{"id":213436,"date":"2019-04-09T16:00:03","date_gmt":"2019-04-09T10:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213436"},"modified":"2019-04-12T14:48:16","modified_gmt":"2019-04-12T09:18:16","slug":"ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of the Trial Court which rejected an application of the petitioner filed under sub-section (2) of Section 80 CPC to waive notice on the ground of urgency.<\/p>\n

Plaintiffs-petitioners had instituted the suit for a perpetual injunction against the defendants and also filed an application under sub-section (2) of Section 80 CPC to waive notice on the ground of urgency. However, the Trial Court rejected the application. The petition was filed against the order of the Trial Court. The petitioners had filed an application for injuncting the defendants from demolishing a portion of the house standing over the suit land. The suit had been instituted to obtain an urgent relief against the Government. Mr Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners submitted that the Trial Court had without assigning any reason rejected the petition.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that Proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 80 CPC postulates that the Court shall, if it is satisfied, after hearing the parties, that no urgent or immediate relief need be granted in the suit, return the plaint for presentation to it after complying with the requirements of sub-section (1). The Trial Court had rejected the petition without giving reasons. This amounted to the denial of justice. The petition was thus allowed. [Basantilata Swain v. State of Orissa, 2019 SCC OnLine Ori 133<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of the Trial Court which <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34845,3659,34844,34843],"class_list":["post-213436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ground-of-urgency","tag-notice","tag-perpetual-injunction","tag-section-80-cpc"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of the Trial Court which\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-09T10:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-12T09:18:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-09T10:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-12T09:18:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at","og_description":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of the Trial Court which","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-09T10:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-12T09:18:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/","name":"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-09T10:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-12T09:18:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":306223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":213436,"position":0},"title":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cProceedings under Section 24 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006, are summary in nature while an injunction suit filed by the respondent is a regular suit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354093,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/kar-hc-factors-for-granting-police-protection-by-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":213436,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka High Court lays down factors to be considered by Trial Courts before granting police protection","author":"Editor","date":"July 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Trial Court cannot order police protection mechanically. Unless the trial Court satisfies itself that there is an imminent need for police aid\/police help, it cannot order for police protection on mere request.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"police protection by Trial Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/police-protection-by-Trial-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/police-protection-by-Trial-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/police-protection-by-Trial-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/police-protection-by-Trial-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/notice-under-s-326-of-u-p-municipalities-act-not-mandatory-if-defeats-the-purpose-of-injunction-suit-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":213436,"position":2},"title":"Suit not barred for want of Notice under S. 326 of U.P. Municipalities Act if it defeats the purpose of Injunction suit; Allahabad HC upholds Civil Judge order","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether the suit is barred by any law must be determined from the statements in the plaint and it is not open to decide the issue on the basis of any other material including the written statement in the case.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/mp-hc-plaint-filed-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-can-be-rejected-based-on-grounds-mentioned-in-rule-11-or-if-the-cause-of-action-has-not-been-disclosed\/","url_meta":{"origin":213436,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Plaint filed under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC can be rejected based on grounds mentioned in Rule 11 or if the cause of action has not been disclosed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Prakash Shrivastava, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 115 CPC where they challenged the order of the Trial Court, whereby their application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The respondents had filed the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":158504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/22\/power-to-recall-a-witness-cannot-be-invoked-to-fill-up-omission-in-the-evidence-already-led-by-witness\/","url_meta":{"origin":213436,"position":4},"title":"Power to recall a witness cannot be invoked to fill up omission in the evidence already led by witness","author":"Saba","date":"September 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order passed by the learned Civil Judge whereby application filed under Section 151 CPC on behalf of the petitioners-defendants for leading additional evidence was dismissed, a Single Judge Bench of Sandeep Sharma,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/hp-hc-exemption-for-not-giving-prior-notice-under-s-80-cpc-granted-to-petitioner-as-the-matter-was-of-urgent-importance-prohibitory-injunction-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":213436,"position":5},"title":"HP HC | Exemption for not giving prior notice under S. 80 CPC granted to petitioner as the matter was of urgent importance; prohibitory injunction granted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Sandeep Sharma, J. contemplated the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India where the order passed by the Civil Judge was challenged. The factual matrix of the case was that the application under Section 80(2) CPC was filed by the petitioner to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}