{"id":213864,"date":"2019-04-23T11:00:07","date_gmt":"2019-04-23T05:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213864"},"modified":"2019-05-03T14:32:26","modified_gmt":"2019-05-03T09:02:26","slug":"bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; ‘cryptic order’ with a single observation set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:<\/strong> S.C. Dharmadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., allowed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai.<\/p>\n

Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. (assessee) was registered with the Central Excise Department. In 2009, the assessee entered into an agreement with the Central Railway for leasing out 416 wagons for 20 years. The Commissioner of Central Excise raised a service tax demand on the said activity. This was appealed against by the assessee and the CESTAT set aside the demand raised by the CCE and disposed of the entire appeal by a ‘single sentence order’ stating that there was no foundation in the show cause notice issued to the assessee in bringing out whether any service element is involved while renting the wagons to the Railways.<\/p>\n

Not impressed by the manner in which the CESTAT dealt with the appeal, the High Court said:\u00a0“It is by now well settled that in Appeal field before the CESTAT, it is required to refer to all the materials before the Commissioner (Appeals). The order passed by CESTAT is devoid of any reasons. It has only recorded an abrupt finding without discussing the issue raised before it and without mentioning any reason for the conclusion.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

It was next observed:\u00a0“CESTAT while deciding the Appeal has to exercise its jurisdiction as a fact-finding authority. We find that the CESTAT has recorded only an abrupt finding without discussing the issue and without mentioning any reason for their conclusion.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Holding that the ‘cryptic order’ was not sustainable, the Court remitted the matter back to CESTAT for such fresh consideration in accordance with law. [Commissioner (GST) v. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 666<\/a>,<\/b> dated 18-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: S.C. Dharmadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., allowed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST against the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35018,6651,35019,35020],"class_list":["post-213864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appellate-jurisdiction","tag-cestat","tag-cryptic-order","tag-fact-finding-authority"],"yoast_head":"\nBom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; 'cryptic order' with a single observation set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; 'cryptic order' with a single observation set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: S.C. Dharmadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., allowed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST against the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-23T05:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-03T09:02:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/\",\"name\":\"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; 'cryptic order' with a single observation set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-23T05:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-03T09:02:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; ‘cryptic order’ with a single observation set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; 'cryptic order' with a single observation set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; 'cryptic order' with a single observation set aside","og_description":"Bombay High Court: S.C. Dharmadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., allowed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST against the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-23T05:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-03T09:02:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/","name":"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; 'cryptic order' with a single observation set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-04-23T05:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-03T09:02:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; ‘cryptic order’ with a single observation set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/25\/excise-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":213864,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Entitlement to compensation on general principles for inordinate delay in receiving monies due; Interest on refund of excise duty granted","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Ajay Tewari and Pankaj Jain, JJ., contemplated the appeal where the interest on refund of excise duty was rejected by the authorities. The main question before the Court was whether the assessee was entitled to interest. Factual Matrix of the case:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/06\/karnataka-high-court-no-suppression-of-material-facts-if-show-cause-notice-issued-is-based-on-balance-sheet-appeal-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":213864,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka High Court | No suppression of material facts if show cause notice issued is based on balance sheet; Appeal denied","author":"Editor","date":"July 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of PS Dinesh and Anant Pamana Hegde, JJ. rejected the appeal filed by Commissioner of Central Tax and considered that Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (\u2018CESTAT') was right in dropping the demand for extended period mainly on the ground that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/cestat-correctness-of-exercise-of-discretion-in-accordance-with-limitation-law-not-under-the-scrutiny-of-the-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":213864,"position":2},"title":"CESTAT | Correctness of exercise of discretion in accordance with limitation law not under the scrutiny of the forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai: Assessee preferred this appeal before P. Dinesha, J., where assessee was only aggrieved by the dismissal of the appeal by the First Appellate Authority, without condoning the delay in filing the first appeal. Assesse for explaining delay mentioned that one of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/cestat-demand-of-interest-to-be-calculated-from-the-date-of-determination-of-due-amount-till-actual-date-of-payment-of-duty-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":213864,"position":3},"title":"CESTAT | Demand of interest to be calculated from the date of determination of due amount till actual date of payment of duty; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member), allowed an appeal which was filed aggrieved by the judgment and order given by Commissioner (Appeals). The issue before the Tribunal was whether the demand of interest was to be calculated from the date of clearance of goods\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226982,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/13\/cestat-benefit-of-s-80-finance-act-1994-allowed-to-assessee-who-paid-major-portion-of-tax-liability-before-issue-of-show-cause-notice\/","url_meta":{"origin":213864,"position":4},"title":"CESTAT | Benefit of S. 80, Finance Act, 1994 allowed to assessee who paid major portion of tax liability before issue of show cause notice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): A Division Bench of Sulekha Beevi (Judicial Member) and Anil G. Shakkarwar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal filed aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner. The appellants, who were engaged in execution of construction services, were issued Show Cause Notice dated 07-10-2010\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214317,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/cestat-clandestine-removal-sustainable-in-respect-of-duplicate-invoices-maintained-by-the-assessee\/","url_meta":{"origin":213864,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | Clandestine removal sustainable in respect of duplicate invoices maintained by the assessee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): This appeal was filed by Revenue before a Coram of Madhu Mohan Damodhar (Technical Member) and P. Dinesha (Judicial Member) being aggrieved by the impugned order where appeal of assessee was allowed on the ground that unwarranted removal were based on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213864\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}