{"id":213867,"date":"2019-04-23T12:00:21","date_gmt":"2019-04-23T06:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213867"},"modified":"2019-04-25T12:20:57","modified_gmt":"2019-04-25T06:50:57","slug":"del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Vibhu Bhakru, J., set aside an order whereby the petitioner&#8217;s passport was impounded and gave him liberty to travel abroad subject to compliance with the conditions imposed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was facing criminal charges under Section 120-B read with Section 420 IPC along with Section 13(2) and 13(1)(<em>d)\u00a0<\/em>of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A charge-sheet was filed by the CBI and cognizance was taken by the Special Judge, after which the petitioner applied for regular bail. The bail was granted and the petitioner was called upon to surrender his passport to the Court concerned. Complying with the same, the petitioner deposited his passport with the Special Judge. Subsequently, he filed an application to travel abroad which was allowed subject to conditions imposed. Meanwhile, the Regional Passport Officer, vide the impugned order, impounded his passport under Section 10(3)(<em>e)\u00a0<\/em>of the Passports Act, 1967. The petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 11 against the said order, however, it was dismissed by Chief Passport Officer. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After discussing its earlier decision in\u00a0<em>Manish Kumar Mittal v. Chief Passport Officer,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6sY9DfaZ\">2013 SCC OnLine Del 3007<\/a>, the High Court was of the view that:\u00a0<strong>in the given facts of the present case, impounding the passport is not warranted considering that the petitioner had already been called upon to deposit the same with the concerned Court. Further, the permission has already been granted\u00a0 to the petitioner to travel overseas.&#8221;\u00a0<\/strong>In such a view, the Court set aside the order whereby the petitioner&#8217;s passport was impounded. He was given liberty to travel abroad, subject to compliance with the conditions imposed.[Vinod Kumar Asthana v. Chief Passport Officer, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y7897yRR\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Del 8138<\/b><\/a>, dated 16-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhakru, J., set aside an order whereby the petitioner&#8217;s passport was impounded and gave him liberty to travel abroad <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35022,10481,31867,35023,2724,35024,33118,35021],"class_list":["post-213867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abroad","tag-cbi","tag-criminal-charges","tag-impounding","tag-passport","tag-section-120-b-ipc","tag-section-420-ipc","tag-travel"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhakru, J., set aside an order whereby the petitioner&#8217;s passport was impounded and gave him liberty to travel abroad\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-23T06:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-25T06:50:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-23T06:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-25T06:50:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhakru, J., set aside an order whereby the petitioner&#8217;s passport was impounded and gave him liberty to travel abroad","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-23T06:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-25T06:50:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/","name":"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-23T06:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-25T06:50:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","url_meta":{"origin":213867,"position":0},"title":"Can someone&#8217;s passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Sujoy Paul, J., held that the pendency of matrimonial cases alone cannot be a ground to decline the renewal of the passport. In the present matter, the petitioner was a travel blogger and consultant who approached the Court a second time against the action of Regional\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297385,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/legal-implications-on-impounding-and-revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents\/","url_meta":{"origin":213867,"position":1},"title":"Legal Implications on Impounding and Revocation of Passport and Travel documents","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kapil Madan\u2020 and Sahil Madaan\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 62","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"revocation of passport and travel documents","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/kar-hc-elaborating-upon-s-6-of-passport-act-court-directs-for-renewal-of-passport-to-authorities-concerned-irrespective-of-a-pending-criminal-case-against-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":213867,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Elaborating upon S.6 of Passport Act, Court directs for renewal of passport to authorities concerned irrespective of a pending criminal case against petitioner","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Hemant Chandangoudar J., while allowing the Writ Petition against the Passport Authority, elaborated upon the relevant provisions of the Passport Act and the Right to unhindered movement as a facet to Article 21. Brief Facts This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the constitution praying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327668,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/31\/allahabad-high-court-sets-aside-passport-authority-order-impounding-man-passport-pending-criminal-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":213867,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad HC sets aside Passport Authority&#8217;s order impounding a man\u2019s passport due to pending criminal case","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: In a writ petition challenging the communication issued by the Regional Passport Officer, whereby he has been informed that decision has been taken to impound the passport issued in his favour under Section 10 (3) (e) of the Passports Act, 1967 on the ground of pending criminal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255165,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/05\/no-final-report-and-no-cognizance-signify-there-is-no-pending-criminal-proceeding\/","url_meta":{"origin":213867,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | No final report and no cognizance signify there is no pending criminal proceeding; HC lays down parameters governing issuance of passport in a criminal case","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Bechu Kurian Thomas, J., held that if the final report had not been filed and no cognizance had been taken it would mean that there is no criminal proceeding pending and the Passport Authority are free to decide the grant of passport. The petitioner had challenged communication\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":277085,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/09\/madras-high-court-accused-cannot-be-denied-bail-if-charges-under-uapa-dropped-against-him-after-the-investigation-on-the-reason-that-criminal-conspiracy-under-section-120-b\/","url_meta":{"origin":213867,"position":5},"title":"Madras High Court | Once UAPA charges quashed, accused cannot be denied bail on ground that criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC attracts the offence punishable under the provisions of UAPA","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In an appeal against the order passed by the Special Court rejecting the appellant's bail, the division bench of P.N. Prakash and RMT. Teekaa Raman did not support the reason provided by the Special Court for rejecting the bail application. The National Investigation Agency registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213867\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}