{"id":213043,"date":"2019-04-01T14:00:14","date_gmt":"2019-04-01T08:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=213043"},"modified":"2019-04-02T14:51:38","modified_gmt":"2019-04-02T09:21:38","slug":"jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/","title":{"rendered":"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0A Bench of Ananda Sen, J. dismissed a petition seeking a declaration of result on having been qualified, finding no illegality in withholding the result by the Jharkhand Academic Council (JAC).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter the petitioner through the learned counsel Mr Surendra Pd. Sinha, had submitted that his name was reflected in the provisional merit list as a successful candidate but his result was not declared for unknown reasons. He further prayed for a direction upon respondents to issue mark sheet of JTET Examination-2016, in which he appeared and stood qualified. Subsequently, a counter affidavit was filed by the respondents through the learned counsel Mrs Sanchita where the name of the petitioner was indicated with a * (star mark) in the provisional merit list. The star mark meant that it was subject to verification, upon which it was found that the petitioner did not darken the OMR sheet against column no. 8, in respect of Language-I.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court found the statement so made by the learned counsel for the respondents to be correct and found no illegality in JAC declaring the OMR sheet to be defective and the withholding of the result as a subsequent consequence. The Court later returned the OMR sheet to the learned counsel for the respondents.[Narendra Kumar v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NhV1CmB5\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 276<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 14-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Ananda Sen, J. dismissed a petition seeking a declaration of result on having been qualified, finding no <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34666,34667,34668,34669],"class_list":["post-213043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-filing-of-omr-sheet","tag-jharkhand-academic-council","tag-result","tag-verification"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Ananda Sen, J. dismissed a petition seeking a declaration of result on having been qualified, finding no\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-01T08:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-02T09:21:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/\",\"name\":\"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-01T08:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-02T09:21:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Ananda Sen, J. dismissed a petition seeking a declaration of result on having been qualified, finding no","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-04-01T08:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-02T09:21:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/","name":"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-04-01T08:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-02T09:21:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/jha-hc-insouciance-in-filing-omr-sheet-justifies-withholding-of-result-even-if-appeared-and-stood-qualified\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jha HC | Insouciance in filing OMR sheet justifies withholding of result, even if appeared and stood qualified"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":242350,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/16\/pat-hc-usage-of-whitener-in-omr-sheet-led-to-annulment-of-result-by-controller-of-examination-hc-answers-in-affirmative\/","url_meta":{"origin":213043,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Usage of whitener in OMR sheet led to annulment of result by Controller of Examination: HC answer\u2019s in affirmative","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The question before Prabhat Kumar Singh J., for contemplation, was \u201cWhether the candidate has violated the instructions in the OMR sheet and whether his result was right annulled by the Controller of Examination ?\u201d Petitioner sought quashing of the decision delivered by Controller of Examination declaring the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/mistakenly-entered-wrong-digit-of-roll-no-in-omr-sheet\/","url_meta":{"origin":213043,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Mistakenly entered wrong digit of Roll No. in OMR sheet? Can one seek to add obtained scores when the sheet is rejected by Scanning Machine? HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: S.N. Pathak, J., rejected the petition filed by a civil services candidate, who was declared unsuccessful in prelims examination due to darkening wrong last digit of roll number in OMR sheet. The Bench stated, \u201cMay be the petitioner has not intentionally darkened digit 6 instead of 8,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271273,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/05\/jharkhand-high-court-judicial-review-seeks-to-ensure-fairness-in-treatment-and-not-the-fairness-of-conclusion-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":213043,"position":2},"title":"Jharkhand High Court | Judicial review seeks to ensure fairness in treatment and not the fairness of conclusion; petition dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J., while dismissing the writ petition dealing with a service matter preferred by the petitioner, for quashing the Notification issued under Memo dated 29-08-2013, held that there is no error, much less any manifest error of law and procedure leading to any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/14\/marks-disclosure-before-viva-voce-under-rti-held-not-permitted-punjab-haryana-superior-judicial-services-transparency-bias-recruitment-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":213043,"position":3},"title":"Punjab\/Haryana Superior Judicial Services| Can candidates seek disclosure of marks through RTI before viva-voce? SC decides","author":"Editor","date":"September 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The disclosure of the marks in the main examination before it is finalised and the viva-voce is conducted, would be against the principles of transparency, rather it will invite criticism of bias or favouritism.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/06\/legal-update-legal-news-complete-appointment-of-assistant-public-prosecutor\/","url_meta":{"origin":213043,"position":4},"title":"Jharkhand High Court directs Jharkhand Public Service Commission and State to complete the process of appointment of Assistant Public Prosecutor within a period of two months","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand Public Service Commission and State were directed to complete the process of appointment of Assistant Public Prosecutor pursuant to Advertisement No. 03\/18 within a period of two months.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":213812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/20\/pat-hc-no-arbitrariness-by-public-service-commission-where-marks-deducted-for-candidates-failure-to-abide-by-its-instructions\/","url_meta":{"origin":213043,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | No arbitrariness by Public Service Commission where marks deducted for candidate\u2019s failure to abide by its instructions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Anjana Mishra, J. rejected an appeal filed by a candidate who had appeared for the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) examination in 2015, but failed to qualify the same; holding that the decision of Commission could not be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}