before Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson and A.K. Bhargava, Member to set aside or quash the circular\/letter in order to restrain the rates derived from circular in accordance with Tribunal\u2019s previous judgment. By interim relief sought by the petitioner, they had asked to put a stay on the circular and to stop the respondent from taking any coercive action against petitioner for recovery of amounts under the impugned circular\/letter.<\/p>\n

It was submitted by the petitioner that earlier when a similar circular was issued by respondent whereby the infrastructural charges rates were revised the Tribunal upheld the same but it was to apply prospectively i.e. from next financial year. Though the aforementioned judgment was challenged before the Supreme Court to no stay on the judgment and order was granted.<\/p>\n

Tribunal was of the view that earlier interim relief was passed in a routine manner without noting anything on merits and without looking at the law laid down in the judgment so earlier passed. In the judgment, so passed petitioners were only protected from imposition of rates from any date prior to the next financial year with a declaration that respondents can revise the rates of infrastructural facilities. Since that judgment was not stayed, no prima facie case to grant interim stay in the instant case arose. Tribunal found a balance of convenience not in favour of petitioner in respect to money claim as payment made under the impugned circular was subject to the result of the petition. Therefore, Tribunal rejected the prayer for interim relief. [Cellular Operators Assn. of India v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine TDSAT 63<\/b><\/a>, dated 05-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), New Delhi: Petitioner prayed before Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson and A.K. Bhargava, Member to set <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":31441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[35156,33473,35157,35155],"class_list":["post-214205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-infrastructural-charges","tag-interim-stay","tag-order-to-restrain","tag-previous-judgment"],"yoast_head":"\nTDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), New Delhi: Petitioner prayed before Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson and A.K. Bhargava, Member to set\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-01T11:19:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-10T06:37:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/\",\"name\":\"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-01T11:19:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-10T06:37:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised","og_description":"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), New Delhi: Petitioner prayed before Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson and A.K. Bhargava, Member to set","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-01T11:19:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-10T06:37:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/","name":"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-01T11:19:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-10T06:37:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/tdsat-previous-judgment-applicable-as-the-same-was-not-put-on-stay-by-the-court-rates-of-infrastructural-charges-can-be-revised\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TDSAT | Previous Judgment applicable as the same was not put on stay by the Court, rates of infrastructural charges can be revised"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214320,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","url_meta":{"origin":214205,"position":0},"title":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): This matter was brought before Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member). Facts of the case were such that an Interconnect Agreement was entered between the parties. This dispute occurred due to the bill raised by respondent alleging petitioner that it had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/21\/tdsat-trai-cannot-frame-regulations-with-retrospective-effect-in-the-absence-of-any-provision-to-that-effect-in-trai-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":214205,"position":1},"title":"TDSAT | TRAI cannot frame Regulations with retrospective effect in the absence of any provision to that effect in TRAI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, (Chairperson) while not granting any interim relief to the petitioners upholds that the amendment Regulations 2018 cannot have retrospective operation. The two respondents, Tata Communications Ltd. and Bharati Airtel Ltd., are owners of facilities called Cable Landing Operations. For\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/13\/tdsat-veecon-permitted-the-use-of-name-and-logo-of-tiranga-tv-without-the-colours-saffron-and-green\/","url_meta":{"origin":214205,"position":2},"title":"TDSAT | Veecon permitted the use of name and logo of \u201cTiranga TV\u201d without the colours Saffron and Green","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): The Coram of Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member) while considering the factors of deceptive similarity, allowed this petition. In the instant case, the petitioner, a broadcaster of \u201cNews & Current Affairs\u201d television channel was authorized to use the name and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/in-case-of-charging-a-fee-for-inspection-of-emf-exposure-the-charge-should-be-justified-by-reasonable-cost-flowing-from-the-concept-of-quid-pro-quo\/","url_meta":{"origin":214205,"position":3},"title":"In case of charging a fee for inspection of EMF exposure, the charge should be justified by reasonable cost flowing from the concept of quid pro quo","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): A Division Bench of Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson), J. and A.K. Bhargava (Member), allowed a telecommunication petition filed against the actions of the respondent authorities, whereby fee for testing the Electromagnetic Fields (Radiation) exposure at Base Transceiver Station (BTS) sites, by the TERM Cell\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288262,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/31\/high-court-cannot-expand-scope-of-individual-borrowers-under-rbi-circular-2014-power-vests-with-rbi-madras-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":214205,"position":4},"title":"Power to expand scope of ‘individual borrowers’ under RBI Circular, 2014 vests with RBI and not with High Court: Madras High Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that the circular dated 2-08-2019, cannot have any implication in respect of the sole proprietary concern of the petitioner i.e., \u201cM\/s. Murugan Idli Shop\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/24\/delhi-high-court-directs-delhi-government-to-reimburse-rs-16-lakhs-to-a-judicial-officer-as-reimbursement-for-treatment-of-covid-19\/","url_meta":{"origin":214205,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Delhi Government to reimburse Rs. 16 lakhs to a judicial officer as reimbursement for treatment of Covid-19","author":"Editor","date":"November 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a writ petition filed by an Additional District Judge for reimbursement of his treatment charges during Covid-19, the Single Judge Bench of Rekha Palli, J. directed the Government of NCT of Delhi to reimburse the remaining amount of Rs. 16,93,880 towards the cost of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214205\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}