{"id":213746,"date":"2019-04-19T17:00:34","date_gmt":"2019-04-19T11:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213746"},"modified":"2019-04-19T14:43:59","modified_gmt":"2019-04-19T09:13:59","slug":"mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | To waive off “mandatory 6 months period” for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground — denied"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>The Bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a revision filed in respect of waiving off of the mandatory 6 months period under Section 151 CPC.<\/p>\n

The present application was filed following the stated facts, in which it has been stated that applicant and respondent filed an application under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act for grant of divorce by mutual consent. The case was adjourned for a period of 6 months with the advise to parties to reconsider their decision for obtaining a divorce.<\/p>\n

An application under Section 151 CPC was filed after the above order of adjournment was passed for seeking a waiver of a mandatory period of 6 months. The stated application was rejected on the ground that it is not in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the applicant, Awadhesh Pratap Singh Sisodiya submitted that, \u201cProvision of 6 months under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act is merely directory in nature and not mandatory.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cFor waiving the period of 6 months as provided under Section 13-B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act, parties should point out that there is no possibility of cohabitation or there is no possibility of alternative rehabilitation, but the personal inconvenience of parties cannot be a ground.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

The High Court stated that, an application under Section 151 CPC was filed on the singular ground that the respondent is a teacher and applicant a private doctor, therefore, they cannot come to the Court frequently. Further, the Court went on to state that, application for waiver of mandatory 6 months period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is not tenable.\u201d <\/strong>Once parties have approached the Court seeking relief, they have to abide by the procedure provided under the statute.<\/p>\n

Therefore, Trial Court did not commit any mistake by rejection the application under Section 151 CPC. [Mayank Shrivastava v. Ritu Shrivastava, CR-256 of 2019, Order dated 09-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a revision filed in respect of waiving off of the mandatory <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2846,34966,34965,34967,34968],"class_list":["post-213746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-divorce","tag-mandatory-6-months-period","tag-murual-consent","tag-section-13-b-2-hindu-marriage-act","tag-waive-off"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | To waive off "mandatory 6 months period" for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground -- denied | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | To waive off "mandatory 6 months period" for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground -- denied\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a revision filed in respect of waiving off of the mandatory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-19T11:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | To waive off \\\"mandatory 6 months period\\\" for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground -- denied | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-19T11:30:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | To waive off “mandatory 6 months period” for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground — denied\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | To waive off \"mandatory 6 months period\" for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground -- denied | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | To waive off \"mandatory 6 months period\" for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground -- denied","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a revision filed in respect of waiving off of the mandatory","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-19T11:30:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/","name":"MP HC | To waive off \"mandatory 6 months period\" for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground -- denied | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-19T11:30:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | To waive off “mandatory 6 months period” for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground — denied"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":250755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/05\/cooling-period-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":213746,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Is the 6 months period stipulated under S. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act mandatory or relaxation in exceptional situations is permitted? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J., addressed a petition with regard to waiving the cooling period. Whether the minimum period of 6 months stipulated under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a motion of passing for a decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/waiting-period-will-only-prolong-their-agony\/","url_meta":{"origin":213746,"position":1},"title":"MP HC |\u00a0Waiting period will only prolong their agony; Court waives off cooling period in divorce proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.A. Dharmadhikari, J., decided in the matter of the petition which was filed challenging the order passed by Additional Principal Judge to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, whereby the application filed by the petitioner and respondent under section 13-B of HMA for waiving off\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/12\/hp-hc-whether-minimum-period-of-six-months-stipulated-under-s-13b2-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-for-a-motion-of-passing-decree-of-divorce-on-the-basis-of-mutual-consent-can-be-relaxed-court-expla\/","url_meta":{"origin":213746,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Whether minimum period of six months stipulated under S. 13(B)(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act for a motion of passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent can be relaxed? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"February 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., disposed of a petition while granting liberty to the parties to move an appropriate application seeking relaxation of the period prescribed under Section 28(2) of the Special Marriage Act 1954. The parties were husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/08\/decree-for-dissolution-of-marriage-by-mutual-consent-procedurally-unsound-if-not-based-on-satisfaction-of-grounds-stated-in-section-10a-of-the-divorce-act-1869\/","url_meta":{"origin":213746,"position":3},"title":"Decree for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent procedurally unsound if not based on satisfaction of grounds stated in Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. allowed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court for the said court\u2019s failure in conducting a proper enquiry and for failure in recording satisfaction based on such an enquiry conducted. The appellant and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":156074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/video-conferencing-can-be-used-for-conducting-proceedings-in-second-motion-of-mutual-consent-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":213746,"position":4},"title":"Video conferencing can be used for conducting proceedings in second motion of mutual consent divorce","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Holding that the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is not mandatory but directory, the bench of AK Goel and UU Lalit, JJ said that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/19\/whether-denial-of-sex-can-qualify-as-exceptional-depravity-hindu-marriage-act-divorce-mutual-consent-temperamental-issue-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":213746,"position":5},"title":"Whether denial of sex can qualify as \u201cexceptional depravity\u201d under S. 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act and allow waiver of one-year mandatory period? Del HC unfolds","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Noting that, Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act intends to discourage the couples from breaking the sacred bond of marriage in haste, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, ACJ and Jasmeet Singh, J., held that, a mandatory one year period granted under Section 14 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}