{"id":213728,"date":"2019-04-19T10:30:41","date_gmt":"2019-04-19T05:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213728"},"modified":"2019-04-19T10:18:14","modified_gmt":"2019-04-19T04:48:14","slug":"all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court<\/strong>: The Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. dismissed a petition filed against the order which rejected the candidature of the petitioner for the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Examination-2018 on the ground that he was in full-time employment and thus did not have the required experience for the candidature.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were that in the petitioner had enrolled himself as an advocate with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2010. Thereafter he got in full-time employment as Law Officer with the State Bank of India and the Punjab National Bank respectively in 2014. However, he never surrendered his license to practice and it was never suspended despite the information of employment to the Bar Council. During his employment with the SBI, he appeared in courts and provided legal assistance to the senior counsel of the Bank at Allahabad and Lucknow. The contention arose when he appeared for the preliminary examination for the U.P. HJS in 2018 and his name was rejected as indicated due to the fact that he was in ’employment’. He made a representation against this which was rejected as the Selection Committee opined that he was in permanent employment as Deputy Manager (Law) in SBI from 2014 onwards. Accordingly, he was not an advocate of the standing required in Rule 5(c) of the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The Counsel for the petitioner, Tarun Verma, submitted that despite his full-time employment he continued to practice law by appearing before the courts thus he was eligible for appointment in the U.P. HJS.<\/p>\n

The Court to adjudicate this looked into Article 233(2) of the Constitution which in unequivocal term provides that a person not already in service shall be eligible for appointment as District Judge if he has been in practice as an advocate or pleader for not less than 7 years thus making 7 years of practice a mandate. After the above constitutional provision came the Bar Council of India Rules framed under Section 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961 which completely prohibits an advocate from taking any full-time employment during his continuance of the practice. Further, Rule 5(c) of The U.P. HJS Rules, 1975 stated that the eligibility for direct recruitment to the U.P. HJS is from amongst the advocates of not less than 7 years standing meaning thereby that a minimum of 7 years standing as an Advocate is a sine-qua-non <\/em>for selection\/appointment in U.P. HJS through direct recruitment. The Court thus held that it was elementary for holding the post of DJ\/U.P. HJS to have atleast 7 years of actual standing as an advocate and not the theoretic knowledge of the law as in full-time employment. Further, it was stated that Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules created a legal fiction to the effect that a person duly enrolled as an advocate ceases to be one as soon as he takes full-time employment on salary even if continues to occasionally appear in law Court. This legal fiction has to be recognized as real. The petition was thus dismissed. [Shiv Kumar Pankha v. High Court of Allahabad, WRIT – A No. – 25580 of 2018, Order dated 05-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. dismissed a petition filed against the order which rejected <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34952,34956,34953,34955,34954,34957],"class_list":["post-213728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bar-council-of-delhi","tag-full-time-employment","tag-law-officer","tag-punjab-national-bank","tag-state-bank-of-india","tag-u-p-higher-judicial-service-examination"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. dismissed a petition filed against the order which rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-19T05:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-19T05:00:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. dismissed a petition filed against the order which rejected","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-19T05:00:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/","name":"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-19T05:00:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/21\/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-rejection-of-candidature-of-law-officer-of-sail-for-appointment-to-delhi-higher-judicial-services-for-the-duties-being-analogous-to-advocate-meeting-eligibility-requirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":213728,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court set aside rejection of candidature for appointment to Delhi Higher Judicial Services, 2022","author":"Arunima","date":"March 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that the petitioner was enrolled as an advocate in 2010 and he fulfils the requirement of \"continuously practicing as an advocate for not less than 7 years on the last date of receipt of applications\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/18\/candidate-with-bipolar-disorder-denied-equal-opportunity-of-employment-in-delhi-judicial-service-on-account-of-his-disability-not-being-found-permanent\/","url_meta":{"origin":213728,"position":1},"title":"4 Reasons why HC found person with \u2018bipolar disorder\u2019 to be fit to discharge responsibilities as \u2018Judicial Officer\u2019: Read how last year Del HC outrightly denied \u2018discrimination\u2019 in employment against person with disability","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Sanjeev Narula, JJ., decided a matter while reasoning out on why a person with Bipolar Disability should be granted reservation under the mental illness category for the appointment as Judicial Officer. Background The present petition was preferred to assail the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":293089,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/25\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-by-judicial-officer-challenging-appointment-of-charman-of-competition-commission-of-india-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":213728,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a retired judicial officer challenging selection of Chairman at Competition Commission of India","author":"Arunima","date":"May 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Additional Solicitor General submitted that Ms. Ravneet Kaur, an IAS officer was appointed as Chairman, Competition Commission of India by the Selection Panel.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/31\/delhi-high-court-foreign-nationals-cannot-be-restricted-from-enrollment-under-state-bar-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":213728,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court permits a South Korean national, a NALSAR graduate to be enrolled as an Advocate in view of Section 24 Advocates Act","author":"Arunima","date":"May 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court held that foreign nationals are not per se barred from being considered for enrolment under Section 24 of Advocates Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/15\/delhi-hc-selection-committee-need-not-record-reasons-for-its-decision-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":213728,"position":4},"title":"Selection Committee need not record reasons for its decision as long as due consideration was given to candidate’s merit: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe role of the Selection Committee is neither judicial nor adjudicatory. In the absence of any rule or regulation, there was no obligation on the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (\u2018ACC') for providing reasons while passing the order regarding approval or non-approval of a candidate.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/employer-to-exercise-discretion-in-matters-of-canceling-candidature-in-accordance-with-law-laid-down-by-the-apex-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":213728,"position":5},"title":"Employer to exercise discretion in matters of cancelling candidature in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. disposed of a petition where petitioner was selected for appointment to the post of Constable in U.P. Police in the recruitment exercise initiated in the year 2015. He had to be trained but his candidature was not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213728"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213728\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}