{"id":213466,"date":"2019-04-09T18:00:15","date_gmt":"2019-04-09T12:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213466"},"modified":"2019-04-12T13:49:46","modified_gmt":"2019-04-12T08:19:46","slug":"mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case were such that petitioners are daughters of respondent who had sold his property to other respondents. After the sale was concluded one of the respondent to whom the property was sold filed an application under Sections 109 and 110 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 before the Tehsildar seeking mutation of his name which was allowed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner being aggrieved by the same filed an appeal before the Sub-Divisional Officer Revenue, Garoth. SDO allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by Tehsildar on the ground that the Tehsildar did not inquire about the status of the property if it was a self-earned property or ancestral property before passing the order of mutation. Being aggrieved by the order of SDO an appeal was preferred before the Additional Commissioner who set aside the order passed by SDO and therefore confirming the order of Tehsildar, hence, this petition was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was brought before Court that petitioners had already filed a Civil Suit challenging the sale deed which was executed by respondent in favour of one of the other respondent claiming their right and title over the property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court observed the settled law that the orders passed by the Revenue Authority were not binding on the Civil Court and Revenue Court could not have decided the title of the property. Court viewed that lest a Civil Suit is pending the issues raised in this petition could be decided before Civil Court. With the aforementioned observation, this petition was dismissed. [Bharat Kunwar v. Mangilal, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7O2oHfr1\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine MP 609<\/b><\/a>, dated 05-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J. Facts of the case were such that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34779,10551,32017,34856,30459,34857],"class_list":["post-213466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ancestral-property","tag-civil-court","tag-mutation","tag-revenue-authority","tag-sale-deed","tag-self-earned-property"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J. Facts of the case were such that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-09T12:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-12T08:19:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-09T12:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-12T08:19:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":288,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Ancestral Property\",\"civil court\",\"Mutation\",\"Revenue Authority\",\"sale deed\",\"self-earned property\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-09T12:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-12T08:19:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/04\\\/09\\\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J. Facts of the case were such that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-09T12:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-12T08:19:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court","datePublished":"2019-04-09T12:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-12T08:19:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/"},"wordCount":288,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Ancestral Property","civil court","Mutation","Revenue Authority","sale deed","self-earned property"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","name":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-09T12:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-12T08:19:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":206368,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":213466,"position":0},"title":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of G. Narendar, J. hearing a civil writ petition set aside the order of revenue authority passed after 30 years, ruling that the said power was exercised after a lapse of a long time and hence was unreasonable. The present matter pertained\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":213466,"position":1},"title":"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The petition had been filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J., from the proceeding going on under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act, for mutation. This order of mutation was filed by Tehsildar in favour of respondent. Petitioner contended that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":341840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/19\/tehsildar-cant-decide-mutation-applications-based-on-disputed-testamentary-documents-particularly-a-will-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":213466,"position":2},"title":"Tehsildar can\u2019t decide mutation applications based on disputed testamentary documents, particularly a Will: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRevenue Officers, including the Tehsildar, do not have judicial authority to resolve disputes related to wills or non-testamentary documents. These matters must be decided by the Civil Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244051,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/will\/","url_meta":{"origin":213466,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Do the revenue authorities have jurisdiction to decide the correctness and genuineness of a \u201cWill\u201d? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., disposed of a writ petition setting aside the orders passed by the Board of Revenue and Additional Commissioner in relation to a matter of Will. The petition contained that the husband of the petitioner had one-half share in the agricultural land bearing survey\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":328949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/18\/sikmi-rights-supreme-court-directs-tehsildar-carry-out-measurement-of-disputed-property-maintains-status-quo\/","url_meta":{"origin":213466,"position":4},"title":"[Sikmi Rights] Supreme Court directs Tehsildar to carry out measurement of disputed property; Maintains status quo","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court clarified that if there is any attempt by the parties to obstruct the revenue authorities or the local police from complying with our directions, suitable action will be taken against them.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363797,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":213466,"position":5},"title":"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property&#8217;s mutation","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA share was earmarked to the excluded sharer as well, even though the same might not preclude the rights of the excluded sharer to challenge the partnership deed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}