{"id":213362,"date":"2019-04-06T17:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-04-06T11:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213362"},"modified":"2019-04-08T17:53:07","modified_gmt":"2019-04-08T12:23:07","slug":"ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the writ petition which revolved around the issue of ascertaining as to whether the caste \u2018Raj Gond\u2019 is synonymous to \u2018Gond\u2019 as was mentioned in the Record of Rights (ROR).<\/p>\n

The facts were that opposite party 1 and 2 filed an application under Section 23 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 (\u201cOLR Act\u201d) before the Sub-Collector to declare a sale deed void and restore possession. The Contention was that they were scheduled tribe persons. They belonged to caste \u2018Gond\u2019. The father of opposite party 1 and 2 had transferred the land in favor of the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners without obtaining permission from the Revenue Officer under Section 22 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960.<\/p>\n

The petitioners (herein Opposite Party 1 and 2) contended that they were Raj Gond by caste. They did not belong to caste \u2018Gond\u2019 thus no permission was required for alienation of the land. Their vendor, the father was a literate person and in the sale deed, he described his caste as \u2018Raj Gond\u2019. In the course of hearing, opposite party 1 and 2 stated that they belonged to \u2018Gond\u2019 by caste but in the ROR, their caste was mentioned as \u2018Raj Gond\u2019. Their father was the zamindar of Loisingha. In 1936 settlement, he was bestowed with the title of \u201cRaja\u201d. After 1936 settlement; he used to write Raja before their caste, though he belonged to \u2018Gond\u2019 caste. The opposite party No. 3 came to hold that the caste of opposite party 1 and 2 was \u2018Gond\u2019, not \u2018Raj Gond\u2019. They were scheduled tribe persons and no permission was accorded by the authority thus the deed was a void one. Accordingly, the possession was restored to them and a writ of delivery of possession of the same was issued. The petitioners then filed an appeal before the Additional District Magistrate, Balangir. The appellate authority held that in the sale deed, caste was mentioned as \u2018Raj Gond\u2019. No authority could interpret \u2018Raj Gond\u2019 as \u2018Chief Gonds\u2019 or synonymous to \u2018Gond\u2019 thus no permission under Section 22 of the OLR Act was necessary for alienation of land. The appeal was thus allowed. Mrs Sahoo, the Advocate for the petitioners, submitted that the father was not a scheduled tribe person. Thus permission under Section 22 of the OLR Act was not a sine qua non for alienation of the land.<\/p>\n

High Court held that no roving inquiry is permissible to ascertain as to whether the caste \u2018Raj Gond\u2019 is synonymous to \u2018Gond\u2019. Section 22 and Section 23 of the OLR Act would not come into play. The impugned order was thus quashed and the writ application was allowed. [Belmati Pradhan v. Jaya Krushna Singh Rai, 2019 SCC OnLine Ori 144<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the writ petition which revolved around the issue of ascertaining as <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34794,34795,34797,29585,34796,34793,34798],"class_list":["post-213362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-gond","tag-raj-gond","tag-revenue-officer","tag-scheduled-tribe","tag-section-23-of-the-orissa-land-reforms-act","tag-st-order","tag-writ-of-delivery-of-possession"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the writ petition which revolved around the issue of ascertaining as\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-06T11:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-08T12:23:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-06T11:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-08T12:23:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0","og_description":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the writ petition which revolved around the issue of ascertaining as","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-06T11:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-08T12:23:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/","name":"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-06T11:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-08T12:23:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/06\/ori-hc-st-order-to-be-read-as-it-is-not-permissible-to-say-a-tribe-is-synonymous-to-the-one-mentioned-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | ST Order to be read as it is: Not permissible to say a tribe is \u2018synonymous\u2019 to the one mentioned in the Order\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/bombay-high-court-could-not-have-granted-scheduled-tribe-status-to-gowari-community-holds-sc-read-what-happens-to-admissions-employment-secured-so-far\/","url_meta":{"origin":213362,"position":0},"title":"Bombay High Court could not have granted Scheduled Tribe status to “Gowari” community, holds SC. Read what happens to admissions, employment secured so far","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Bombay High Court declared that tribe \u201cGowari\u201d is a part of Scheduled Tribe \u201cGond Gowari\u201d thereby leading to several people taking benefit of Scheduled Tribes for admissions and employment, the bench of Ashok Bhushan*, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah, JJ has held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/casteism-is-obstruction-abuse-by-upper-caste-person-due-to-property-dispute-an-offence-under-sc-st-act-not-in-all-cases-says-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":213362,"position":1},"title":"Is obstruction & abuse by upper caste person due to property dispute an offence under SC\/ST Act? Not in all cases, says SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where abuses were hurled by a person of upper caste at a person belonging to Scheduled Caste due to a property dispute between them, the 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that no offence under Section 3(1)(r)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/26\/bombay-hc-quashes-sc-st-act-fir-against-tv-channel-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":213362,"position":2},"title":"Mere Reference to Caste Name Not an Offence Unless Used to Intentionally Insult or Humiliate: Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Marathi TV Channel Executives","author":"Ritu","date":"December 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"No specific allegation was made that the petitioners, who were not members of a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe, had intentionally undertaken an act to insult, intimidate or humiliate the first informant, who is a member of the scheduled caste.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"FIR Against TV Channel Executives","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/25\/conversion-to-christianity-ends-scheduled-caste-status-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":213362,"position":3},"title":"Conversion to Christianity extinguishes SC\/ST status and protection under SC\/ST Act: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 25, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe SC\/ST Act serves as a crucial legal framework to protect the rights and dignity of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in India, ensuring stringent measures against offences of atrocities and promoting their welfare and security.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conversion to Christianity ends Scheduled Caste status","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Conversion-to-Christianity-ends-Scheduled-Caste-status.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Conversion-to-Christianity-ends-Scheduled-Caste-status.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Conversion-to-Christianity-ends-Scheduled-Caste-status.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Conversion-to-Christianity-ends-Scheduled-Caste-status.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297572,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":213362,"position":4},"title":"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is essentially meant for protecting the members of a SC and ST from atrocity or oppression, however, it cannot be allowed to be misused.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":88391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/28\/sarfeasi-act-being-the-parliamentary-legislation-prevails-over-the-tripura-land-revenue-and-land-reforms-act-1960\/","url_meta":{"origin":213362,"position":5},"title":"SARFEASI Act, being the Parliamentary legislation, prevails over the Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dealing with the matter where it was contended that a Sale Notification issued under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) was in infraction of Section 187 of the Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960, the Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}