{"id":213664,"date":"2019-04-18T14:00:42","date_gmt":"2019-04-18T08:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213664"},"modified":"2019-04-19T17:26:53","modified_gmt":"2019-04-19T11:56:53","slug":"ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the suit for realization of the insurance money on the ground that no communication of renewal of the policy was made at the time of the alleged occurrence and no risk could be assumed in the absence of any valid policy.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were that the plaintiff was the owner of a shop, he availed a cash credit loan of Rs 20,000 from the State Bank of India. He had stock of Rs 30,000 in the shop. The Bank insured the shop with the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. After the expiration of the policy, he sent a letter along with a cheque of Rs 300 to defendant 1 for renewal of policy for another year. In the meanwhile, a theft was committed in the shop in which goods worth Rs 45,383 was stolen. The plaintiff claimed insurance money. The defendant, denying the liability pleaded that the plaintiff had not sent a letter along with a cheque of Rs 300 to defendant 1 for renewal of policy on time and it was received after the expiration of the policy, thus there was no risk covered on the day the theft happened as there was no policy on the date of the occurrence. Thus there was no liability to pay compensation.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the cheque was sent after the expiry of the policy. No communication was made by the defendant to the plaintiff about the acceptance of the proposal. No policy was issued by the defendant. There was no concluded contract. Thus the defendant was not held to be liable to pay any amount towards the alleged loss sustained by the plaintiff. The appeal was thus dismissed. [Prasanna Kumar Acharya v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Ori 157<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the suit for realization of the insurance money on the ground <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34920,34922,2728,3301,34923,34921],"class_list":["post-213664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acceptance-of-contract","tag-cash-credit-loan","tag-compensation","tag-liability","tag-proposal","tag-renewal-of-policy"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the suit for realization of the insurance money on the ground\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-18T08:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-19T11:56:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-18T08:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-19T11:56:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance","og_description":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the suit for realization of the insurance money on the ground","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-18T08:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-19T11:56:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/","name":"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-18T08:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-19T11:56:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/ori-hc-acceptance-of-contract-must-be-signified-by-some-act-agreed-on-by-the-parties-or-from-which-the-law-raises-a-presumption-of-acceptance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Acceptance of contract must be signified by some act agreed on by the parties or from which the law raises a presumption of acceptance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266648,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":213664,"position":0},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Read four articles and nine significant decisions of Supreme Court in Part 5 of 2022 SCC Volume 3. Appointment of Arbitrators: In this article, the author discusses the issue of validity of party appointed arbitrators in the case of multi-arbitrator tribunals, such as a three-member Arbitral Tribunal. Unilateral Appointment of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260669,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/27\/insurer-refuses-to-issue-insurance-policy-as-risk-confirmation-letter-obtained-on-concealment-of-material-fact-by-insurance-broker-policy-will-be-vitiated\/","url_meta":{"origin":213664,"position":1},"title":"Insurer refuses to issue insurance policy as Risk Confirmation letter obtained on concealment of material fact by Insurance Broker: Policy will be vitiated? NCDRC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Ram Surat Maurya (Presiding Member) addressed a matter wherein the date of issue of the Risk Confirmation Letter was in a serious dispute leading to Insurance Broker\u2019s fraudulent act. The complainant had a factory, and the OP was engaged in the business of providing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Insurance.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Insurance.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Insurance.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Insurance.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Insurance.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6651,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/04\/repudiation-of-policy-claim-on-the-ground-of-non-disclosure-of-material-facts-declared-improper\/","url_meta":{"origin":213664,"position":2},"title":"Repudiation of policy claim on the ground of non-disclosure of material facts, declared improper","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 4, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): While declaring the repudiation of claim of a policyholder by the insurance company on the ground of non-disclosure of material facts as improper, NCDRC directed the insurance company to pay the insurance cover amount to the policyholder. A pilot of a private airline had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/24\/no-fresh-permissions-renewal-of-permission-shall-be-granted-by-reserve-bank-ad-category-i-banks-to-any-foreign-law-firm-for-opening-of-liaison-office-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":213664,"position":3},"title":"No fresh permissions\/ renewal of permission shall be granted by Reserve Bank\/AD Category-I banks to any foreign law firm for opening of Liaison Office in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"No fresh permissions\/ renewal of permission shall be granted by the Reserve Bank\/AD Category-I banks to any foreign law firm for the opening of Liaison Office in India, till the policy is reviewed based on, among others, final disposal of the matter by the Supreme Court in Bar Council of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":199516,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/","url_meta":{"origin":213664,"position":4},"title":"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench comprising of R.K. Agarwal, J., M. Shreesha, Member, dismissed the revision petition filed against the order of Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The respondent had purchased an insurance policy from Oriental Insurance Company which was valid till 28-12-2015, however, the respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/double-insurance-overlapping-policies-right-insurance-forfeit-levis-supreme-court-judgments-india-law-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":213664,"position":5},"title":"Double Insurance\u2013Overlapping policies: Grant of actual loss from one insurer will forfeit right to claim from other insurer; SC rejects Levi\u2019s\u2019 insurance claim","author":"Editor","date":"May 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case relating to double insurance, the 3-Judge Bench comprising of Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat* and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ., reversed the impugned order of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which allowed the insurance claim of Levi Strauss (India) Pvt. Ltd. which was repudiated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213664\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}