{"id":212796,"date":"2019-03-30T18:30:40","date_gmt":"2019-03-30T13:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212796"},"modified":"2019-04-02T13:46:23","modified_gmt":"2019-04-02T08:16:23","slug":"hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0The Bench of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., dismissed a petition challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, being devoid of merit.<\/p>\n

In the pertinent case, the petitioner challenged the order of the Senior Civil Judge in Kalyan Chand v. Shiv Kumar<\/em>, CMA No. 598\/2018, Civil Suit No. 1975\/2013 which was under Order 7 Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The trial Court had allowed the application seeking permission to place another site plan on record, which contained the numbers of house and shop. It had allowed the application and even imposed costs upon the applicant for the permission so granted, by holding that it will clarify the suit property and would not cause any prejudice to the parties.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the contention of the learned counsel Mr T.S. Chauhan, that the impugned order causes prejudice to the petitioner is devoid of merit. And further held that, \u201csimply because the site plan has been permitted to be placed on record, does not ipso facto mean that site plan as it is stands proved. Petitioner shall have the opportunity not only to cross-examine the witnesses who may be produced by the plaintiff to prove the same, but also the opportunity to lead rebuttal evidence in this regard.\u201d<\/em>[Shiv Kumar v. Kalyan Chand, 2019 SCC OnLine HP 314<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., dismissed a petition challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, being <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34651,34653,34652],"class_list":["post-212796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-order-7-rule-14-of-code-of-civil-procedur","tag-rebuttal-evidence","tag-suit-property"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., dismissed a petition challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, being\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-30T13:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-02T08:16:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-30T13:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-02T08:16:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":239,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Order 7 Rule 14 of Code of Civil Procedur\",\"rebuttal evidence\",\"suit property\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-30T13:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-02T08:16:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/30\\\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., dismissed a petition challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, being","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-30T13:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-02T08:16:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates","datePublished":"2019-03-30T13:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-02T08:16:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/"},"wordCount":239,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","keywords":["Order 7 Rule 14 of Code of Civil Procedur","rebuttal evidence","suit property"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/","name":"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-30T13:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-02T08:16:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/hp-hc-a-permitted-site-plan-on-record-does-not-ipso-facto-stand-proved-court-reinstates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | A permitted site plan on record does not ipso facto stand proved, Court reinstates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/19\/ori-hc-admission-of-only-some-facts-would-not-qualify-defendants-the-right-to-begin-first-under-or-18-r-1-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":212796,"position":0},"title":"Ori HC | Admission of only some facts would not qualify defendants the right to begin first under Or. 18 R. 1 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the present petition and quashed an order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) directing the plaintiffs to begin first due to the defendants only admitting some of the facts alleged. In the present case, the possession of the suit property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/","url_meta":{"origin":212796,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sandeep K. Shinde, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 115 CPC taking exception to the order of the Civil Judge whereby he rejected applicants application seeking rejection of plaint by the respondent-plaintiff. The applicant-defendant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) read with Order 23\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215213,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/hp-hc-courts-must-follow-a-humane-and-justice-oriented-approach-when-there-is-no-inordinate-delay-and-opposite-party-can-be-monetarily-compensated\/","url_meta":{"origin":212796,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Courts must follow a humane and justice oriented approach when there is no inordinate delay, and opposite party can be monetarily compensated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel, J. allowed a petition for setting aside the order of dismissal of a civil suit, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division). In the instant case, the petitioner herein had filed a civil suit for specific performance of a contract which,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/16\/manipur-hc-mere-dismissal-of-earlier-suit-which-was-not-decided-on-merits-would-not-attract-res-judicata\/","url_meta":{"origin":212796,"position":3},"title":"Manipur HC | Mere dismissal of earlier suit which\u00a0was not decided on merits would not attract ‘res judicata’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: Kh. Nobin Singh, J. allowed civil revision petition questioning the validity and correctness of the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Imphal East. In the present case, a suit was instituted by the petitioner in a land dispute, without the originals of the documents being\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271413,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":212796,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., dismissed the revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge vide which the application for appointment was dismissed on the ground that the order refusing appointment does not decide any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/right-to-begin-under-order-18-rule-1-cpc-can-be-given-to-defendant-under-certain-circumstances\/","url_meta":{"origin":212796,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Right to begin\u2019 under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC can be given to defendant under certain circumstances","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution which challenged the order by the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Puri whereby the trial court allowed the application of the plaintiff under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC and directed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212796"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212796\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}