{"id":214006,"date":"2019-04-26T15:30:01","date_gmt":"2019-04-26T10:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=214006"},"modified":"2019-04-26T10:33:22","modified_gmt":"2019-04-26T05:03:22","slug":"sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division: <\/strong>This application was filed before G.J. Gajjar, AJ., under Rule 28(4) of the Uniform Rules of Courts by which the applicant seeks to amend its particulars of claim pursuant to a notice of objection filed by the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent had objected to the amendment in particulars on the ground that it was not possible to determine what work was undertaken to remedy the alleged defective work or what portion of invoices was reduced by a certain aggregate sum. The applicant and respondent had entered into an oral agreement under which respondent had provided a programmer who was not appropriate for managing the PLC program due to which applicant had to recheck and get it corrected by a third party and company E for necessary and related costs. Applicant in its proposed amended particulars of claim has attached seven invoices made out to company E. The amended particulars was thus reducing this amount by 50% as a discount by the third party. Thus, this reduced amount as an amendment to the particulars was criticized by respondents. Respondent submitted that the plaintiff, at the very least, is required to specifically stipulate what portion of the attached invoices was not for its account and that Rule 18(4) should be read conjunctively with the provisions of Rule 18(10) in regard to the particulars required when claiming damages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court was of the view that proposed amended particulars of claim do not disable the defendant from assessing the quantum of the claim. Therefore, the objection made by the respondent was dismissed and the particulars of claim was amended. [Shones Automation (PTY) Ltd. v. Smokey Mountain Trading 444 (PTY) Ltd., Case No. 1554 of 2018, decided on 19-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division: This application was filed before G.J. Gajjar, AJ., under Rule 28(4) of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":196407,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[35073,2590,19631,28924,33186],"class_list":["post-214006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-amend-particulars","tag-Claim","tag-objection","tag-quantum","tag-remedy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division: This application was filed before G.J. Gajjar, AJ., under Rule 28(4) of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-26T10:00:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-26T10:00:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":303,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Amend Particulars\",\"Claim\",\"objection\",\"quantum\",\"Remedy\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Foreign Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/\",\"name\":\"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-26T10:00:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/26\\\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed","og_description":"High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division: This application was filed before G.J. Gajjar, AJ., under Rule 28(4) of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-26T10:00:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed","datePublished":"2019-04-26T10:00:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/"},"wordCount":303,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg","keywords":["Amend Particulars","Claim","objection","quantum","Remedy"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Foreign Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/","name":"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg","datePublished":"2019-04-26T10:00:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/sa-hc-assessing-the-quantum-of-the-claim-not-disabled-by-the-amendment-of-particulars-objection-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/sa-hc-granting-amendment-to-particulars-of-claim-against-the-compensation-law-which-prohibits-any-action-by-employee-for-recovery-of-damages-not-justified\/","url_meta":{"origin":214006,"position":0},"title":"SA HC | Granting amendment to particulars of claim against the Compensation Law which prohibits any action by employee for recovery of damages not justified","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"South Africa High Court, Eastern Cape Local Division, Port Elizabeth: S.M. Mbenenge, JP, granted leave to appeal under Section 17(2)(a) of the Superior Courts Act (10 of 2013) as the judge (Mageza AJ) was no longer readily available. Mark Prince, the respondent in the present case worked as a machine\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220829,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/14\/sa-hc-nelson-mandela-bay-municipality-not-obligated-to-resolve-applicants-written-objection-as-latter-failed-to-demonstrate-it-as-right\/","url_meta":{"origin":214006,"position":1},"title":"SA HC | Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality not obligated to resolve applicant\u2019s written objection as latter failed to demonstrate it as right","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"South Africa High Court, Eastern Cape Local Division, Port Elizabeth: G.H. Bloem, J. while dismissing the application suggested an alternative remedy to the applicant whereas an application for order could have been instituted to either review or set aside the respondent\u2019s decision to declare or find its bid unsuccessful. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/HC-of-South-Africa-Eastern-Cape-Division.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/dismissal-of-election-petition-refused-as-section-831a-of-representation-of-people-act-1951-complied-with\/","url_meta":{"origin":214006,"position":2},"title":"Dismissal of election petition\u00a0 refused as Section 83(1)(a) of Representation of People Act, 1951 complied with","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of KH. Nobin Singh, J., dismissed an application filed for dismissal of Election Petition on the ground that it violates Section 100 of Representation of People Act, 1951 where grounds for declaration of election as void are given. The applicant filed this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/26\/calcutta-high-court-conduct-of-parties-not-a-substitute-for-an-arbitration-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":214006,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Conduct of Parties &#8211; not a substitute for an arbitration agreement","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court: While deciding a review petition, Debangsu Basak, J. held that the court while exercising powers under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot substitute arbitration agreement with conduct of parties. Facts of the Case The respondent filed an application under Section 11\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252467,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":214006,"position":4},"title":"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains  \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order allowing the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint. Counsel for the petition, Mr Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Mr Souri Ghosal and Mr\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":261859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/17\/a-dispute-cannot-be-referred-for-arbitration-on-account-of-fraud\/","url_meta":{"origin":214006,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC rejects argument that a dispute cannot be referred for arbitration on account of fraud: Read why","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: B.P. Colabawalla, J., addressed an arbitration application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Instant application was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214006\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/196407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}