{"id":214099,"date":"2019-04-30T12:30:16","date_gmt":"2019-04-30T07:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214099"},"modified":"2019-05-07T10:43:46","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T05:13:46","slug":"jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Aniruddha Bose, C.J. and B.B. Mangalmurti, J. dismissed a petition claiming arrears of pension, post retrial benefits with statutory and penal interest.<\/p>\n

In the present case the appellant was appointed as Chairman and later was appointed as Junior Account Clerk in Rural Works Department. After rendering a long length of service, he superannuated as Accounts Clerk. The respondents settled his pensionary benefits by paying his Government Provident Fund, Group Insurance amount, part of gratuity as per 5th Pay Revision Commission (old scale) and part of leave encashment as per 5th Pay Revision Commission (old scale). The appellant alleged that the respondent did not pay arrear and benefits of first, second and third financial upgradation under Assured Carrier Progression and the arrear of pay revision, gratuity and part of leave encashment as recommended by 6th Pay Revision Commission. And that he stands on equal footing with one of his colleague, Saryug Prasad, as when he approached the Court, the same was allowed and the respondent was directed to pay benefits of financial upgradation. The respondents controverted the claim as appellant did not pass a departmental examination which is mandatory and as such the case of this appellant is not similar to the case of Saryug Prasad. Moreover, after attaining the age of 50, the appellant did not approach his controlling officer for issuance of an order of waiver while he was in service.<\/p>\n

The Court after considering the material facts and the papers attached therewith held that it was clear that the appellant did not pass the mandatory test which was a prerequisite. The Court relied on the case of U.P. Jal Nigam v. Jaswant Singh<\/em>, (<\/strong>2006) 11 SCC 464<\/a> where the Court held that \u201c\u2026When a person who is not vigilant of his rights and acquiesces with this situation, can his writ petition be heard after a couple of years on the ground that same relief should be granted to him as was granted to persons similarly situated who was vigilant about his rights and challenged his retirement\u2026\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

In such view of the matter, the Court held that no relief could be granted to the appellant.[Birendra Kumar Sinha v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 432<\/b><\/a>, decided on 23-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Aniruddha Bose, C.J. and B.B. Mangalmurti, J. dismissed a petition claiming arrears of pension, post retrial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12441,35110,2769,6852,35109],"class_list":["post-214099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-pensionary-benefits","tag-post-retiral-benefits","tag-relief","tag-superannuation","tag-vigilant"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Aniruddha Bose, C.J. and B.B. Mangalmurti, J. dismissed a petition claiming arrears of pension, post retrial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-30T07:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-07T05:13:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-30T07:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-07T05:13:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Aniruddha Bose, C.J. and B.B. Mangalmurti, J. dismissed a petition claiming arrears of pension, post retrial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-30T07:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-07T05:13:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","name":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-30T07:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-07T05:13:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/","url_meta":{"origin":214099,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied","author":"Editor","date":"October 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Deepak Roshan J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the petition stating that the petitioner failed to show any error in the said judgment. The facts of the case is that the petitioner was appointed in 1971 as Extra Clerk in the office of District Sub- Registrar,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216152,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/pat-hc-prejudicial-action-taken-by-an-authority-against-a-government-servant-requires-conformance-to-art-14-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":214099,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | Prejudicial action taken by an authority against a government servant requires conformance to Art. 14 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Shivaji Pandey, J. granted relief in a civil writ petition, brought before the Bench by an employee who assailed the wrong fixation of pay and pension, without any notice, and alleged the same to be an arbitrary use of power on the part of the respondent. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/20\/universitys-functioning-cannot-be-at-the-cost-of-employees-welfare-bombay-hc-orders-sndt-womens-university-to-pay-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":214099,"position":2},"title":"University\u2019s functioning cannot be at the cost of employee’s welfare: Bombay HC orders SNDT Women’s University to pay pensionary benefits","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bombay High Court opined that a Public University is not expected to needlessly withhold the pensionary benefit of its retired employees.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283456,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/08\/pensionary-benefit-from-date-of-granting-part-time-tube-well-operators-pay-parity-with-regular-operators-cannot-be-granted-allahabad-high-court-reiterates-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":214099,"position":3},"title":"Pensionary benefit to \u201cpart time tube well operators\u201d cannot be granted from date of granting pay parity with regular operators; Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Article 14 of the Constitution of India has withstood the temperts of classification and discrimination, but the emerging disparity to regulate the condition of pension as a result of service ought not to obliterate the object of equality in a level playing field.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":325955,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/07\/ph-hc-directs-haryana-govt-to-refix-pension-pensionary-benefits-of-an-employee-who-was-reverted-after-his-retirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":214099,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC directs Haryana Govt. to refix pension and pensionary benefits of an employee who was reverted after his retirement","author":"Arushi","date":"July 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that it is a settled law that after an employee\u2019s retirement, the master and servant relationship ceases to operate. If any action is required to be taken after the retirement of an ex-employee, then same can always be taken when there is an express authority of law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":94931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":214099,"position":5},"title":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as ‘family member’ eligible for pensionary benefits","author":"Saba","date":"December 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary benefits to the petitioner, the Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and Nisha Banu, JJ. held that as per sub-rule 5 of Rule 45 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214099\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}