{"id":214192,"date":"2019-05-01T14:30:02","date_gmt":"2019-05-01T09:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214192"},"modified":"2019-05-01T12:21:05","modified_gmt":"2019-05-01T06:51:05","slug":"sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/","title":{"rendered":"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court of Appeal for the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: <\/strong>The Bench of M.M.A. Gaffoor, J. dismissed an appeal against an order rejecting an intervention application in a suit for partition, holding that the same was statutorily barred and because the impugned order was merely an interlocutory order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant herein was a plaintiff in a partition suit filed in the District Court of Kurunegala and have given evidence before the learned District Judge in the trial. Since the respondent-defendant contested the suit only on the basis of appellant-plaintiffs evidence, the case concluded and a final decree was issued. Thereafter, appellant-plaintiff filed an application for intervention under Section 328 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1890 in order to file their objections to dispossession. After an inquiry, the learned District Judge dismissed the said petition of the appellant-plaintiff. Aggrieved thereby, the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent-defendant Mr Gayanga Wijethunga submitted that the instant appeal was not maintainable on the following grounds:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>There is no right of appeal as the impugned order was not a final order but only an interlocutory order.<\/li>\n<li>In any event, there is no right of appeal as Section 329 of the Code bars an appeal from an order made under Section 328 of Code.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">At the outset, the Court held that the impugned order was an interlocutory order in terms of Section 754(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. Reliance in this regard was placed on <em>Senanayake v. Jayantha<\/em>, SC Appeal No. 41\/15 and SC CHC 37\/08, where it was held that if an order finally disposes of the matter in dispute, it is a final order but if the nature of order is such that it allows the action to go on, then it is an interlocutory order. Further, it was opined that the effect of an order under Section 328 is subject to the same conditions of appeal. As such, denial of a right of appeal is embodied in Section 329 of the Code itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the appeal was dismissed.[Wannahaka Mudiyanselage Heen Amma v. Wijesingha Mudiyanselage Punchi Banda Wanaduragala, C.A. 445\/97 (F), decided on 05-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Court of Appeal for the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Bench of M.M.A. Gaffoor, J. dismissed an appeal against an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[31954,35152,35151,35153],"class_list":["post-214192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-interlocutory-order","tag-intervention-application","tag-section-328-of-the-civil-procedure-code","tag-suit-for-partition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Court of Appeal for the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Bench of M.M.A. Gaffoor, J. dismissed an appeal against an\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-01T09:00:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/\",\"name\":\"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-01T09:00:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order","og_description":"Court of Appeal for the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Bench of M.M.A. Gaffoor, J. dismissed an appeal against an","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-01T09:00:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/","name":"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-01T09:00:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/01\/sl-coa-order-finally-disposing-dispute-is-a-final-order-but-an-order-that-allows-action-to-go-on-is-an-interlocutory-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL CoA | Order finally disposing dispute is a final order, but an order that allows action to go on is an interlocutory order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215080,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/sl-coa-restitutio-integrum-can-only-be-filed-by-a-party-to-the-action-and-the-person-must-act-in-utmost-promptness-while-seeking-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":214192,"position":0},"title":"SL CoA | Restitutio integrum can only be filed by a party to the action and the person must act in utmost promptness while seeking it","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. dismissed the petition application by the petitioner. In the present case, the petitioner filed an application seeking restoration of her rights to Lot 2 in the Preliminary Plan by way of amending the Judgment and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/cal-hc-upholds-mandatory-injunction-directs-demolition-in-violation-of-restraint-order-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":214192,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Court has power to grant mandatory injunctions at interlocutory stage\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs demolition in violation of injunction order","author":"Ritu","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court reiterated that the court, in exercising equitable jurisdiction, has the power to remedy wrongful acts, especially when there is a violation of a restraint order.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221338,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/21\/bom-hc-a-son-who-had-been-given-in-adoption-cannot-claim-partition-in-property-of-his-real-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":214192,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | A son, who had been given in adoption, cannot claim partition in property of his real father","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0M.G. Giratkar, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the judgments\u00a0of the lower courts wherein the partition suit brought by the appellant was dismissed. One Maghadeo, ho was the biological father of the appellant, had given the appellant in adoption to his real brother Fakira, who was childless.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/civil-court-jurisdiction-to-try-suit-for-title-possession-of-property-for-partition\/","url_meta":{"origin":214192,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court discusses Civil Court\u2019s jurisdiction to try suit once an application for partition is entertained by revenue authorities","author":"Editor","date":"January 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRegarding immovable properties (other than agricultural lands paying land revenue) - such as buildings, plots etc. or movable properties \u2014 where the Court can conveniently and without further enquiry make the division without the assistance of any Commissioner, or where parties agree upon the manner of division, the Court will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jurisdiction of Civil Court in parturition suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265928,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":214192,"position":4},"title":"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Mangesh S. Patil, J., decided on the following questions for consideration: Whether in a suit for partition and possession of the field all the sharers and co-partners are necessary parties? Whether suit for partition and possession is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties and therefore ought to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/18\/partition-may-also-be-effected-under-a-settlement-or-oral-understanding-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214192,"position":5},"title":"Partition of Property may also be effected under a settlement or an oral understanding: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no prohibition to effect a partition otherwise than through an instrument in writing by duly complying with the requirement of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"partition of property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214192\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}