{"id":213909,"date":"2019-04-24T10:30:18","date_gmt":"2019-04-24T05:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213909"},"modified":"2019-04-25T17:34:43","modified_gmt":"2019-04-25T12:04:43","slug":"jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: <\/b>The Bench of Rashid Ali Dar and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ., dismissed the<b> <\/b>Letters Patent Appeal which was preferred against the judgment and order whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioners-respondents had been allowed with the direction to the respondents to fix their pay scale against the post of Sanitary Supervisor with effect from the date when they were holding the post and to grant them all consequential benefits including arrears.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case were that the petitioners were appointed as Sanitary Supervisors and were subsequently regularized in the year 2000 and 2005 in the scale of Rs 2550-3200.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>The petitioners filed a writ petition claiming the pay scale of Rs 3050-4910 which was admissible against the post of Sanitary Supervisors from the date their services were regularized. The Respondent contended that the petitioners were backdoor appointees having been appointed by an officer who was having no jurisdiction to appoint them as such, plus the petitioners did not have the requisite qualification to hold the post of Sanitary Supervisors as per the relevant recruitment rules. The stand taken by the appellants before the writ Court was rejected by virtue of the judgment and order, hence the present Letters Patent Appeal was filed.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that on the date when the petitioners came to be regularized, there were no recruitment rules which prescribed the technical qualification which were then sought to be enforced for the post of Sanitary Supervisor. The Court stated that the petitioners, thus, could not have been denied the benefit of the pay scale of Rs 3050-4910. The allegations that the petitioners were appointed by an incompetent authority and that the engagement was <em>de hors<\/em> the rules was not a reason sufficient to deny them the pay scale. The appeal was found to be without merit and thus was dismissed. [State of J&amp;K v. Nazir Ahmad Magrey, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CnLaTjPG\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 362<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 16-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Rashid Ali Dar and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ., dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal which <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Rashid Ali Dar and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ., dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal which\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-24T05:00:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-25T12:04:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-24T05:00:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-25T12:04:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Rashid Ali Dar and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ., dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal which","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-24T05:00:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-25T12:04:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/","name":"J&K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-24T05:00:18+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-25T12:04:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/jk-hc-allegations-that-petitioners-were-appointed-by-incompetent-authority-and-that-the-engagement-was-de-hors-the-rules-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-deny-them-the-pay-scale\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | Allegations that petitioners were appointed by incompetent authority and that the engagement was de hors the rules is not a reason sufficient to deny them pay scale"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":278726,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/29\/allahabad-high-court-petitioners-assailing-validity-impugned-order-rejected-representation-grant-minimum-pay-scale-single-bench-alok-mathur-petitioners-entitled-minimum-pay-scale-granted-regular-emplo\/","url_meta":{"origin":213909,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court| Class IV Contractual Employees entitled to be paid same wages in accordance with the provisions of \u2018equal pay for equal work\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"November 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: In a writ petition filed against the validity of the order which rejected petitioner's representation and claim seeking grant of minimum of pay scale, Alok Mathur, J held that the petitioners are also entitled for minimum of pay scale as is being granted to regular\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":196885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":213909,"position":1},"title":"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A review petition filed by the Union of India and the Chief Postmaster General was allowed by a Division Bench comprising of R.M. Borde and A.M. Dhavale, J. The review was sought of the judgment passed earlier by the same Court, wherein the candidates whose selection to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/amit-shah-fake-video-case-tel-hc-directs-sate-and-delhi-police-not-to-take-coercive-action-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":213909,"position":2},"title":"Telangana High Court directs Delhi Police not to take any coercive action in alleged doctored video of Union Minister Amit Shah\u2019s case","author":"Editor","date":"May 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court found the cause of action to be untenable as the petitioners were already accused in a similar case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299500,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/delhi-hc-air-india-limited-is-no-longer-amenable-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":213909,"position":3},"title":"Air India Limited being a private entity is no longer amenable to writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe writ petition, while initially deemed maintainable, has since become non-maintainable due to the privatization of Air India Limited. This development has rendered it beyond this Court's jurisdiction to issue any writ, order, or direction against the respondents.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":184624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/30\/period-service-completed-prior-regularisation-counted-towards-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":213909,"position":4},"title":"Period of service completed prior to regularisation, would be counted towards pensionary benefits","author":"Saba","date":"January 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A petition filed by the aggrieved under Articles 14, 16 and 226 of the Constitution, for denial of pensionary benefits was heard by the Bench of Mohinder Pal, J. The petitioners were unskilled labourers on daily wage contract under Deesa Irrigation Division in the year 1972. According\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/court-cannot-pass-a-general-direction-without-determining-main-issues-in-question\/","url_meta":{"origin":213909,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Court cannot pass a general direction without determining main issues in question","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Division Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sindhu Sharma, JJ. dismissed an order passed by the Single Judge in respect of determination of seniority. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants claimed that they were appointed as Junior Engineers vide an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}