{"id":214101,"date":"2019-04-30T20:00:30","date_gmt":"2019-04-30T14:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214101"},"modified":"2019-05-07T10:38:30","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T05:08:30","slug":"hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Surya Kant, C.J. and Sandeep Sharma, J. disposed of a petition with a direction to Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT-I) to supply a copy of the order so as to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT).<\/p>\n

In the present case the grievance of the petitioner was that the copy of the order dated 20-04-2019 by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh was not supplied to the petitioner where the same was appealable. But since the copy was not provided, therefore no appeal could be filed unless a copy of the order is supplied.<\/p>\n

The Court considering the situation of the petitioner sympathetically allowed the petitioner to move an application before DRT-I within a day or a two with a prayer to order status quo ante for a period of ten days so as to enable him to file an appeal before DRAT meanwhile.[Shivalik Fibres (P) Ltd. v. Punjab National Bank, 2019 SCC OnLine HP 543<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: The Bench of Surya Kant, C.J. and Sandeep Sharma, J. disposed of a petition with a direction to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,35111,33148],"class_list":["post-214101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-copy-of-order","tag-debts-recovery-appellate-tribunal"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The Bench of Surya Kant, C.J. and Sandeep Sharma, J. disposed of a petition with a direction to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-30T14:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-07T05:08:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-30T14:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-07T05:08:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The Bench of Surya Kant, C.J. and Sandeep Sharma, J. disposed of a petition with a direction to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-30T14:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-07T05:08:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/","name":"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-04-30T14:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-07T05:08:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/hp-hc-court-considers-plea-sympathetically-where-copy-of-the-order-was-not-supplied-to-petitioner-to-be-filed-in-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Court considers plea sympathetically where copy of the order was not supplied to petitioner to be filed in appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":203308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/writ-petition-filed-by-liquor-baron-vijay-mallya-dismissed-holding-requirement-of-pre-deposit-under-section-21-of-the-recovery-of-debts-due-to-banks-and-financial-institutions-act-1993-to-be-retrospe\/","url_meta":{"origin":214101,"position":0},"title":"Writ petition filed by liquor baron Vijay Mallya dismissed holding requirement of pre-deposit under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to be retrospective in operation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari and Krishna N. Dixit, JJ. dismissed a writ petition filed by fugitive industrialist Vijay Mallya, against order requiring pre-deposit of Rs. 3101 crores in order to maintain appeal against fixation of liability for debt due to banks. The factual background\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":306330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/03\/delhi-high-court-remedy-section-1310-sarfaesi-act-cannot-considered-remedy-independent-rdb-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214101,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court| Remedy under Section 13(10) of SARFAESI Act cannot be considered as a remedy independent of the RDB Act","author":"Arunima","date":"November 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court is unable to accept that the legislative intent is to provide parallel regimes for the recovery of debts. The provisions of Section 13(10) of the SARFAESI Act, thus, cannot be interpreted in the manner as contended on behalf of the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/recovery-proceedings-initiated-in-drt-ernakulam-and-appeal-filed-in-drat-chennai-primary-forum-drt-being-in-ernakulam-kerala-hc-has-supervisory-jurisdiction-over-drat-chennai\/","url_meta":{"origin":214101,"position":2},"title":"Recovery Proceedings| Primary forum (DRT) being in Ernakulam, Kerala HC has supervisory jurisdiction over DRAT, Chennai","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dama Seshadri Naidu, J. while hearing an original petition in a debt recovery matter ruled that where a Tribunal exercises its jurisdiction over more than one State, then the High Court in the State where the first court is located has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215005,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/mad-hc-costs-imposed-on-central-bank-of-india-for-deputing-chief-manager-who-did-not-file-proof-affidavit-to-be-cross-examined-in-proceedings-before-drt\/","url_meta":{"origin":214101,"position":3},"title":"Mad HC | Costs imposed on Central Bank of India for deputing Chief Manager, who did not file proof affidavit, to be cross-examined in proceedings before DRT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Rmt. Teeka Raman and P.D. Audikesavalu, JJ. imposed costs of Rs 25,000 on Central Bank of India for deputing its Chief Manager for cross-examination in the matter before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Chennai, in place of its Assistant General Manager who had filed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":278666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/validity-of-government-notification-changing-pecuniary-jurisdiction-of-drts-debt-recovery-legal-update-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":214101,"position":4},"title":"Divesting DRTs of their pecuniary jurisdiction without any amendment to RDB Act 1993 is unsustainable; Bombay HC stays notification changing DRT jurisdiction in matters above \u20b9100 crores","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: While hearing a challenge to the Government Notification dated 04\/10\/2022 changing the jurisdiction of Dept Recovery Tribunals in matters above \u20b9100 crores, the Division Bench of Sanjay A. Deshmukh and Ravindra V. Ghuge, JJ., held that divesting the Debts Recovery Tribunals of their pecuniary jurisdiction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/15\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-filed-by-drt-presiding-officer-m-m-dhonchak-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214101,"position":5},"title":"SC expresses displeasure over petition filed by DRT, Chandigarh Presiding Officer M.M. Dhonchak; dismisses petition challenging P&H High Court Order","author":"Editor","date":"May 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that it was unfortunate that Mr. Dhonchak had filed the petition against the order of Punjab and Haryana High Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"m.m. dhonchak","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/m.m.-dhonchak.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/m.m.-dhonchak.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/m.m.-dhonchak.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/m.m.-dhonchak.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214101\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}