{"id":213885,"date":"2019-04-23T16:00:07","date_gmt":"2019-04-23T10:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213885"},"modified":"2019-05-07T13:07:19","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T07:37:19","slug":"cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/","title":{"rendered":"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum"},"content":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai: <\/strong>Assessee preferred this appeal before P. Dinesha, J., where assessee was only aggrieved by the dismissal of the appeal by the First Appellate Authority, without condoning the delay in filing the first appeal.<\/p>\n

Assesse for explaining delay mentioned that one of the partners of the appellant firm had personal problems. Per contra, it was submitted by the respondent that the delay in filing the first appeal was nine months and the power to condone the delay after the end of 90 days lies only with the Court thus, impugned order should sustain. It was contended by the assessee that sufficient cause was shown and that the Courts had held that a liberal approach should be in condoning of delay. Lest a deliberation is shown for delay the explanation for delay needs to be accepted.<\/p>\n

Tribunal was of the view that appeal was filed under Section 129-A of the Customs Act and Section 129-A (5) empowered this forum to condone the delay of any number of days. Section 129 does not authorize this forum to enter the domain of the first appellate authority since the scope of appellate jurisdiction was limited and to assume the jurisdiction of the first appellate authority by this forum was not authorized. It was observed that the first appellate authority had exercised its discretion in accordance with limitation law and thus, this forum could not have judged the correctness of the same. Therefore, this appeal was dismissed. [Vikgnesh Enterprises v. Commissioner (GST), 2019 SCC OnLine CESTAT 55<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 16-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai: Assessee preferred this appeal before P. Dinesha, J., where assessee was only aggrieved by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":201689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31242,35031,20091,35030,35032],"class_list":["post-213885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-assessee","tag-condoning-delay","tag-first-appeal","tag-first-appellate-authority","tag-limitation-law"],"yoast_head":"\nCESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai: Assessee preferred this appeal before P. Dinesha, J., where assessee was only aggrieved by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-23T10:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-07T07:37:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/\",\"name\":\"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-23T10:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-07T07:37:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum","og_description":"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai: Assessee preferred this appeal before P. Dinesha, J., where assessee was only aggrieved by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-23T10:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-07T07:37:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/","name":"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","datePublished":"2019-04-23T10:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-07T07:37:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":53501,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/28\/appellate-authorities-cannot-condone-delay-beyond-the-limits-specified-in-the-statute\/","url_meta":{"origin":213885,"position":0},"title":"Appellate Authorities cannot condone delay beyond the limits specified in the statute","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: This division bench of S. Manikumar and D. Krishnakumar, JJ held that there can be no order for condonation of delay beyond the extended period of limitation, stating that when the legislative intent is indicated by the provisions of special laws that exclude the provisions of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/whether-expenditure-incurred-on-replacements-of-old-truck-bodies-will-be-treated-revenue-expenditure-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":213885,"position":1},"title":"Whether expenditure incurred on replacements of old truck bodies will be treated as revenue expenditure? ITAT answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata: The Bench of Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial member) and Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member) held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee as such on replacement of wooden body of trucks has to be allowed fully against the income of the assessee in the current year. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/09\/cant-treat-unequals-equally-no-automatic-vacation-of-stay-under-section-2542a-proviso-3-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-if-the-assessee-is-not-responsible-for-the-delay-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":213885,"position":2},"title":"Can’t treat unequals equally; No automatic vacation of stay under Section 254(2A) Proviso 3 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if the assessee is not responsible for the delay: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dealing with an important question as to the constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the 3-judge bench of RF Nariman*, BR Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ has held that any order of stay shall stand vacated after the expiry\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379468,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/26\/raj-hc-condoned-160-days-delay-in-filing-gst-appeal-and-remanded-back-to-appellate-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":213885,"position":3},"title":"Missed GST deadlines not fatal where intent to comply exists; Rajasthan HC condones 160-day delay","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"March 26, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCancellation of GST registration or missed appellate deadlines should not permanently debar a taxpayer from the GST framework, especially where the taxpayer intends to comply by filing returns, paying taxes, interest, and penalties, and rectifying defaults. In such cases, denial of opportunity to an assessee undermines the inclusive and facilitative\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"160-days delay in filing GST appeal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/160-days-delay-in-filing-GST-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/160-days-delay-in-filing-GST-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/160-days-delay-in-filing-GST-appeal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/160-days-delay-in-filing-GST-appeal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/28\/nclat-condonation-of-delay-filing-claim-wrong-catergory-no-ground-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":213885,"position":4},"title":"[Condonation of Delay] Filing of claim under wrong category is not substantial ground for condoning delay: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT rejected an application seeking Condonation of Delay of 49 days (about 1 and a half months) on the ground of want of sufficient cause.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/chh-hc-the-word-sufficient-cause-under-s-5-of-limitation-act-should-adopt-a-liberal-and-justice-oriented-construction-to-advance-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":213885,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | The word “sufficient cause” under S. 5 of Limitation Act should adopt a liberal and justice-oriented construction to advance justice","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J., allowed the appeal and condoned the delay while setting aside the impugned order. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction in respect of the land. The Trial Court dismissed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213885\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}